Collection of Lame Jokes

  • Thread starter Thread starter quddusaliquddus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jokes
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around sharing and enjoying "lame" jokes, with participants contributing various puns and one-liners. Jokes include classic setups like "A duck walks into a pharmacy..." and "Why did the chicken cross the road?" along with playful wordplay, such as "What do you call a boomerang that doesn't work? A stick." The humor is characterized by its groan-inducing quality, with many jokes eliciting laughter despite their simplicity. Participants also engage in light banter about the nature of humor, with some jokes being deemed too funny to qualify as "lame." The thread highlights a shared enjoyment of corny humor and the camaraderie that comes from exchanging jokes, creating a lighthearted atmosphere.
  • #23,101
20230120_150716.webp
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes dwarde, davenn, DennisN and 6 others
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #23,102
  • #23,103
Which state has the best paint, chalk and crayons?

Color-ado!
 
  • Like
Likes dwarde, davenn and BillTre
  • #23,104
Here's where you go when you get a traffic ticket in this town:

IMG_1494.webp
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Wow
Likes dwarde, davenn, gmax137 and 4 others
  • #23,106
Screenshot_20250925_130141_YouTube.webp
 
  • #23,107
20230304_124533.webp
 
  • #23,108
20230305_162206.webp
 
  • #23,109
cemetery.webp
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes davenn, collinsmark, Ibix and 2 others
  • #23,110
20230126_100349.webp
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes dwarde, davenn, jtbell and 2 others
  • #23,111
Screenshot_20250925_130141_YouTube.webp
 
  • #23,112
20221014_051107.webp
 
  • Haha
Likes dwarde and BillTre
  • #23,113
What's wrong.webp
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes dwarde, davenn, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #23,114
IMG_1496.webp
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes WWGD and DennisN
  • #23,115
1758992804789.webp
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Haha
Likes dwarde, fresh_42, symbolipoint and 6 others
  • #23,116
20220910_200824.webp
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Likes DennisN and phinds
  • #23,117
20230106_114504.webp
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes davenn, DennisN, phinds and 1 other person
  • #23,118
20221101_125039.webp
 
  • Haha
Likes Ibix, BillTre and berkeman
  • #23,119
20221217_183934.webp
 
  • Like
Likes jtbell, Ibix, symbolipoint and 1 other person
  • #23,120
"Cowch Potatoes"

cowch.webp
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes davenn and BillTre
  • #23,121
9PKWPozaVrGurwPmd&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-fra3-2.webp
 
  • Love
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Ibix, dwarde, davenn and 2 others
  • #23,122
20221019_230420.webp
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Filip Larsen, dwarde, davenn and 3 others
  • #23,123
20230106_005024.webp
 
  • Haha
  • Agree
  • Like
Likes dwarde, BillTre, berkeman and 2 others
  • #23,124
1759131529826.webp
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes fresh_42, dwarde, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #23,125
Screenshot 2025-09-29 at 12.54.15 PM.webp
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes collinsmark, davenn, dwarde and 3 others
  • #23,126
1759187987677.webp
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Love
Likes jtbell, Borg, davenn and 6 others
  • #23,128
Ibix said:
No they won't.
I see what you've done there, Bertrand.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix and BillTre
  • #23,129
1759197733365.webp
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Likes jack action, berkeman, fresh_42 and 1 other person
  • #23,130
The United States drawn entirely from memory

1759221011687.webp
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Agree
Likes jtbell, BillTre, phinds and 4 others
  • #23,131
20220927_143424.webp
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes dwarde, Ibix, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #23,132
20220914_152408.webp
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes BillTre and davenn
  • #23,133
OCZQuLW_0mRQBgViN&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-fra3-1.webp
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes davenn, jtbell, WWGD and 1 other person
  • #23,134
20220916_012844.webp
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes sbrothy, DennisN, phinds and 1 other person
  • #23,135
20230114_221223.webp
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Love
Likes DennisN, davenn, Bystander and 1 other person
  • #23,136
WPC20OrhjMMWAMn6l&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-fra5-2.webp
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes davenn, BillTre and phinds
  • #23,137
Follow me for more parenting tips...

1759264982173.webp
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes DennisN, gmax137 and dwarde
  • #23,138
20220916_115647.webp
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes DennisN, Ibix and dwarde
  • #23,139
20220915_141412.webp
 
  • Like
Likes dwarde, jack action and jtbell
  • #23,140
fresh_42 said:
In Pittsburgh, it's "yinz" not "youse". And down South (US) it's "y'all". :wink:
 
  • #23,141
20220817_042857.webp
 
  • Haha
Likes DennisN and dwarde
  • #23,142
 
  • #23,143
1759347889161.webp
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes DennisN, BillTre, dwarde and 2 others
  • #23,144
20220718_233809.webp
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes davenn, DennisN, symbolipoint and 2 others
  • #23,145
20220718_233746.webp
 
  • #23,146
1000013708.webp
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes jtbell, davenn, Borg and 3 others
  • #23,147
WWGD said:
In the post-modernistic classic (and to be blatantly honest, quite puerile) book The Illuminatus! the authors claim the upper limit for the number of possible conspirators is 5, because the possible internal person-to-person combinations grow almost exponentially:

2 * 1 = 2
3 *2 * 1 = 6
4 * 3 *2 * 1 = 24
5 * 4 * 3 *2 * 1 = 120
6 * 5 * 4 * 3 *2 * 1 = 720
7 * 6 * 5 * 4 * 3 *2 * 1 = 5040
8 * 7 * 6 * 5 * 4 * 3 *2 * 1 = 40320

Personally I'd argue for a lower number but there you go.
 
  • #23,148
sbrothy said:
In the post-modernistic classic (and to be blatantly honest, quite puerile) book The Illuminatus! the authors claim the upper limit for the number of possible conspirators is 5, because the possible internal person-to-person combinations grow almost exponentially:

2 * 1 = 2
3 *2 * 1 = 6
4 * 3 *2 * 1 = 24
5 * 4 * 3 *2 * 1 = 120
6 * 5 * 4 * 3 *2 * 1 = 720
7 * 6 * 5 * 4 * 3 *2 * 1 = 5040
8 * 7 * 6 * 5 * 4 * 3 *2 * 1 = 40320

Personally I'd argue for a lower number but there you go.
I don't get your point. The number of internal person-to-person combinations is utterly irrelevant. What matters is the EXTERNAL communication of any of the members with people no in the group.

Two people can keep a secret but only if one of them is dead.
 
  • #23,149
phinds said:
I don't get your point. The number of internal person-to-person combinations is utterly irrelevant. What matters is the EXTERNAL communication of any of the members with people no in the group.

Two people can keep a secret but only if one of them is dead.
Yeah, I may not remember the book as well as I thought. It has been a while. It's not one you read when you've reached a certain age....
 
  • #23,150
sbrothy said:
In the post-modernistic classic (and to be blatantly honest, quite puerile) book The Illuminatus! the authors claim the upper limit for the number of possible conspirators is 5, because the possible internal person-to-person combinations grow almost exponentially:

2 * 1 = 2
3 *2 * 1 = 6
4 * 3 *2 * 1 = 24
5 * 4 * 3 *2 * 1 = 120
6 * 5 * 4 * 3 *2 * 1 = 720
7 * 6 * 5 * 4 * 3 *2 * 1 = 5040
8 * 7 * 6 * 5 * 4 * 3 *2 * 1 = 40320

Personally I'd argue for a lower number but there you go.
Those numbers are too high - in a full network each of the n people connects to n-1 people, so there are only n(n-1) connections, not n!.

Five is a mystic number in that series, which is very much into numerology. Although it also points out how silly this is and how it's used to manipulate the characters.

Fnord.
 

Similar threads

Replies
433
Views
31K
Replies
57
Views
8K
8
Replies
390
Views
38K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
185
Views
10K
Replies
4K
Views
430K
Back
Top