Three light waves combine at a point find resultant amplitude and phase angle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the resultant amplitude and phase angle of three light waves combining at a point. The electric field components are given as E1, E2, and E3, with specific phase shifts. The participant initially questions whether to add the waves sequentially or all at once, ultimately finding that combining them directly yields the correct result. The resultant amplitude is calculated as ER = Eo sin(ωt) after simplifying the phase shifts, which effectively cancel each other out. The final conclusion confirms the correctness of the approach and the result obtained.
CianM
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three light waves combine at a point where their electric field components are

E1 = Eosin \omegat

E2 = Eosin (\omegat - 2\pi/3)

E3 = Eosin (\omegat + \pi/3)

Find the resultant amplitude of the electric field ER at that point and it's phase angle\beta
Write the resultant wav int the form E = ERsin(\omegat + \beta)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Am I right in assuming that first you add E1+E2 then add E12 + E3 using double angle formulas? Or am I going about this completely the wrong way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What about adding all three at once, using dbl angle formula to break out the phase shifts and collecting like terms. The results should be the same.
 
Well I already did the way I suggested and the answer I got was :
ER = 2Eo sin (\omegat)cos(\pi/3)
taking cos(\pi/3) = 1/2
then equals ER = Eosin( \omegat) .
Is this right?
 
yep, some careful examination of the problem shows that the -phase shift term is equal and opposite to the positive shift term, cancelling out, leaving your result. (in other words the two phase angles sum to pi)
 
Last edited:
Ok. Thanks for your help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top