Tensor Manipulation: Is it Legal? | Homework Equations and Attempted Solution

redstone
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Wondering if one particular tensor manipulation is "legal"


Homework Equations


U^{ij}=\eta_{ab}F^{ia}F^{jb}
where F is the electromagnetic tensor, antisymmetric, with zeros on the diagonal

The Attempt at a Solution


So, starting there, is it legal for me to do this?
U^{ij}=F^{i}_{b}F^{jb}

U^{ij}=\eta^{b}_{i}\eta^{ai}F_{ab}F^{ji}

U^{ij}=\eta^{ab}F_{ab}F^{ji}

U^{ij}=0

since,

\eta^{ab}F_{ab}=0

that makes my answer seem to trivial to be the real answer, but I don't see the mistake
 
Physics news on Phys.org
redstone said:
... is it legal for me to do this?
...
U^{ij}=\eta^{b}_{i}\eta^{ai}F_{ab}F^{ji}
If you are using the standard notation, then no. You should never have more than two repeated indices (There are three "i"s).
 
ah, ok, thanks!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top