Calculating Water Volume in a Tank Using Pressure Measurements

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the volume of water in a partially filled cubic aquarium, given that the pressure at the bottom is three times greater than the pressure on one side. Participants clarify that pressure varies with depth, and they discuss how to derive the average pressure and force on the sides and bottom of the tank. The integration of pressure forces is emphasized, with guidance on how to set up the integral to find the total force on the tank's side. The conversation highlights the need to express the results in symbolic form, focusing on the relationship between water depth and pressure. Ultimately, the goal is to determine the actual volume of water in the tank based on the given pressure conditions.
Regla

Homework Statement



on a flat desk is an aquarium with a volume of 640 cm3 ,t's not full of water. The pressure to the bottom of the aquarium is 3 times bigger than to one side of it, how much water is in the tank?

Homework Equations


46bcb6e308d86c8df7f4bbe05df5a44f6c2c2f0d

81eac1e205430d1f40810df36a0edffdc367af36
is the pressure,
545fd099af8541605f7ee55f08225526be88ce57
is the normal force,
7daff47fa58cdfd29dc333def748ff5fa4c923e3
is the area of the surface on contact.

The Attempt at a Solution


I think this mainly requires crunching of crude formulas, I don't even know how to calculate the pressure to the side of a tank even if I have more variables. Thanks for even reading so far, any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Regla said:
The pressure to the bottom of the aquarium is 3 times bigger than to one side of it, how much water is in the tank?
I'm not sure what the question means. Have you stated it exactly as given to you?
The pressure at the side is not uniform on the sides. It could mean the average pressure there.
Or, if, you knew the shape of the aquarium, it could mean the force, not the pressure.

If the water has depth h, what is the average pressure on the side?
 
  • Like
Likes Regla
This question is bonkers - is that the actual wording of the problem as given to you ?
 
  • Like
Likes Regla
haruspex said:
I'm not sure what the question means. Have you stated it exactly as given to you?
The pressure at the side is not uniform on the sides. It could mean the average pressure there.
Or, if, you knew the shape of the aquarium, it could mean the force, not the pressure.

If the water has depth h, what is the average pressure on the side?
Sorry I missed to mention that the tank is an cube, I forgot to mention it since I had to translate the whole question.
 
Regla said:
Sorry I missed to mention that the tank is an cube, I forgot to mention it since I had to translate the whole question.
Then I would interpret it as saying the force is the same on the bottom as on each side... particularly if it is a translation.
If the depth is h, can you calculate the force on each side?

Edit: correction... Since we know the depth is less than the length and width, the total force on a side must be less than that on the base, so the right interpretation must be that the average pressures are equal.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Nidum
haruspex said:
Then I would interpret it as saying the force is the same on the bottom as on each side... particularly if it is a translation.
If the depth is h, can you calculate the force on each side?
does that mean you would use the same formula as for the bottom? (ro)mg?
 
Regla said:
does that mean you would use the same formula as for the bottom? (ro)mg?
No. The pressure varies according to depth.
Consider a horizontal strip of width dx at depth x. What is the pressure there? What is the total force on that strip?
 
haruspex said:
No. The pressure varies according to depth.
Consider a horizontal strip of width dx at depth x. What is the pressure there? What is the total force on that strip?
so any idea how to find out the h? I'm trying to understand other branches of physics, not just the ones I'm fairly good at.
 
Regla said:
so any idea how to find out the h? I'm trying to understand other branches of physics, not just the ones I'm fairly good at.
We'll get to that. Please try to answer my question.
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
We'll get to that. Please try to answer my question.
ok so using a formula to find the F on a strip I used F=(ro)gLh*1/2 . I can put in all the numbers but what about depth?
 
  • #11
Regla said:
ok so using a formula to find the F on a strip I used F=(ro)gLh*1/2 . I can put in all the numbers but what about depth?
You need to solve for h using the information you have been given. Do you have another relationship involving h?
 
  • #12
Chestermiller said:
You need to solve for h using the information you have been given. Do you have another relationship involving h?
This is the part that I get stuck at, if I knew the exerted force on the side or bottom I could just rearrange the variables and be done with it, but all I know is that the force to the bottom is 3 times stronger than to one side.
 
  • #13
Regla said:
This is the part that I get stuck at, if I knew the exerted force on the side or bottom I could just rearrange the variables and be done with it, but all I know is that the force to the bottom is 3 times stronger than to one side.
What is the force to one side as a function of h (algebraically)?
 
  • #14
Regla said:
using a formula to find the F on a strip I used F=(ro)gLh*1/2
I specified a strip width dx at depth x, i.e. from depth x to depth x+dx. Where are those in your formula for the force?
 
  • #15
haruspex said:
I specified a strip width dx at depth x, i.e. from depth x to depth x+dx. Where are those in your formula for the force?
let's say the pressure on that strip is dF which is equal to the pressure at that depth P which we multiply by the area of the strip dA
dF=PdA dA=Ldx
dF=PLdx P=(ro)gx
dF=(ro)gxLdx
something like this?
 
  • #16
Yes. The force on an incremental strip at depth x is ##\rho g x L\ dx##

Now if you integrate that incremental force from top strip (x=0) to bottom strip (x=h), what do you get?
 
  • #17
jbriggs444 said:
Yes. The force on an incremental strip at depth x is ##\rho g x L\ dx##

Now if you integrate that incremental force from top strip (x=0) to bottom strip (x=h), what do you get?
I get the force applied to the whole wall of the aquarium, but we don't know the x or h
 
  • #18
Regla said:
I get the force applied to the whole wall of the aquarium, but we don't know the x or h
x is the variable of integration. After doing the integration and applying the bounds you will have a function of h.
The force on the base of the tank is also a function of h.
Find both functions.
 
  • #19
haruspex said:
x is the variable of integration. After doing the integration and applying the bounds you will have a function of h.
The force on the base of the tank is also a function of h.
Find both functions.
that makes some sense, I'll try that tomorrow. Thanks.
 
  • #20
haruspex said:
x is the variable of integration. After doing the integration and applying the bounds you will have a function of h.
The force on the base of the tank is also a function of h.
Find both functions.
I've got the formula for the base of the tank bF=(ro)gxL2
but I'm quite lost on how to find a function, we worked a bit with them last year, but we didn't find new functions we just solved given ones.(which is stupid to be honest)
 
  • #21
Regla said:
bF=(ro)gxL2
No, x is the depth of an arbitrary strip. You mean h, not x.
Regla said:
lost on how to find a function
For the force on the side, yes?
In post #15 you wrote that on the side ##dF=\rho gxL.dx##. Can you write that as an integral and integrate it?
 
  • #22
haruspex said:
No, x is the depth of an arbitrary strip. You mean h, not x.

For the force on the side, yes?
In post #15 you wrote that on the side ##dF=\rho gxL.dx##. Can you write that as an integral and integrate it?
∫f(x)dx=dF/(ro)gL I feel like I'm doing a lot of mistakes.
 
  • #23
*Length of any edge of cubic tank = h
*Depth of water = k.h

Pressure at top surface of water = ?
Pressure at bottom surface of water = ?

*Pressure varies linearly with depth .
Average pressure = ?

Area of side of tank = ?
Pressure force acting on side of tank = ?

Area of bottom of tank = ?
Pressure force acting on bottom of tank = ?

*Pressure force acting on tank side = 1/3 of pressure force acting on bottom of tank .
*Use to find value of k .
k = ?

*Volume of water in full tank = h3 = a given value .
*Use to find value of h .
h = ?

*Actual volume of water in tank = k.h3
What is final answer for volume of water in tank ?

*Note that final answer is really just k times the amount of water in full tank .
 
  • #24
Nidum said:
*Length of any edge of cubic tank = h
*Depth of water = k.h

Pressure at top surface of water = ?
Pressure at bottom surface of water = ?

*Pressure varies linearly with depth .
Average pressure = ?

Area of side of tank = ?
Pressure force acting on side of tank = ?

Area of bottom of tank = ?
Pressure force acting on bottom of tank = ?

*Pressure force acting on tank side = 1/3 of pressure force acting on bottom of tank .
*Use to find value of k .
k = ?

*Volume of water in full tank = h3 = a given value .
*Use to find value of h .
h = ?

*Actual volume of water in tank = k.h3
What is final answer for volume of water in tank ?

*Note that final answer is really just k times the amount of water in full tank .
k is the coefficient? right? I'' try that in a few hours.
 
  • #25
Regla said:
∫f(x)dx=dF/(ro)gL I feel like I'm doing a lot of mistakes.
@Nidum is trying to lead you past the integration step so that you do not have to evaluate that integral.

The key is that you are being asked to evaluate ##\int_0^h \rho g L \ x \ dx##

The ##\rho g L## factors out and all that's left is evaluating ##\rho g L\ \int_0^h x \ dx##

That integral should be easy to evaluate. It should give the same result that @Nidum is jumping to: The force on a side is the average pressure on a side multiplied by the [wetted] area of that side.
 
  • #26
jbriggs444 said:
@Nidum is trying to lead you past the integration step so that you do not have to evaluate that integral.

The key is that you are being asked to evaluate ##\int_0^h \rho g L \ x \ dx##

The ##\rho g L## factors out and all that's left is evaluating ##\rho g L\ \int_0^h x \ dx##

That integral should be easy to evaluate. It should give the same result that @Nidum is jumping to: The force on a side is the average pressure on a side multiplied by the [wetted] area of that side.
thanks for showing me how I was supposed to form the integral, my only question is what do you mean that ρgL factors out?
 
  • #27
Regla said:
thanks for showing me how I was supposed to form the integral, my only question is what do you mean that ρgL factors out?
The ##\rho##, the ##g## and the ##L## are all constant terms for our purposes. They do not depend on x. They are simply a constant multiplier on the value. As long as you have a constant multiplier on the function you are integrating, for example the k in:
$$\int_0^h k\ f(x)\ dx$$
then you are allowed to move that constant outside of the integral and instead write
$$k\ \int_0^h f(x)\ dx$$
Moving the constant out of the integral is what I call "factoring it out". It seems that Wiki even has a page on this principle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constant_factor_rule_in_integration
 
  • #28
jbriggs444 said:
The ##\rho##, the ##g## and the ##L## are all constant terms for our purposes. They do not depend on x. They are simply a constant multiplier on the value. As long as you have a constant multiplier on the function you are integrating, for example the k in:
$$\int_0^h k\ f(x)\ dx$$
then you are allowed to move that constant outside of the integral and instead write
$$k\ \int_0^h f(x)\ dx$$
Moving the constant out of the integral is what I call "factoring it out". It seems that Wiki even has a page on this principle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constant_factor_rule_in_integration
oh that makes sense.
 
  • #29
jbriggs444 said:
The ##\rho##, the ##g## and the ##L## are all constant terms for our purposes. They do not depend on x. They are simply a constant multiplier on the value. As long as you have a constant multiplier on the function you are integrating, for example the k in:
$$\int_0^h k\ f(x)\ dx$$
then you are allowed to move that constant outside of the integral and instead write
$$k\ \int_0^h f(x)\ dx$$
Moving the constant out of the integral is what I call "factoring it out". It seems that Wiki even has a page on this principle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constant_factor_rule_in_integration
did I enter everything correct?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (114).png
    Screenshot (114).png
    20.8 KB · Views: 370
  • #30
Regla said:
did I enter everything correct?
You are supposed to be integrating from 0 to h, not from 0 to 4. You are supposed to be integrating x, not 4. And what @haruspex is trying to get you do to is to express the result in symbolic form. You should wind up with an expression involving ##\rho##, ##g##, ##h## and ##L##.
 
  • #31
jbriggs444 said:
You are supposed to be integrating from 0 to h, not from 0 to 4. You are supposed to be integrating x, not 4.
the whole problem was stated as a volume of 64 dm3... so I thought that since 43=64 doesn't that mean h=4?
 
  • #32
Regla said:
the whole problem was stated as a volume of 64 dm3... so I thought that since 43=64 doesn't that mean h=4?
You are trying to find h. It will not be equal to 4.

h in this context refers to the height (or depth) of the water in the tank. The tank is not full.
 
  • #33
jbriggs444 said:
You are trying to find h. It will not be equal to 4.
like this?
Screenshot (116).png
 
  • #34
Regla said:
like this?
That appears to be a correct result. However, as has been suggested previously, it would be better to leave it in symbolic form and to avoid replacing ##\rho##, ##g## and ##L## with numeric values:

$$F_{side} = \rho g L \frac{h^2}{2}$$

Now can you write down a formula for the total force on the bottom of the tank in terms of ##\rho##, ##g##, ##L## and ##h##?
 
  • #35
jbriggs444 said:
That appears to be a correct result. However, as has been suggested previously, it would be better to leave it in symbolic form and to avoid replacing ##\rho##, ##g## and ##L## with numeric values:

$$F_{side} = \rho g L \frac{h^2}{2}$$

Now can you write down a formula for the total force on the bottom of the tank in terms of ##\rho##, ##g##, ##L## and ##h##?
Like this? or does the 4 have to be an x?
Screenshot (118).png
 
  • #36
Regla said:
Like this? or does the 4 have to be an x?
You can include "L" or you can include "4". Using both is nonsense. As I had suggested in #34, the correct equation is:

$$F_{side} = \rho g L \frac{h^2}{2}$$

You had previously come up with a formula for the force on the base:

Regla said:
I've got the formula for the base of the tank bF=(ro)gxL2

When you wrote that you were apparently using the variable "x" to denote depth. Let us use "h" for depth and reformat that result:

$$F_{base} = \rho g L^2 h$$

Now then. We have formulas for the force on the side and for the force on the base. The problem statement tells us the ratio of those two forces. Can you write down an equation expressing that fact?
 
  • #37
jbriggs444 said:
Now then. We have formulas for the force on the side and for the force on the base. The problem statement tells us the ratio of those two forces. Can you write down an equation expressing that fact?

Fbase/Fside=3 you mean something like this? ρgL2h/ρgL(h2/2)=3
 
  • #38
Regla said:
Fbase/Fside=3 you mean something like this? ρgL2h/ρgL(h2/2)=3
Yes. You should be able to simplify that significantly.
 
  • #39
jbriggs444 said:
Yes. You should be able to simplify that significantly.
so how do we find the volume or height of the water level? since that only tells the ratio.
 
  • #40
More calculating. Fewer questions.
 
  • #41
jbriggs444 said:
More calculating. Fewer questions.
so what does the integral in post #34? h? the height of the water level? or the number that I have to put in the post #37 formula?
but we still get the h in the integral.
 
  • #42
In #37 you had an equation:

Regla said:
Fbase/Fside=3 you mean something like this? ρgL2h/ρgL(h2/2)=3

Solve that equation for h. Or at least simplify it as I had suggested in #38.
 
  • Like
Likes Regla
  • #43
jbriggs444 said:
More calculating. Fewer questions.
I get h=0.00991988 or 0.01
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #44
jbriggs444 said:
In #37 you had an equation:
Solve that equation for h. Or at least simplify it as I had suggested in #38.
if I try to find the pressure to the bottom and side by putting in h I get always the same thing as 2. (ρgL2h/ρgL(h2/2)) It's a bit counter intuitive since I was stated that that should be 3, is the formula for the side equation right?
 
  • #45
ρgL2h/ρgL(h2/2)=3

Let's do a tidy re-arrangement of that equation :

ρgL2h = (3/2)ρgLh2

the ρg's cancel so :

L2h = (3/2)Lh2

Divide both sides by hL :

L = (3/2)h

Can you go from there ?
 
  • #46
Nidum said:
ρgL2h/ρgL(h2/2)=3

Let's do a tidy re-arrangement of that equation :

ρgL2h = (3/2)ρgLh2

the ρg's cancel so :

L2h = (3/2)Lh2

Divide both sides by hL :

L = (3/2)h

Can you go from there ?
that simplifies a lot of things, thanks, but when I calculate h (if L=40) it I get h=26.6667 or 27. the problem is that if I try to calculate the pressures they don't equal to the statement give in the equation (Pbase/Pside=3)
Pbase=(1000*9.8*402*27)/40*40=264600
Pside=(1000*9.8*40*(272/2)/40*27=132300
264600/132300=2. It doesn't match with the statement given. I feel like there is something wrong with the side force equation.
 
  • #47
L is not 40 . Simple numerical mistake I think ?
 
  • #48
Nidum said:
L is not 40 . Simple numerical mistake I think ?
If I know that the volume of the tank is 64 dm3 43=64 since that 4 is dm I change it into cm which is 40cm, isn't that right?
 
  • #49
Cube root of 640 is roughly 8.62

8.62cm x 8.62 cm x 8.62 cm = 640 cm3 .

.
 
  • #50
Nidum said:
Cube root of 640 is roughly 8.62

8.62cm x 8.62 cm x 8.62 cm = 640 cm3 .

.
even if I change L with 8.62 and h changes to roughly 5.75 I still get 2 when I calculate the Pressures in the way stated in post #46
 
Back
Top