Maxwell's equations differential forms

WannabeNewton
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,848
Reaction score
552

Homework Statement


I have to take the curved space - time homogenous and inhomogeneous maxwell equations, \triangledown ^{a}F_{ab} = -4\pi j_{b} and \triangledown _{[a}F_{bc]} = 0, and show they can be put in terms of differential forms as dF = 0 and d*F = 4\pi *j (here * is the hodge dual defined for any p - form \alpha as (*\alpha )_{b_1...b_{n-p}} = \frac{1}{p!}\alpha ^{a_1...a_p}\epsilon _{a_1...a_pb_1...b_{n-p}} where n is the dimension of the manifold and \epsilon is the natural volume element for the manifold i.e. a totally anti - symmetric nowhere vanishing continuous tensor field).

The Attempt at a Solution


Since the exterior derivative d is independent of the choice of derivative operator, I chose for convenience the unique metric compatible derivative operator \triangledown _{a} because \triangledown _{c}\epsilon _{a_1...a_p} = 0 identically and this simplifies the calculation. The homogenous ones are trivial since (dF)_{ba_1a_2} = 3\triangledown_{[b}F_{a_1a_2]} = 0. The inhomogeneous ones are really starting to annoy me :frown:. This is 4 dimensional space - time so we have that *F_{b_1b_2} = \frac{1}{2}F^{a_1a_2}\epsilon _{a_1a_2b_1b_2} hence (d*F)_{cb_1b_2} = 3\triangledown _{[c}*F_{b_1b_2]} = \triangledown _{c}*F_{b_1b_2} - \triangledown _{b_1}*F_{cb_2} + \triangledown _{b_2}*F_{cb_1} (where I have assumed the anti - symmetry of the hodge dual of the EM field strength tensor to combine terms). Plugging in the equation for the hodge dual gives us (d*F)_{cb_1b_2} = \frac{1}{2}(\epsilon _{a_1a_2b_1b_2}\triangledown _{c}F^{a_1a_2} - \epsilon _{a_1a_2cb_2}\triangledown _{b_1}F^{a_1a_2} + \epsilon _{a_1a_2cb_1}\triangledown _{b_2}F^{a_1a_2}). On the other hand, 4\pi (*j)_{b_1b_2b_3} = 4\pi j^{a_1}\epsilon _{a_1b_1b_2b_3} = \triangledown _{r}F^{a_1r}\epsilon _{a_1b_1b_2b_3}. Has my work been correct so far? This is where I'm stuck because the two different equations (the one for the hodge dual of the 4 - current density and the one for the exterior derivative of the hodge dual of the EM tensor) are being summed over totally different indices, as you can see, so I cannot begin to even see how to resolve the two so they can be equal.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah ok I got it. It was the form of the final pair of equations written above that threw me off with their unsettling nature and the stagnation stemmed from the equation we started with. In fact, if we had instead started with *(d*F) = -4\pi j, instead of what the book asked to start with, then the solution would have been much more obvious and saved me some tine :). Anyways, we take (d*F)_{cb_1b_2} = (\epsilon _{a_1a_2b_1b_2}\triangledown _{c}F^{a_1a_2} - \epsilon _{a_1a_2cb_2}\triangledown _{b_1}F^{a_1a_2} + \epsilon _{a_1a_2cb_1}\triangledown _{b_2}F^{a_1a_2}) and multiply both sides by \epsilon ^{b_1b_2b_3c} to get \epsilon ^{b_1b_2b_3c}(d*F)_{b_1b_2b_3} = (\delta ^{[b_3 c]}_{a_1a_2}\triangledown _{b_3}F^{a_1a_2} - \delta ^{[b_2 c]}_{a_1a_2}\triangledown _{b_2}F^{a_1a_2} + \delta ^{[b_1 c]}_{a_1a_2}\triangledown _{b_1}F^{a_1a_2}) = \triangledown _{b_3}F^{b_3c} - \triangledown _{b_2}F^{b_2c} + \triangledown _{b_1}F^{b_1c} = \triangledown _{b_1}F^{b_1c} = -4\pi j^{c} therefore \epsilon _{b_1b_2b_3c}(d*F)^{b_1b_2b_3} = *(d*F)_c = -4\pi j_{c} so **(d*F)_{a_1a_2a_3} = (-1)^{1 + 2(4 - 2)}(d*F)_{a_1a_2a_3} = -(d*F)_{a_1a_2a_3} = -4\pi *j_{a_1a_2a_3} thus (d*F)= 4\pi *j
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top