Electric field strength of wire problem

AI Thread Summary
The electric field strength 10 cm from a long charged wire can be calculated using the formula for an infinite line charge. Initially, the user incorrectly applied the point charge formula, leading to an incorrect answer. After clarifying the proper approach and correcting unit conversions, the correct electric field strength was determined to be approximately 1000 N/C, matching option B. The discussion emphasized the importance of using the appropriate formulas for different charge configurations. Understanding the distinction between point and line charges is crucial for solving such problems accurately.
jwoo
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The electric field strength 5 cm from a very long charged wire is 2000N/C . What is the field strength 10 cm from wire.
A)1x10^-4 N/C
B)1x10^3 N/C
C)9.9x10^7 N/C
D) None of these

I have
E=kq/r^2 and infinite line charge E=(2k\lambda)/R

2000 * .05 m^2 /K =q
q=5.56 E-8
k5.56E-8/.^21 m = 500 N/C so my answer would be D

But its wrong so where am I off? Thanks for the help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The field from a line charge and the field from a point charge have completely different forms. Don't mix them. Why don't you solve for lambda instead of q?
 
You have an infinite line of charge, so use that formula. The formula you are using is for point charges, not lines of charge.

(Edit: Dick beat me to it.:smile:)
 
okay so
E = k2lambda/r
(2000*.05)/2k =5.56x10^-9 = lambda
plug this in
5.56x10^-9 * k * 2 / .1 = E = 9.8x10^4 still not any of the answers
 
Put units on numbers, ok? I get 999.41 V/m. The difference between that and one of your numbers is pure round off. BTW, you didn't even have to solve for lambda. You are trying to compare 2*k*lambda/(0.05m)=2000 V/m with 2*k*lambda/(0.1m). Everything else is the same, but the denominator doubled. What's the exact answer?
 
Oh okay I see it. sorry I converted everything to meters. So then my answer would be the same as yours 999.99 which would be 1 x 10^3 . Thank you guys so much. I was having trouble with this because the logic just didnt make any sense. I gather I could've conceptually answered the problem but I wanted to know the math behind it. Thanks again.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top