Work Done in Circle - Why Not Zero? (Calc 3)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the work done by the force field F(x,y) = (x+2y^2)j as an object moves counterclockwise around a specified circular path. The context is within calculus, specifically focusing on line integrals and the application of Green's Theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of work done in relation to conservative and non-conservative force fields, questioning why the work done in this scenario is not zero despite the object moving in a closed path. There is exploration of the implications of the force field being non-conservative.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the characteristics of conservative force fields and the conditions under which work can be zero. Some participants express understanding while others continue to seek clarification on the relationship between work and the conservativeness of the field.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the assumptions taught in physics classes about work and displacement, particularly in relation to conservative forces. Participants are also considering the implications of work being zero over specific loops versus all loops.

Weather Freak
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the work done by the force field F(x,y) = (x+2y^2)j as an object moves once counterclockwise about the circle (x-2^2+y^2=1 by first evaluating the integral directly then use Green's Theorem and evaluate the double integral.

Homework Equations


W = F*D*cos(theta)

The Attempt at a Solution


My problem is not in getting the answer. I haven't gotten the final answer yet, but that's not the issue at hand.

My Calc teacher told me that it is NOT zero, and I am wondering why. If you move around in a circle, there is no displacement, so therefore, work should be equal to zero. So what is it that makes this case different from everything I did in Physics class?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you move around in a circle through a force field that is a gradient of a scalar function, the work done by the force field is zero. Gravity is a conservative force for this reason--gravity is the gradient of gravitational potential. But if the force field is not the gradient of a function, the work done can be nonzero.
 
The force fields in physics (gravitational & coulombian) are conservatives. This means that they have the special caracteristic that if the net displacement is 0, then so is the total work. But not all vector fields have this property.
 
Weather Freak said:

Homework Statement


Find the work done by the force field F(x,y) = (x+2y^2)j as an object moves once counterclockwise about the circle (x-2^2+y^2=1 by first evaluating the integral directly then use Green's Theorem and evaluate the double integral.

Homework Equations


W = F*D*cos(theta)

The Attempt at a Solution


My problem is not in getting the answer. I haven't gotten the final answer yet, but that's not the issue at hand.

My Calc teacher told me that it is NOT zero, and I am wondering why. If you move around in a circle, there is no displacement, so therefore, work should be equal to zero. So what is it that makes this case different from everything I did in Physics class?
Surely you were not taught that the work done in moving away from and then back to an initial point is always 0? That is true only for a conservative force field. This field is not conservative.
 
Okay, I think I get it now, thanks! One more thing though... if the work ends up being zero, does that necessarily imply that the vector field is conservative, or is it only true the other way around?
 
If the work is 0 over ANY closed loop, then the field is conservative. But if it is 0 over one particular loop, it does not mean that it is conservative. It could be non-zero around some other loop.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K