I don't understand the derivation process here, help?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding the transition from Equation (15.7) to Equation (15.8) in a derivation related to oscillatory motion. The user questions whether "t" can be factored out and how sine and cosine terms seemingly vanish in the process. They note that Equation (15.7) represents instantaneous velocity as a function of time, while Equation (15.8) indicates the maximum speed of oscillation. The maximum value of sin(ωt) is also highlighted as a point of interest. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in understanding these mathematical transitions.
Felix Gonzales
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


  • I understand the derivation it showed that included the sin (15.7 in the image) I just don't understand the following (15.8 in the image). Does "t" get pulled out of the equation? If so what do we derive for then? Does it become 0? If so, it would remain 0 and sin(0) is just going to be 0, so that's not possible right? My issue is that I'm not sure how the sin and cos just disappear here.

Homework Equations


KlPeguK.png

xMNWQRs.png

30wyjWc.png


The Attempt at a Solution


  • The only conclusion I drew was that somewhere between 15.7 and 15.8 and not before (allowing for the first few steps in 15.7) so I figured someone just erased all that out so they could be left with ωA. Though I doubt that's true and which is why I'd rather get a second opinion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Equation (15.7) gives you the instantaneous velocity as a function of time, while Equation (15.8) gives you the expression for the maximum speed of the oscillation.

What is the maximum value of ##\sin \omega t##?
 
  • Like
Likes Felix Gonzales
Fightfish said:
Equation (15.7) gives you the instantaneous velocity as a function of time, while Equation (15.8) gives you the expression for the maximum speed of the oscillation.

What is the maximum value of ##\sin \omega t##?
*Edit* sorry I just saw the first half of your comment lol
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top