Potential difference due to a continuous charge distribution

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential at the center of curvature of a circular arc made from a uniformly charged plastic rod. The charge distribution is specified, and the problem involves understanding the integration of potential due to continuous charge distributions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the integration process for calculating electric potential, questioning why the integration is approached differently for a circular arc compared to a straight rod. There are discussions about the constants involved in the integration and the correct expression for linear charge density.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, clarifying the integration steps and discussing the values used for linear charge density. Some have expressed confusion about the integration limits and the application of the formula for point charges versus continuous distributions. Guidance has been provided regarding the evaluation of integrals and the constants involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the assumptions made regarding the charge distribution and the integration process. Participants are navigating through potential misunderstandings about the relationship between linear charge density and the geometry of the charge distribution.

Alec11
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
This is my first time using this site so please excuse me if I missed any guidelines.

1. Homework Statement

A plastic rod having a uniformly distributed charge Q=-25.6pC has been bent into a circular arc of radius R=3.71cm and central angle ∅=120°. With V=0 at infinity, what is the electric potential at P, the center of curvature of the rod?

Homework Equations


V=∫dV=∫kdq/r

The Attempt at a Solution


V=∫dV=∫kdq/r=(kλ)∫dΘ=(kλ)(2π/3), which is wrong.

The issue that I'm having with this problem is that I don't understand why the integration is done the way that it is. The equation I'm given to solve it is V=∫kdq/r, which equals out to V=kq/r after the integration. I'm confused because this is just the same exact equation used to find V for point charges. Why are you not required to put the integral in terms of theta and integrate over the length of the arc? If the charge distribution were kept as a straight rod, then I would have to integrate over the entire distribution, but since its a circular arc that just goes out the window.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WELCOME TO PF!

Alec11 said:
V=∫dV=∫kdq/r=(kλ)∫dΘ=(kλ)(2π/3), which is wrong.
Why do you say this is wrong?

The equation I'm given to solve it is V=∫kdq/r, which equals out to V=kq/r after the integration. I'm confused because this is just the same exact equation used to find V for point charges. Why are you not required to put the integral in terms of theta and integrate over the length of the arc?

Consider V=∫kdq/r.
k is a constant. Is r also a constant for this integration?
 
Because I tried doing that for this homework problem and it results in a wrong answer. I looked up how to do it and someone said that you just reduce the equation to V=kq/r, which gives the correct answer. This held true for every homework problem with circular arc shaped charge distributions. And yes, r is a constant for this integration.
 
Alec11 said:
Because I tried doing that for this homework problem and it results in a wrong answer.
What value did you use for λ?
And yes, r is a constant for this integration.
OK, so what does the integral ∫kdq/r reduce to if you "pull out" all the constants?
 
TSny said:
What value did you use for λ?

I calculated λ=Q/(rθ) = (-25.6x10^(-12))/((2π/3)*(0.0371)) = (-3.29x10^(-10)) C/m

TSny said:
OK, so what does the integral ∫kdq/r reduce to if you "pull out" all the constants?

It becomes (k/r)∫dq
 
Alec11 said:
I calculated λ=Q/(rθ) = (-25.6x10^(-12))/((2π/3)*(0.0371)) = (-3.29x10^(-10)) C/m
Looks good. What value did you get for V when you used this value of λ?
It becomes (k/r)∫dq
Good. What does ∫dq evaluate to?
 
TSny said:
Looks good. What value did you get for V when you used this value of λ?

I get V = -6.20V, which actually turns out to be right. Looking back at my previous attempts, it seems I accidentally went from dq => rθdθ, instead of dq => rdθ, which explains why I thought I was wrong originally. Thanks for helping me figure that out!
 
OK. Glad it got cleared up.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K