What is the solution to this volume integral problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around evaluating a volume integral with specific bounds. The initial attempts yielded incorrect results of 3 and 5.75 due to misinterpretation of the limits. Correct limits are established as 0 ≤ y ≤ 3, 0 ≤ x ≤ 1, and 0 ≤ z ≤ 1 - x, based on the constraints of the tetrahedron formed by the plane 3x + y + 3z = 3. A graphical representation is suggested to clarify the integration process. Ultimately, the correct evaluation of the integral should yield a result of 1.
johnwalton84
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I'm have trouble trying to evaluate the volume integral (shown in question.gif).

I've attempted integrating it a few different ways, either achieveing an answer of 3 or 5.75, and I'm not sure where I'm going wrong. (Some of what I've done is in attempted_solution.gif)

Any comments gratefully received...
 

Attachments

  • question.gif
    question.gif
    939 bytes · Views: 487
  • attempted_solution.gif
    attempted_solution.gif
    3.8 KB · Views: 468
Physics news on Phys.org
Your upper limits are not meaningful!
Let's look at this closely:
a) 0<=y<=3
These bounds should be obvious.
b) 0<=x and 0<=z
Okay?
c) Now, to the last limit indicated by the plane x+z=1
Since, by b) neither x or z can be negative, we can choose the following limits:
0<=x<=1
0<=z<=1-x

Okay with this?
 
arildno said:
Your upper limits are not meaningful!
Let's look at this closely:
a) 0<=y<=3
These bounds should be obvious.
b) 0<=x and 0<=z
Okay?
c) Now, to the last limit indicated by the plane x+z=1
Since, by b) neither x or z can be negative, we can choose the following limits:
0<=x<=1
0<=z<=1-x

Okay with this?

Since we're speaking about the triorthogonal tetrahedron determined by the intersection of the plane 3x+y+3z=3 with the coordinate axes,maybe a graphical representation might help.
Chosing the integration limits correctly (the way Arildno showed you),u find after easy calculations that the integral should yield 1.
 
Yes, I've got it now. Thanks.

:smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top