Frequency of girl bobbing in swimming pool

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the frequency of a girl bobbing in a swimming pool while in an inflatable ring. The key points include the need to determine the extra force (F_e) after accounting for buoyant force (F_b) and the girl's weight (mg). The relationship between the forces and the use of Hooke's law to derive the frequency formula is emphasized, leading to the conclusion that frequency can be expressed as f = 1/(2π√(F_e/m)). After calculations using the given mass and cross-sectional area, the frequency is determined to be approximately 2.637 Hz. The conversation concludes with confirmation of the calculations and understanding of the physics involved.
kevlar94
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A girl with mass m kg steps into her inflatable ring with horizontal cross sectional area Am^2 and jumps into the pool. After the first splash, what is the frequency of the girl bobbing up and down?


Homework Equations


I assume that we need the extra force,F_e, after the buoyant force and the weight cancel. Archimedes F_b = mg

We can then use Newton 2, F=ma, where a=x".
x" = sqrt(F_e/m)

f=1/[2π√(F_e/m)]

The Attempt at a Solution


The above ω will be for the frequency.

I am not sure if the above is right and I do not know how to solve for the F_e

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello kevlar94,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

kevlar94 said:

Homework Statement


A girl with mass m kg steps into her inflatable ring with horizontal cross sectional area Am^2
Just so we are both on the same page, do you really mean that the cross sectional area is a function of the mass squared? Maybe the problem statement is written that way, but I just want to be sure.

In other words, do you really mean that

\mathrm{Area} = Am^2

where m is the mass and A is an some constant of proportionality?
and jumps into the pool. After the first splash, what is the frequency of the girl bobbing up and down?

Homework Equations


I assume that we need the extra force,F_e, after the buoyant force and the weight cancel. Archimedes F_b = mg
Well, you can say Fb = mg if nothing is accelerating, and is in static equilibrium. But that's not the case when the girl is bobbing up and down.

Perhaps you mean to say that Fe = Fb - mg?
We can then use Newton 2, F=ma, where a=x".
x" = sqrt(F_e/m)
Where did the square root come from? Newton's second law doesn't contain a square root.

\sum_i \vec F_i = m \ddot{z}

(since the motion in this problem is always in the up/down direction, I chose to use the variable z to represent the position. You could just as easily use the variable x to represent position if you want to though.)
f=1/[2π√(F_e/m)]
You'll have to show me where that came from.

The Attempt at a Solution


The above ω will be for the frequency.

I am not sure if the above is right and I do not know how to solve for the F_e
There are two forces involved. The weight of the girl and the buoyant force. You've already figured out the weight is mg.

The buoyant force is equal to the weight of the water that is displaced. The weight of the water is proportional to g and the density of water ρ. It's also proportional to the volume of the water that is displaced.

The cross sectional area is already given in the problem statement. You just need to throw in the vertical displacement to find the volume of displaced water.

Plug those back into Newton's second law and you'll get an equation containing both z and \ddot{z}: an ordinary, second order differential equation that you can solve.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the help.

collinsmark said:
Just so we are both on the same page, do you really mean that the cross sectional area is a function of the mass squared? Maybe the problem statement is written that way, but I just want to be sure.

In other words, do you really mean that

\mathrm{Area} = Am^2

where m is the mass and A is an some constant of proportionality?

Sorry, the prompt says the girl is 25kg and the inflatable ring has a horizontal cross-sectional area of 0.7m^2.

collinsmark said:
Well, you can say Fb = mg if nothing is accelerating, and is in static equilibrium. But that's not the case when the girl is bobbing up and down.

Perhaps you mean to say that Fe = Fb - mg?

Where did the square root come from? Newton's second law doesn't contain a square root.

Yes, that is what I meant. I skipped a step I should have mentioned.

The square root is from the formula for frequency using k(from hookes law) from my book.

So F_r = F_b - mg = ρ(displaced water)(V)g

I start with the assumption that the ring goes dx distance into the water. Which results in dV=Adx

dF_r=ρ*g*A*dx

Since I am using hookes law for a linear oscillator, F=kx or dF=kdx

so dF_r = kdx= ρ*g*A*dx which gives a k value of ρ*g*A -- when the dx cancels

Using k I can solve for ω using √(k/m) and then solve for frequency using ω=2π*f

Using the above values gives ω= √(9800*.7)/25 = 16.56

f=16.56/(2π) = 2.637Hz

Does that look correct?
 
kevlar94 said:
Sorry, the prompt says the girl is 25kg and the inflatable ring has a horizontal cross-sectional area of 0.7m^2.
Oh, 'm' is meters (not mass). Okay, I understand now.
Yes, that is what I meant. I skipped a step I should have mentioned.

The square root is from the formula for frequency using k(from hookes law) from my book.
Ah, Hooke's law. I never thought of that. The buoyant force is proportional to the displacement. So yes, Hooke's law and associated equations will work just fine. That should save you from having to solve the differential equation -- essentially from re-deriving the ω = √(k/m) formula.
So F_r = F_b - mg = ρ(displaced water)(V)g

I start with the assumption that the ring goes dx distance into the water. Which results in dV=Adx

dF_r=ρ*g*A*dx

Since I am using hookes law for a linear oscillator, F=kx or dF=kdx

so dF_r = kdx= ρ*g*A*dx which gives a k value of ρ*g*A -- when the dx cancels

Using k I can solve for ω using √(k/m) and then solve for frequency using ω=2π*f

Using the above values gives ω= √(9800*.7)/25 = 16.56

f=16.56/(2π) = 2.637Hz

Does that look correct?
That's what I got (out to the first three significant figures anyway). Good job. :approve:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top