Electric Field Due to a Point Charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the coordinate on the x-axis where the net electric field from two fixed charges is zero. The charges are q1 = 2.1 * 10^-8 C and q2 = -4.00q1, positioned at x = 70 cm. The user attempts to set up equations based on the electric field equations but struggles to isolate the variables. A suggestion is made to relate the distances r1 and r2 using the total distance of 70 cm, which helps clarify the problem. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the equations and checking for errors in calculations.
Wables
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two particles are fixed to an x axis: particle 1 of charge q1= 2.1 * 10^-8 and particle 2 of charge q2= -4.00q1 at x=70 cm. At what coordinate on the axis is the net electric field produced by the particles equal to zero?

Homework Equations



Enet = E1 + E2
E=F/q
F=k q1q/r2
Let q = point charge in the above formulas

The Attempt at a Solution



Enet = E1 + E2 = 0
E1 = -E2

k q1/r12 = -k q2/r22
q1/r12 = q2/r22

At this point I thought I should try to isolate for one of the r values and plug it into a second equation to solve for one of the r values. But there is no other equation I can use to set up a system of equations... or is there? I am stuck here.

All help appreciated,
Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Wables! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 and X2 icons just above the Reply box :wink:)
Wables said:
At this point I thought I should try to isolate for one of the r values and plug it into a second equation to solve for one of the r values. But there is no other equation I can use to set up a system of equations... or is there?

you need an equation relating r1 and r2 :wink:
 
use r1 + r2 = x = 70 cm
 
Thanks for the welcome.

r1+x=20
r2+x=70

I can use these! Ooooh!

Okay, so:


q1/r12=q2/r22
=> (q1/q2)(1/2)r2=r1

Let (q1/q2)(1/2) = z

r2+x=70
=> r2=70-x

r1+x=20
=> zr2 + x = 20
=> z(70-x) + x = 20
=> x-zx = 20 - 70z

But z is a root of a negative number...?
 
Hi Wables! :smile:
Wables said:
q1/r12=q2/r22

No.

Did you draw a diagram?

You need a minus in there, don't you? :wink:
 
OH! Haha thanks for catching that. Okay. Thanks for your help, this question was really bugging me! :)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top