Thermodynamics: Vertical pipe flow of geothermal water

mr.learnmore
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1. Water at T1=240 C and P1=16 MPa is at 2 km depth. A drilling hole with diameter 0.2 m has the water flowing up with mass flow rate at 2 kg/s. The hole is considered adiabatic(no heat transfer).
I need to find the following values at the top of the hole:
Enthalpy(h), temperature(T2), pressure(P2) and steam percentage(x) of the water.

There is no pipe friction. At the top of the hole there is a throttling valve which leads to further piping(so the pressure can not be considered to be 1 atm).



3. The Attempt at a Solution
The water is a compressed liquid in the beginning, so using saturated liquid values at T1 gives(from table):
v1=0.001229 m^3/kg
h1=1037.5 kJ/kg

The initial velocity is V =0.078241 m/s, using massflowrate = ρ*A*V.

The mass flow is steady, but as pressure drops with elevation the specific volume changes (I would think).
I'm not sure how to begin solving this, any ideas/hints are very welcome.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
The pressure gradient can be calculated with the density of your water and gravity. This should allow to calculate the system up to the point where water begins to boil, probably with approximations for the water density. Afterwards, I don't know how water and steam behave in the pipe.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top