The speed at which a proton strikes the positive plate (uniform electric field).

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of a proton striking a positive plate in a uniform electric field. The original poster struggled with the problem, attempting various equations related to electric fields and forces but found no success. After receiving guidance, they recalled the equation F = qE and decided to apply it to determine the force acting on the proton. Ultimately, they reported success in solving the problem after further attempts. The conversation highlights the collaborative nature of problem-solving in physics.
_Chemicals_
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Here is the problem given. The answer is E.
ETqvD.png


Homework Equations



No equations are given. Assumed use of standard equations for electric field and force involving electric field.

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried using a few equations (E = F/q0), (F = mv^2), (E=(1/(4piEp0))(q/r^2)), and solving, but no luck. Could someone please give me guidance?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
_Chemicals_ said:

Homework Statement


Here is the problem given. The answer is E.
ETqvD.png


Homework Equations



No equations are given. Assumed use of standard equations for electric field and force involving electric field.

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried using a few equations (E = F/q0), (F = mv^2), (E=(1/(4piEp0))(q/r^2)), and solving, but no luck. Could someone please give me guidance?

If you can determine the force F acting on the charge, and this force acts on the proton over a distance of 7 cm, how much work is done?
 
Alright so I just remembered the simple equation F = qE so now I'm going to attempt what you said. Physics is not my strength however, so I will probably be back.
 
_Chemicals_ said:
Alright so I just remembered the simple equation F = qE so now I'm going to attempt what you said. Physics is not my strength however, so I will probably be back.

No worries, we'll be here!
 
Thank you for your tip. I was able to solve it!
 
Excellent.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top