Trying to get equivalent resistance of a circuit

AI Thread Summary
To find the equivalent resistance of a circuit, it's essential to clearly identify components in series and parallel. The user initially calculated 23.7 ohms, while the textbook states the correct answer is 100 ohms. By redrawing the circuit and properly analyzing the resistances, the user realized their mistake and recalculated the answer. Notably, the presence of 50 and 35-ohm resistors indicates a minimum resistance of 85 ohms. The discussion emphasizes the importance of visualizing circuit components for accurate calculations.
AmirWG
Messages
16
Reaction score
3
i had a problem in my textbook asking me to get equivalent resistance of a circuit , i ended up getting 23.7 ohm as my answer but my textbook says that the correct answer is 100 ohm
you can see my attempt here :
imgur link :


i really want to know what went wrong with my steps
thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • Noi6AHw.png
    Noi6AHw.png
    10.6 KB · Views: 223
Physics news on Phys.org
When you are analyzing a circuit, it helps to redraw it so that it is really clear what components are in parallel, and what are in series. In this case, you could redraw it to look like this:
Circuit.png

I suggest that you fill in the dashed portions of this diagram with the appropriate resistances and then do your series/parallel calculations.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, AmirWG and DaveE
tnich said:
When you are analyzing a circuit, it helps to redraw it so that it is really clear what components are in parallel, and what are in series. In this case, you could redraw it to look like this:
View attachment 248018
I suggest that you fill in the dashed portions of this diagram with the appropriate resistances and then do your series/parallel calculations.
i can now see why my steps went wrong and i am even able to get the correct answer now , thanks a lot for helping (:
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and tnich
One way to see immediately that the answer must be at least 85 is to notice that there is no way around the 50 and 35-ohm resisters. So there is a resistance of 85 to start with.
 
  • Like
Likes AmirWG
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top