Find the Point Where Electric Field is Zero: A Charge Problem

AI Thread Summary
To find the point where the electric field is zero between two charges, Q1 (+9 nC) and Q2 (+4 nC), it's essential to analyze the regions along the x-axis. The electric fields from both charges must cancel each other out, which can occur either to the left of Q1, between the charges, or to the right of Q2. The discussion emphasizes the importance of drawing field vectors to visualize where cancellation might occur. Additionally, the potential at x = -5 and the work needed to move Q2 from x = 5 to x = 3 are related to understanding electric potential and work done against electric fields. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
Ruleski
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A pair of charges sits on the x-axis, a charge Q1 = +9 nC at the origin and Q2 = +4 nC at x = 5. Assume no other charges are present. All coordinates are in meters.

At which one of these points is the net electric field equal to zero?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Follow up questions:

What is the potential at x = -5 ?

How much work is required to move the +4 nC charge (Q2) from its original location at x = 5 to x = 3 ?

Any explanation would help?
Thank You
 
The field can be zero at a point only if the fields due to the two charges cancel out at that point.
In which region can this happen? Left of Q1 / between Q1 and Q2 / right of Q2 ?
In each region you could draw the field vectors due to each charge & see where they could possibly cancel out.

Moving on to the follow up questions, do you know the potential due to a charge? And, how work is related to potential ?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top