# Learn Reduced Phase Space in Mathematical Quantum Field Theory

**Estimated Read Time:**50 minute(s)

**Common Topics:**def, lie, algebra, example, algebroid

The following is one chapter in a series on Mathematical Quantum Field Theory.

The previous chapter is *10. Gauge symmetries*.

The next chapter is *12. Gauge fixing*.

## 11. Reduced phase space

In this chapter we discuss these topics:

- Global gauge reduction for strictly invariant functions (action functionals):
- Local gauge reduction for weakly invariant local functions (Lagrangian densities):

For a Lagrangian field theory with infinitesimal gauge symmetries, the *reduced phase space* is the quotient of the shell (the solution-locus of the equations of motion) by the action of the gauge symmetries; or rather it is the combined *homotopy quotient* by the gauge symmetries and its *homotopy intersection* with the shell. Passing to the reduced phase space may lift the obstruction for a gauge theory to have a covariant phase space and hence a quantization.

The higher differential geometry of homotopy quotients and homotopy intersections is usefully modeled by tools from homological algebra, here known as the *BV-BRST complex*.

In order to exhibit the key structure without getting distracted by the local jet bundle geometry, we first discuss the simple form in which the reduced phase space would appear after transgression (def. 7.32) if spacetime were compact, so that, by the principle of extremal action (prop. 7.37), it would be the derived critical locus (##d S \simeq 0##) of a globally defined action functional ##S##. This “global” version of the BV-BRST complex is example 11.7 below.

The genuine *local* construction of the derived shell is in the jet bundle of the field bundle, where the action functional appears “de-transgressed” in the form of the Lagrangian density, which however is invariant under gauge transformations generally only up to horizontally exact terms. This *local* incarnation of the reduced phase space is modeled by the genuine *local BV-BRST complex*, example 11.21 below.

Finally, under transgression of variational differential forms, this yields a differential on the graded local observables of the field theory. This is the *global BV-BRST complex* of the Lagrangian field theory (def. 11.28 below).

**derived critical loci inside Lie algebroids**

By analogy with the algebraic formulation of smooth functions between Cartesian spaces (the embedding of Cartesian spaces into formal duals of R-algebras, prop. 1.15) it is clear how to define a map (homomorphism) between Lie algebroids:

###### Definition 11.1. **(homomorphism between Lie algebroids)**

Given two derived Lie algebroids ##\mathfrak{a}##, ##\mathfrak{a}’## (def. 10.22), then a homomorphism between them

$$

f \;\colon\; \mathfrak{a} \longrightarrow \mathfrak{a}’

$$

is a dg-algebra-homomorphism between their Chevalley-Eilenberg algebras going the other way around

$$

CE(\mathfrak{a}) \longleftarrow CE(\mathfrak{a}’) \;\colon\; f^\ast

$$

such that this covers an algebra homomorphism on the function algebras:

$$

\array{

CE(\mathfrak{a}) &\overset{f^\ast}{\longleftarrow}& CE(\mathfrak{a}’)

\\

\downarrow && \downarrow

\\

C^\infty(X) &\underset{(f\vert_X)^\ast}{\longleftarrow}& C^\infty(Y)

}

\,.

$$

(This is also called a “non-curved sh-map”.)

###### Example 11.2. **(invariant functions in terms of Lie algebroids)**

Let ##\mathfrak{g}## be a super Lie algebra equipped with a Lie algebra action (def. 10.20)

$$

\array{

\mathfrak{g} \times X && \overset{R}{\longrightarrow} && T X

\\

& {}_{\llap{pr_2}}\searrow && \swarrow_{\rlap{rb}}

\\

&& X

}

$$

on a supermanifold ##X##. Then there is a canonical homomorphism of Lie algebroids (def. 11.1)

$$ \label{ProjectionMapForActionLieAlgebroid} \array{ X &&& CE(X) &=& C^\infty(X) &\oplus& 0 \\ \downarrow^{\rlap{p}} &\phantom{AAA}&& \uparrow^{\rlap{p^\ast}} && \uparrow^{\rlap{id}} && \uparrow^{\rlap{0}} \\ X/\mathfrak{g} &&& CE(X/\mathfrak{g}) &=& C^\infty(X) &\oplus& C^\infty(X) \otimes \wedge^\bullet \mathfrak{g}^\ast } $$ | (171) |

from the manifold ##X## regarded as a Lie algebroid by example 10.24 to the action Lie algebroid ##X/\mathfrak{g}## (example 10.21), which may be called the *homotopy quotient coprojection map*. The dual homomorphism of differential graded-commutative superalgebras is given simply by the identity on ##C^\infty(X)## and the zero map on ##\mathfrak{g}^\ast##.

Next regard the real line manifold ##\mathbb{R}^1## as a Lie algebroid by example 10.24. Then homomorphisms of Lie algebroids (def. 11.1) of the form

$$

S \;\colon\; X/\mathfrak{g} \longrightarrow \mathbb{R}^1

\,,

$$

hence *smooth functions on the Lie algebroid*, are equivalently

- ordinary smooth functions ##S \;\colon\; X \longrightarrow \mathbb{R}^1## on the underlying smooth manifold,
- which are invariant under the Lie algebra action in that ##R(-)(S) = 0##.

In terms of the canonical homotopy quotient coprojection map ##p## (171) this says that a smooth function on ##X## extension extends to the action Lie algebroid precisely if it is invariant:

$$

\array{

X &\overset{S}{\longrightarrow}& \mathbb{R}^1

\\

{}^{\llap{p}}\downarrow

&

\nearrow_{

\rlap{

\text{exists precisely if} \; S \; \text{is invariant}

}

}

\\

X/\mathfrak{g}

}

$$

**Proof.** An ##\mathbb{R}##-algebra homomorphism

$$

CE( X/\mathfrak{g} )

\overset{S^\ast}{\longleftarrow}

C^\infty(\mathbb{R}^1)

$$

is fixed by what it does to the canonical coordinate function ##x## on ##\mathbb{R}^1##, which is taken by ##S^\ast## to ##S \in C^\infty(X) \hookrightarrow CE(X/\mathfrak{g})##. For this to be a dg-algebra homomorphism it needs to respect the differentials on both sides. Since the differential on the right is trivial, the condition is that ##0 = d_{CE} S = R(-)(f)##:

$$

\array{

\left\{ S \right\}

&\overset{S^\ast}{\longleftarrow}&

\left\{ x \right\}

\\

{}^{\llap{d_{CE(X/\mathfrak{g})}}}\downarrow

&&

\downarrow^{\rlap{d_{CE(\mathbb{R}^1)} = 0 } }

\\

\left\{

R(-)(S)

=

0

\right\}

&\underset{S^\ast}{\longleftarrow}&

\left\{ 0 \right\}

}

$$

Given a gauge-invariant function, hence a function ##S \colon X/\mathfrak{g} \to \mathbb{R}## on a Lie algebroid (example 11.2), its exterior derivative ##d S## should be a section of the cotangent bundle of the Lie algebroid. Moreover, if all field variations are infinitesimal (as in def. 7.42) then it should in fact be a section of the infinitesimal neighborhood (example 3.30) of the zero section inside the cotangent bundle, the *infinitesimal cotangent bundle* ##T^\ast_{inf}(X/\mathfrak{g})## of the Lie algebroid (def. 11.3 below).

To motivate the definition 11.3 below of *infinitesimal cotangent bundle of a Lie algebroid* recall from example 3.30 that the algebra of functions on the infinitesimal cotangent bundle should be fiberwise the formal power series algebra in the linear functions. But a fiberwise linear function on a cotangent bundle is by definition a vector field. Finally, observe that vector fields are equivalently derivations of smooth functions (prop. 1.15). This leads to the following definition:

###### Definition 11.3. **(infinitesimal cotangent Lie algebroid)**

Let ##\mathfrak{a}## be a Lie ∞-algebroid (def. 10.22) over some manifold ##X##. Then its *infinitesimal cotangent bundle* ##T^\ast_{inf} \mathfrak{a}## is the Lie ∞-algebroid over ##X## whose underlying graded module over ##C^\infty(X)## is the direct sum of the original module with the derivations of the graded algebra underlying ##CE(\mathfrak{a})##:

$$

(T^\ast_{inf} \mathfrak{a})^\ast_\bullet

\;:=\;

\mathfrak{a}^\ast_\bullet \oplus Der(CE(\mathfrak{a}))_\bullet

$$

with differential on the summand ##\mathfrak{a}## being the original differential and on ##Der(CE(\mathfrak{a}))## being the graded commutator with the differential ##d_{CE(\mathfrak{a})}## on ##CE(\mathfrak{a})## (which is itself a graded derivation of degree +1):

$$

\array{

\llap{ d_{CE(T^\ast_{inf} \mathfrak{a})} }

&\rlap{ \vert_{\mathfrak{a}^\ast} }&

&

:= & d_{CE(\mathfrak{a})}

\\

\llap{ d_{CE(T^\ast_{inf} \mathfrak{a})} }

& \rlap{ \vert_{Der(\mathfrak{a})} } &

\phantom{ \vert_{Der(\mathfrak{a})} }

&

:= & [d_{CE(\mathfrak{a})},-]

}

$$

Just as for ordinary cotangent bundles (def. 1.16) there is a canonical homomorphism of Lie algebroids (def. 11.1) from the infinitesimal cotangent Lie algebroid down to the base Lie algebroid:

$$ \label{CotangentLieAlgebrpoidProjection} \array{ T^\ast_{inf} \mathfrak{a} &\phantom{AAA}&& CE(T^\ast_{inf} \mathfrak{g}) &=& CE(\mathfrak{a}) &\oplus& \wedge^{\bullet \geq 1}_{CE(\mathfrak{a})} Der(\mathfrak{a}) \\ \downarrow^{\rlap{cb}} &&& \uparrow^{\rlap{cb^\ast}} && \uparrow^{\rlap{id}} && \uparrow^{\rlap{0}} \\ \mathfrak{a} &&& CE(\mathfrak{a}) &=& CE(\mathfrak{a}) &\oplus& 0 } $$ | (172) |

given dually by the identity on the original generators.

###### Example 11.4. **(infinitesimal cotangent bundle of action Lie algebroid)**

Let ##X/\mathfrak{g}## be an action Lie algebroid (def. 10.21) whose Chevalley-Eilenberg differential is given in local coordinates by (167)

$$

d_{CE(X/\mathfrak{g})}

\;=\;

\tfrac{1}{2}\gamma^\alpha{}_{\beta \gamma} c^\beta c^\gamma \frac{\partial}{\partial c^\alpha}

+

c^\alpha R_a^\alpha \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi^a}

\,.

$$

Then its infinitesimal cotangent Lie algebroid ##T^\ast_{inf} (X/\mathfrak{g})## (def. 11.3) has the generators

$$

\array{

&

\left(

\frac{\partial}{\partial c^\alpha}

\right)

&

\left(

\phi^a

\right)

,

\left(

\frac{\partial}{\partial \phi^a}

\right)

&

\left(

c^\alpha

\right)

\\

deg =

&

-1

&

0

&

+1

}

$$

and we find that CE-differential on the new derivation generators is given by

$$ \label{CotangentLieAlgebroidDifferentialForActionLieAlgebroidOnGhostFieldCoordinates} \begin{aligned} d_{CE(T^\ast_{inf}(X/\mathfrak{g}))} \left( \frac{\partial}{\partial c^\alpha} \right) & := \left[d_{CE(X/\mathfrak{g})}, \frac{\partial}{\partial c^\alpha} \right] \\ & = R_\alpha^a \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi^a} + \gamma^\beta{}_{\alpha \gamma} c^\gamma \frac{\partial}{\partial c^\beta} \end{aligned} $$ | (173) |

and

$$ \label{CotangentLieAlgebroidDifferentialForActionLieAlgebroidOnFieldCoordinates} \begin{aligned} d_{CE(T^\ast_{inf}(X/\mathfrak{g}))} \left( \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi^a} \right) & := \left[ d_{CE(X/\mathfrak{g})}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi^a} \right] \\ & = – c^\alpha \frac{\partial R_\alpha^b}{\partial \phi^a} \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi^b} \end{aligned} \,. $$ | (174) |

To amplify that the derivations *on* ##CE(X/\mathfrak{g})##, such as ##\frac{\partial}{\partial \phi^a}## and ##\frac{\partial}{\partial c^\alpha}##, are now coordinate functions *in* ##CE(T^\ast_{inf}(X/\mathfrak{g}))## one writes them as

$$ \label{AntiNotationForDerivations} \phi^\ddagger_a \;:=\; \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi^a} \phantom{AAAAA} c\ddagger_\alpha \;:=\; \frac{\partial}{\partial c^\alpha} \,. $$ | (175) |

so that the generator content then reads as follows:

$$ \label{GeneratorsOfDerivedCriticalLocusInActionLieAlgebroid} \array{ & \left( c^\ddagger_\alpha \right) & \left( \phi^a \right) , \left( \phi^\ddagger_a \right) & \left( c^\alpha \right) \\ deg = & -1 & 0 & +1 } \,. $$ | (176) |

In this notation the full action of the CE-differential for ##T^\ast_{inf}(X/\mathfrak{g})## is therefore the following:

$$ \label{CEDifferentialOnGeneratorsForInfinitesimalCotangentBundleOfActionLieAlgebroid} \array{ & d_{CE(T^\ast_{inf}(X/\mathfrak{g}))} \\ \phi^a &\mapsto& c^\alpha R^a_\alpha \\ c^\alpha & \mapsto& \tfrac{1}{2} \gamma^\alpha{}_{\beta \gamma} c^\beta c^\gamma \\ \phi^\ddagger_a &\mapsto& – c^\alpha \frac{\partial R_\alpha^b}{\partial \phi^a} \phi^\ddagger_b \\ c^\ddagger_\alpha &\mapsto& R_\alpha^a \phi^\ddagger_a + \gamma^\beta{}_{\alpha \gamma} c^\gamma c^\ddagger_\beta } $$ | (177) |

With a concept of cotangent bundles for Lie algebroids in hand, we want to see next that their sections are differential 1-forms on a Lie algebroid in an appropriate sense:

###### Proposition 11.5. **(exterior differential of invariant function is section of infinitesimal cotangent bundle)**

For ##\mathfrak{a}## a Lie ∞-algebroid (def. 10.22) over some ##X##; and ##S \;\colon\;\mathfrak{a} \longrightarrow \mathbb{R}## a invariant smooth function on it (example 11.2) there is an induced section ##d S## of the infinitesimal cotangent Lie algebroid (def. 11.3) bundle projection (172):

$$

\array{

&& T^\ast_{inf} \mathfrak{a}

\\

& {}^{\llap{d S}}\nearrow & \downarrow^{\rlap{cb}}

\\

\mathfrak{a}

&=&

\mathfrak{a}

}

\,,

$$

given dually by the homomorphism of differential graded-commutative superalgebras

$$

(d S)^\ast \;\colon\; CE(T^\ast_{inf} \mathfrak{a}) \longrightarrow CE(\mathfrak{a})

$$

which sends

- the generators in ##\mathfrak{a}^\ast## to themselves;
- a vector field ##v## on ##X##, regarded as a degree-0 derivation to ##d S(v) = v(S) \in C^\infty(X)##;
- all other derivations to zero.

**Proof.** We discuss the proof in the special case that ##\mathfrak{a} = X/\mathfrak{g}## is an action Lie algebroid (def. 10.21) hence where ##T^\ast_{inf}(\mathfrak{a}) = T^\ast_{inf}(X/\mathfrak{g})## is as in example 11.4. The general case is directly analogous.

Since ##(d S)^\ast## has been defined on generators, it is uniquely a homomorphism of graded algebras. It is clear that if ##(d S)^\ast## is indeed a homomorphism of differential graded-commutative superalgebras in that it also respects the CE-differentials, then it yields a section as claimed because by definition it is the identity on ##\mathfrak{a}^\ast##. Hence all we need to check is that ##(d S)^\ast## indeed respects the CE-differentials.

On the original generators in ##\mathfrak{a}^\ast## this is immediate since on these the CE-differential on both sides are by definition the same.

On the derivation ##\phi^\ddagger_a := \frac{\partial}{ \partial \phi^a}## we find from (174)

$$

\array{

\left\{

\frac{\partial S}{\partial \phi^a}

\right\}

&\overset{(d S)^\ast}{\longleftarrow}&

\left\{ \phi^\ddagger_a \right\}

\\

{}^{\llap{d_{CE(X/\mathfrak{g})}}}\downarrow

&&

\downarrow^{\rlap{d_{CE(T^\ast_{inf} (X/\mathfrak{g}))}}}

\\

\left\{

-c^\alpha \frac{\partial R_\alpha^b}{\partial \phi^a} \frac{\partial S}{\partial \phi^b}

\right\}

&\underset{(d S)^\ast}{\longleftarrow}&

\left\{

-c^\alpha \frac{\partial R_\alpha^b}{\partial \phi^a} \phi^\ddagger_b

\right\}

}

$$

{#NoticeThatTheLeftVerticalMap} Notice that the left vertical map is true as shown, due to the invariance of ##S## (example 11.2), which allows an “integration by parts”:

$$

\begin{aligned}

d_{CE(X/\mathfrak{g})}\left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial \phi_a} \right)

& =

c^\alpha R_\alpha^{b} \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi^b} \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi^a} S

\\

& =

\frac{\partial}{\partial \phi^a}

\left(

c^\alpha

\underset{

= 0

}{

\underbrace{

R_\alpha^b \frac{\partial S}{\partial \phi^b}

}

}

\right)

\;-\;

c^\alpha \frac{\partial R_\alpha^b}{\partial \phi^a}

\frac{\partial S}{\partial \phi^b}

\end{aligned}

$$

Similarly, on the derivation ##c^\ddagger_\alpha := \frac{\partial}{\partial c^\alpha}## we find from (173) and using the invariance of ##S## (example 11.2)

$$

\array{

\left\{

0

\right\}

&\overset{(d S)^\ast}{\longleftarrow}&

\left\{

c^\ddagger_\alpha

\right\}

\\

{}^{\llap{d_{CE(X/\mathfrak{g})}}}\downarrow

&&

\downarrow^{\rlap{d_{CE(T^\ast_{inf}(X/\mathfrak{g}))}}}

\\

\left\{

0 = R_\alpha^a \frac{\partial S}{\partial \phi^a}

\right\}

&\underset{(d S)^\ast}{\longleftarrow}&

\left\{

R_\alpha^a \phi^\ddagger_a

+

\gamma^\beta{}_{\alpha \gamma} c^\gamma

c^\ddagger_\alpha

\right\}

}

\,.

$$

This shows that the differentials are being respected.

Next, we describe the vanishing locus of ##d S##, hence the critical locus of ##S##. Notice that if ##d S## is regarded as an ordinary differential 1-form on an ordinary smooth manifold ##X##, then its ordinary vanishing locus

$$

X_{d S = 0}

\;=\;

\left\{

x \in X \;\vert\;

d S(x) = 0

\right\}

$$

is simply the fiber product of ##d S## with the zero section of the cotangent bundle, hence the universal space that makes the following diagram commute:

$$

\array{

X_{d S = 0}

&\overset{\phantom{AAA}}{\hookrightarrow}&

X

\\

\downarrow && \downarrow^{\rlap{0}}

\\

X &\underset{d S}{\longrightarrow}& T^\ast_{inf} X

}

\,.

$$

This is just the general abstract way to express the equation ##d S = 0##.

In this general abstract form, the concept of critical locus generalizes to invariant functions on super Lie algebroids, where the vanishing of ##d S## is regarded only *up to homotopy*, namely up to infinitesimal symmetry transformations by the Lie algebra ##\mathfrak{g}##. In this homotopy-theoretic refinement, we speak of the *derived critical locus*. The following definition simply states what this comes down to in components. For a detailed derivation see at a *derived critical locus* and for a general introduction to higher differential geometry and higher Lie theory see at Higher* structures in Physics*.

###### Definition 11.6. **(derived critical locus of invariant function on Lie ∞-algebroid)**

Let ##\mathfrak{a}## be a Lie ∞-algebroid (def. 10.22) over some ##X##, let

$$

S \;\colon\; \mathfrak{a} \longrightarrow \mathbb{R}

$$

be an invariant function (example 11.2) and consider the section of its infinitesimal cotangent bundle ##T^\ast_{inf} \mathfrak{a}## (def. 11.4) corresponding to its exterior derivative via prop. 11.5:

$$

\array{

\mathfrak{a} && \overset{d S}{\longrightarrow} && T^\ast_{inf} \mathfrak{a}

\\

& {}_{\llap{id}}\searrow && \swarrow_{\rlap{cb}}

\\

&& \mathfrak{a}

}

$$

Then the *derived critical locus* of ##S## is the derived Lie algebroid (def. 10.22) to be denoted ##\mathfrak{a}_{d S \simeq 0}## which is the homotopy pullback of the section ##d S## along the zero section:

$$

\array{

\mathfrak{a}_{d S \simeq 0}

&\longrightarrow&

\mathfrak{a}

\\

\downarrow &(pb)& \downarrow^{\rlap{0}}

\\

\mathfrak{a}

&\underset{d S}{\longrightarrow}&

T^\ast_{inf} \mathfrak{a}

}

\,.

$$

This means equivalently (details are at *derived critical locus*) that the Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra of ##\mathfrak{a}_{d S \simeq 0}## is like that of the infinitesimal cotangent Lie algebroid ##T^\ast_{inf} \mathfrak{a}## (def. 11.3) except for two changes:

- all derivations are shifted down in degree by one;rephrased in terms of graded manifold (remark 10.23) this means that the graded manifold underlying ##\mathfrak{a}_{d S \simeq 0}## is ##T^\ast_{inf}[-1]\mathfrak{a}##;
- the Chevalley-Eilenberg differential on the derivations coming from tangent vector fields ##v## on ##X## is that of the infinitesimal cotangent Lie algebroid ##T^\ast_{inf} \mathfrak{a}## plus ##d S(v) = v(S)##.

We now make the general concept of derived critical locus inside an L-∞ algebroid (def. 11.6) explicit in our running example of an action Lie algebroid; the reader not concerned with the general idea of homotopy pullbacks may consider the following example as the definition of derived critical locus for the purposes of our running examples:

###### Example 11.7. **(derived critical locus inside action Lie algebroid)**

Consider an invariant function (def. 11.2) on an action Lie algebroid (def. 10.21)

$$

S \;\colon\; X/\mathfrak{g} \overset{\phantom{AAA}}{\longrightarrow} \mathbb{R}

$$

for the case that the underlying supermanifold ##X## is a super Cartesian space (def. 3.37) with global coordinates ##(\phi^a)## as in example 11.4. Then the derived critical locus (def. 11.6)

$$

(X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}

$$

is, in terms of its Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra ##CE\left( (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0} \right)## (def. 10.22) given as follows:

Its generators are those of ##CE\left( T^\ast_{inf}(X/\mathfrak{g}) \right)## as in (176), except for a shift of degree of the derivation-generators down by one:

$$

\array{

&

\left(

c^\ddagger_{\alpha}

\right)

&

\left(

\phi^\ddagger_a

\right)

&

\left(

\phi^a

\right)

&

\left(

c^\alpha

\right)

\\

deg = &

-2

&

-1

&

0

&

+1

}

$$

Rephrased in terms of graded manifold (remark 10.23) this means that the graded manifold underlying the derived critical locus is the *shifted infinitesimal cotangent bundle* of the graded manifold ##\mathfrak{g}[1] \times X## (166) which underlies the action Lie algebroid (def. 10.21):

$$ \label{ShiftedCotangentBundleForCriticalLocusInsideLieAlgebroid} (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0} \;=_{grmfd}\; T^\ast_{inf}[-1]\left( \mathfrak{g}[1] \times X \right) $$ | (178) |

and if ##X = \mathbb{R}^{b\vert s}## is a super Cartesian space this becomes more specifically

$$

\begin{aligned}

(\mathbb{R}^{p \vert q}/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}

& =_{grmfd}

T^\ast_{inf}[-1]\left( \mathfrak{g}[1] \times \mathbb{R}^{p \vert q} \right)

\\

& =_{\phantom{grmfd}}

\underset{

(c^\alpha)

}{

\underbrace{

\mathfrak{g}[1]

}}

\times

\underset{ (\phi^a) }{

\underbrace{

\mathbb{R}^{p\vert q}

}}

\times

\underset{ (\phi^\ddagger_a) }{

\underbrace{

(\mathbb{R}^{p \vert q})^\ast_{inf}[-1]

}}

\times

\underset{ (c^\ddagger_\alpha) }{

\underbrace{

\mathfrak{g}^\ast[-2]

}}

\end{aligned}

$$

Moreover, on these generators, the CE-differential is given by

$$ \label{ExplicitCEDifferentialInCotangentBundleOfActionLieAlgebroid} \array{ & d_{CE\left((X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}\right)} \\ \phi^a &\mapsto& c^\alpha R^a_\alpha \\ c^\alpha & \mapsto& \tfrac{1}{2} \gamma^\alpha{}_{\beta \gamma} c^\beta c^\gamma \\ \phi^\ddagger_a &\mapsto& \underset{ new }{ \underbrace{ \frac{\partial S}{\partial \phi^a} }} – c^\alpha \frac{\partial R_\alpha^b}{\partial \phi^a} \phi^\ddagger_b \\ c^\ddagger_\alpha &\mapsto& R_\alpha^a \phi^\ddagger_a + \gamma^\beta{}_{\alpha \gamma} c^\gamma c^\ddagger_b } $$ | (179) |

which is just the expression for the differential (177) in ##CE\left( T^\ast_{inf}(X/\mathfrak{g}) \right)## from example 11.4, except for the fact that (the derivations are shifted down in degree and) the new term ##\frac{\partial S}{\partial \phi^a}## over the brace.

The following example illustrates how the concept of derived critical locus ##X_{d S \simeq 0}## of ##S## is a homotopy theoretic version of the ordinary concept of critical locus ##X_{d S = 0}##:

###### Example 11.8. **(ordinary critical locus is cochain cohomology of the derived critical locus in degree 0)**

Let ##X## be a superpoint (def. 3.37) or more generally the infinitesimal neighborhood (example 3.30) of a point in super Cartesian space (def. 3.37) with coordinate functions ##(\phi^a)##, so that its algebra of functions ##C^\infty(X)## is a truncated polynomial algebra or formal power series algebra in the variables ##\phi^a##.

Consider for simplicity the special case that ##\mathfrak{g} = 0## so that there is no Lie algebra action on ##X##.

Then the Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra of the derived critical locus ##X_{d S \simeq 0}## of ##S## (example 11.7) has generators

$$

\begin{aligned}

&

&

\left(

\phi^\ddagger_a

\right)

&

\left(

\phi^a

\right)

&

\\

deg = &

&

-1

&

0

&

\end{aligned}

$$

and differential is given by

$$

\array{

& d_{CE\left( X_{d S \simeq 0} \right)}

\\

\phi^a &\mapsto& 0

\\

\phi^\ddagger_a &\mapsto& \frac{\partial S}{\partial \phi^a}

}

\,.

$$

Hence the cochain cohomology of the Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra of the derived critical locus indegree 0 is the quotient of ##C^\infty(X)## by the ideal which is generated by ##\left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial \phi^a} \right)##

$$

H^0\left(

CE\left( X_{d S \simeq 0} \right)

\right)

\;=\;

C^\infty(X)/\left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial \phi^a} \right)

\,.

$$

But under the assumption that ##X## is a superpoint or infinitesimal neighborhood of a point, this quotient algebra is just the algebra of functions on the ordinary critical locus ##X_{d S = 0}##.

(The quotient says that every function on ##X## which vanishes where ##\frac{\partial S}{\partial \phi^a}## vanishes is zero in the quotient. This means that the quotient algebra consists of the functions on ##X## modulo the zero equivalence relation that identifies two if they agree on the critical locus ##X_{d S = 0}##, which is the functions on ##X_{d S = 0}##.)

Hence the derived critical locus yields the ordinary critical locus in cochain cohomology:

$$

H^0\left(

CE\left( X_{d S \simeq 0} \right)

\right)

\;\simeq\;

C^\infty\left( X_{d S = 0} \right)

\,.

$$

However, it is not, in general, the case that the derived critical locus is a resolution of the ordinary critical locus, in that all its cohomology in negative degree vanishes. Instead, the cohomology of the Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra of a derived critical locus in negative degree detects Lie algebra action and more generally L-∞ algebra action on ##X## under which ##S## is invariant. If this action is incorporated into ##X## by bassing to the action Lie algebroid by passing to the action Lie algebroid ##X/\mathfrak[g}## and then forming the derived critical locus ##(X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}## in there, as in example 11.7.

This issue we discuss in detail in the chapter *Gauge fixing*, see prop. 10.4 below.

In order to generalize the statement of example 11.8 to the case that a Lie algebra action is taken into account, we need to realize the Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra of a derived critical locus in a Lie algebroid is the total complex of a double complex:

###### Proposition 11.9. **(Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra of derived critical locus is the total complex of BV-BRST bicomplex)**

Let ##(X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}## be a derived critical locus inside an action Lie algebroid as in example 11.7. Then its Chevalley-Eilenberg differential (179) may be decomposed as the sum of two anti-commuting differential

$$

d_{CE\left( (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0} \right)}

\;=\;

s_{BRST} + s_{BS}

$$

which are defined on the generators of the Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra as follows:

$$ \label{ExplicitBVandBRSTDifferentialInCotangentBundleOfActionLieAlgebroid} \array{ & s_{BV} \\ \phi^a &\mapsto& 0 \\ c^\alpha & \mapsto& 0 \\ \phi^\ddagger_a &\mapsto& \frac{\partial S}{\partial \phi^a} \\ c^\ddagger_\alpha &\mapsto& R_\alpha^a \phi^\ddagger_a \\ \phantom{A} \\ & s_{BRST} \\ \phi^a &\mapsto& c^\alpha R^a_\alpha \\ c^\alpha & \mapsto& \tfrac{1}{2} \gamma^\alpha{}_{\beta \gamma} c^\beta c^\gamma \\ \phi^\ddagger_a &\mapsto& – c^\alpha \frac{\partial R_\alpha^b}{\partial \phi^a} \phi^\ddagger_b \\ c^\ddagger_\alpha &\mapsto& \gamma^\beta{}_{\alpha \gamma} c^\gamma c^\ddagger_b } $$ | (180) |

If we moreover decompose the degree of the generators into two degrees

$$

\array{

&

\left(

c^\ddagger_{\alpha}

\right)

&

\left(

\phi^\ddagger_a

\right)

&

\left(

\phi^a

\right)

&

\left(

c^\alpha

\right)

\\

deg_{gh} =

&

0

&

0

&

0

&

+1

\\

deg_{af} =

&

-2

&

-1

&

0

&

0

}

$$

then these two differentials constitute a bicomplex

$$

\array{

CE^{0,0}\left( (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}\right)

&\overset{s_{BRST}}{\longrightarrow}&

CE^{1,0}\left( (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}\right)

&\overset{s_{BRST}}{\longrightarrow}&

CE^{2,0}\left( (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}\right)

&\overset{s_{BRST}}{\longrightarrow}&

\cdots

\\

\big\uparrow^{\rlap{s_{BV}}}

&&

\big\uparrow^{\rlap{s_{BV}}}

&&

\big\uparrow^{\rlap{s_{BV}}}

&&

\\

CE^{0,-1}\left( (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}\right)

&\overset{s_{BRST}}{\longrightarrow}&

CE^{1,-1}\left( (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}\right)

&\overset{s_{BRST}}{\longrightarrow}&

CE^{2,-1}\left( (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}\right)

&\overset{s_{BRST}}{\longrightarrow}&

\cdots

\\

\big\uparrow^{\rlap{s_{BV}}}

&&

\big\uparrow^{\rlap{s_{BV}}}

&&

\big\uparrow^{\rlap{s_{BV}}}

&&

\\

CE^{0,-2}\left( (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}\right)

&\overset{s_{BRST}}{\longrightarrow}&

CE^{1,-2}\left( (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}\right)

&\overset{s_{BRST}}{\longrightarrow}&

CE^{2,-2}\left( (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}\right)

&\overset{s_{BRST}}{\longrightarrow}&

\cdots

\\

\big\uparrow^{\rlap{s_{BV}}}

&&

\big\uparrow^{\rlap{s_{BV}}}

&&

\big\uparrow^{\rlap{s_{BV}}}

&&

\\

\vdots && \vdots && \vdots

}

$$

whose total complex is the Chevalley-Eilenberg dg-algebra of the derived critical locus

$$

\begin{aligned}

CE\left(

(X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}

\right)

& =

\underset{ gh, af }{\bigoplus}

CE^{gh,af}\left(

(X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}

\right)

\\

d_CE\left( (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0} \right){}

& =

s_{BV} + s_{BRST}

\end{aligned}

\,.

$$

**Proof.** It is clear from the definition that the graded derivations ##s_{BV}## and ##s_{BRST}## have (i.e. increase) bidegree as follows:

$$

\array{

& s_{BRST} & s_{BV}

\\

deg_{gh} = & +1 & 0

\\

deg_{af} = & 0 & +1

}

\,.

$$

This implies that in

$$

\begin{aligned}

0 & =

\left( d_{CE\left( (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0} \right)} \right)^2

\\

& =

\left( s_{BV} + s_{BRST}\right)^2

\\

& =

\underset{ = 0 }{

\underbrace{

\left( s_{BV}\right)^2

}}

+

\underset{ = 0 }{

\underbrace{

\left( s_{BRST} \right)^2

}}

+

\underset{ = 0 }{

\underbrace{

\left[ s_{BV}, s_{BRST} \right]

}

}

\end{aligned}

$$

all three terms have to vanish separately, as shown since they each have a different bidegree (the last term denotes the graded commutator, hence the anticommutator). This is the statement to be proven.

Notice that the nilpotency of ##s_{BV}## is also immediately checked explicitly, due to the invariance of ##S## (example 11.2):

$$

\begin{aligned}

s_{BV} \left( s_{BV} \left( c^\ddagger_\alpha \right) \right)

& =

s_BV\left( R_\alpha^a \phi^\ddagger_a \right)

\\

& =

R_\alpha^a \frac{\partial S}{\partial \phi^a}

\\

& = 0

\end{aligned}

$$

As a corollary of prop. \refDerivedCriticalLocusOfActionLiAlgebroidBicomplexStructure{} we obtain the generalization of example 11.8 to non-trivial ##\mathfrak{g}##-actions:

###### Proposition 11.10. **(cochain cohomology of BV-BRST complex in degree 0 is the invariant function on the critical locus)**

Let ##(X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}## be a derived critical locus inside an action Lie algebroid as in example 11.7.

Then if the vertical differential (prop. 11.9)

$$

\array{

CE^{\bullet, \bullet+1}\left( (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0} \right)

\\

\uparrow^{\rlap{s_{BV}}}

\\

CE^{\bullet, \bullet}\left( (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0} \right)

}

$$

has vanishing cochain cohomology in negative ##af##-degree

$$ \label{VanishingOfNaiveLieAlgebroidBVCohomlogyInNegativeDegree} H^{\bullet \leq 1}(s_{BV}) = 0 $$ | (181) |

then the cochain cohomology of the full Chevalley-Eilenberg dg-algebra is given by the cochain cohomology of ##s_{BRST}## on ##H^0(s_{BV})##:

$$

H^k\left(

CE\left(

(X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}

\right)

\right)

\;\simeq\;

H^k\left( H^0(s_{BV}), s_{BRST} \right)

\,.

$$

Moreover, if ##X## is inside the infinitesimal neighborhood of a point as in example 11.8 then the full cochain cohomology in degree 0 is the space of those functions on the ordinary critical locus ##X_{d S = 0}## which are ##\mathfrak{g}##-invariant:

$$

H^0

\left(

CE\left(

(X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}

\right)

\right)

\;=\;

\left\{

X_{d S = 0}

\overset{f}{\to}

\mathbb{R}

\;\vert\;

\left(R_\alpha^a \frac{\partial f}{\partial \phi^a} = 0\right)

\right\}

$$

**Proof.** The first statement follows from the spectral sequence of the double complex

$$

H^{gh}

\left(

H^{af}

\left(

CE\left( (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0} \right)

\right)

\right)

\;\Rightarrow\;

H^{gh + af}\left(

CE\left( (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0} \right)

\right)

\,.

$$

Under the given assumption the second page of this spectral sequence is concentrated on the row ##af = 0##. This implies that all differentials on this page vanish so that the sequence collapses on this page. Moreover, since the spectral sequence consists of vector spaces (modules over the real numbers) the extension problem is trivial, and hence the claim follows.

Now if ##X## is inside the infinitesimal neighborhood of a point, then example 11.8 says that ##H^0(s_{BV})## in ##deg_{gh} = 0## consists of the functions on the ordinary critical locus and hence the above result implies that

$$

\begin{aligned}

H^0\left( CE\left( (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}\right) \right)

& =

ker(s_{BRST})\vert_{C^\infty\left( X_{d S = 0} \right) }

\,/\,

\underset{= 0}{

\underbrace{

im(s_{BRST})\vert_{C^\infty\left( X_{d S = 0} \right)}

}

}

\\

& = ker(s_{BRST})\vert_{C^\infty\left( X_{d S = 0} \right) }

\\

& =

\left\{

X_{d S = 0} \overset{f}{\longrightarrow} \mathbb{R}

\,\vert\,

\left(

R_\alpha^a \frac{\partial S}{\partial \phi^a}

=

0

\right)

\right\}

\end{aligned}

$$

This means that under condition (181) the construction of a derived critical locus inside an action Lie algebroid provides a resolution of the space of those functions which are

*restricted*to the critical locus (a homotopy intersection);*invariant*under the Lie algebra action (a homotopy quotient).

We apply this general mechanism below to Lagrangian field theory, where it serves to provide a resolution by the *BV-BRST complex* of the space of observables that are

- on-shell,
*gauge invariant*.

But in order to control this application, we first establish the tool of the *Schouten bracket/antibracket*.

**Schouten bracket/antibracket**

Since the infinitesimal cotangent Lie algebroid ##T^\ast_{inf} \mathfrak{a}## has function algebra given by tensor products of tangent vector fields/derivations, we expect that a graded analogue of the Lie bracket of ordinary tangent vector fields exists on the Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra ##CE\left( T^\ast_{inf} \mathfrak{a}\right)##. This is indeed the case, and crucial for the theory:

###### Definition 11.11. **(Schouten bracket and antibracket for action Lie algebroid)**

Consider a derived critical locus ##(X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}## inside an action Lie algebroid ##X/\mathfrak{g}## as in example 11.7.

Then the graded commutator of graded derivations of the Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra of ##X/\mathfrak{g}##

$$

[-,-]

\;\colon\;

Der(CE(X/\mathfrak{g}))

\otimes

Der(CE(X/\mathfrak{g}))

\longrightarrow

Der(CE(X/\mathfrak{g}))

$$

uniquely extends, by the graded Leibniz rule, to a graded bracket of degree ##(1, even)## on the CE-algebra of the derived critical locus ##(X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}##

$$

\left\{ -,-\right\}

\;\colon\;

CE\left( (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0} \right)

\otimes

C\left( (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0} \right)

\longrightarrow

CE\left( (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0} \right)

$$

such that this is a graded derivation in both arguments.

This is called the *Schouten bracket*.

There is an elegant way to rewrite this in terms of components: With the notation (175) for the coordinate-derivations the Schouten bracket is equivalently given by

$$ \label{Antibracket} \begin{aligned} \left\{ f,g \right\} & = \phantom{+} \frac{\overset{\leftarrow}{\partial} f}{\partial \phi^\ddagger_a} \frac{\overset{\rightarrow}{\partial} g}{\partial {\phi}^a} – \frac{\overset{\leftarrow}{\partial} f}{\partial \phi^a} \frac{\overset{\rightarrow}{\partial} g}{\partial \phi^\ddagger_a} \\ & \phantom{=} + \frac{\overset{\leftarrow}{\partial} f}{\partial c^\ddagger_\alpha} \frac{\overset{\rightarrow}{\partial} g}{\partial {c}^{\alpha}} – \frac{\overset{\leftarrow}{\partial} f}{\partial c^{\alpha}} \frac{\overset{\rightarrow}{\partial} g}{\partial c^\ddagger_\alpha} \end{aligned} \,, $$ | (182) |

where the arrow over the partial derivative indicates that we pick up signs via the Leibniz rule either as usual, going through products from left to right (for ##\overset{\rightarrow}{\partial}##) or by going through the products from right to left (for ##\overset{\leftarrow}{\partial}##).

In this form, the Schouten bracket is called the *antibracket*.

(e. g. Henneaux 90, (53d), Henneaux-Teitelboim 92, section 15.5.2)

The power of the Schouten bracket/antibracket rests in the fact that it makes the Chevalley-Eilenberg differential on a derived critical locus ##(X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}## become a Hamiltonian vector field, for “Hamiltonian” the sum of ##S## with the Chevalley-Eilenberg differential of ##X/\mathfrak{g}##:

###### Example 11.12. **(Chevalley-Eilenberg differential of derived critical locus is Hamiltonian vector field for the Schouten bracket/antibracket)**

Let ##(X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}## be a derived critical locus inside an action Lie algebroid as in example 11.7.

Then the CE-differential (179) of the derived critical locus ##X/\mathfrak{g}\vert_{S \simeq 0}## is simply the Schouten bracket/antibracket (def. 11.11) with the sum

$$ \label{BVBRSTFunctionForActionLieAlgebroid} S_{\text{BV-BRST}} \;:=\; S – d_{CE(X/\mathfrak{g})} $$ | (183) |

of the Chevalley-Eilenberg differential of ##X/\mathfrak{g}## and the function ##-S##:

$$

d_{CE\left( (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0} \right) }(-)

\;=\;

\left\{

– S + d_{CE(X/\mathfrak{g})}

\,,\,

(-)

\right\}

\,.

$$

In coordinates, using the expression for ##d_{CE(X/\mathfrak{g})}## from (167) and using the notation for derivations from (175) this means that

$$

d_{CE\left( (X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0} \right)}(-)

\;=\;

\left\{

– S

+

c^\alpha R_\alpha^a \phi^\ddagger_a

–

\tfrac{1}{2}\gamma^\alpha{}_{\beta \gamma} c^\beta c^\gamma

c^\ddagger_\alpha

\,,\,

(-)

\right\}

\,.

$$

**Proof.** This is a simple straightforward computation, but we spell it out for illustration of the general principle. The result is to be compared with (179):

for ##\phi^a##:

$$

\begin{aligned}

\left\{

– S

+

c^\alpha R_\alpha^{a’} \phi^\ddagger_{a’}

–

\tfrac{1}{2}\gamma^\alpha{}_{\beta \gamma} c^\beta c^\gamma

c^\ddagger_\alpha

\,,\,

\phi^a

\right\}

&

=

\left\{

c^\alpha R_\alpha^{a’} \phi^\ddagger_{a’} \,,\, \phi^a

\right\}

\\

& =

c^\alpha R_\alpha^{a’}

\underset{

\delta_{a’}^a

}{

\underbrace{

\left\{

\phi^\ddagger_{a’} \,,\, \phi^a

\right\}

}

}

\\

& =

c^\alpha R_\alpha^{a}

\end{aligned}

$$

for ##c^\alpha##:

$$

\begin{aligned}

\left\{

– S

+

c^\alpha R_\alpha^{a} \phi^\ddagger_{a}

–

\tfrac{1}{2}\gamma^{\alpha’}{}_{\beta \gamma} c^\beta c^\gamma

c^\ddagger_{\alpha’}

\,,\,

c^\alpha

\right\}

& =

\left\{

\tfrac{1}{2}\gamma^{\alpha’}{}_{\beta \gamma} c^\beta c^\gamma

c^\ddagger_{\alpha’}

\,,\,

c^\alpha

\right\}

\\

& =

\tfrac{1}{2}\gamma^{\alpha’}{}_{\beta \gamma} c^\beta c^\gamma

\underset{

\delta_{\alpha’}^\alpha

}{

\underbrace{

\left\{

c^\ddagger_{\alpha’}

\,,\,

c^\alpha

\right\}

}

}

\\

& =

\tfrac{1}{2}\gamma^{\alpha}{}_{\beta \gamma} c^\beta c^\gamma

\end{aligned}

$$

for ##\phi^\ddagger_a##:

$$

\begin{aligned}

\left\{

– S

+

c^\alpha R_\alpha^{a’} \phi^\ddagger_{a’}

–

\tfrac{1}{2}\gamma^{\alpha}{}_{\beta \gamma} c^\beta c^\gamma

c^\ddagger_{\alpha}

\,,\,

\phi^\ddagger_a

\right\}

& =

–

\underset{

= -\frac{\partial S}{\partial \phi^a}

}{

\underbrace{

\left\{

S \,,\, \phi^{\ddagger}_a

\right\}

}

}

+

\left\{

c^\alpha R_\alpha^{a’} \phi^\ddagger_{a’}

\,,\,

\phi^\ddagger_a

\right\}

\\

& =

\frac{\partial S}{\partial \phi^a}

+ c^\alpha

\underset{

= -\frac{\partial R_\alpha^{a’}}{\partial \phi^a}

}{

\underbrace{

\left\{ R_\alpha^{a’} \,,\, \phi^\ddagger_a \right\}

}

}

\phi^\ddagger_{a’}

\\

& =

\frac{\partial S}{\partial \phi^a}

–

c^\alpha \frac{\partial R_\alpha^{a’}}{\partial \phi^a}

\phi^\ddagger_{a’}

\end{aligned}

$$

for ##c^\ddagger_\alpha##:

$$

\begin{aligned}

\left\{

– S

+

c^{\alpha’} R_{\alpha’}^{a} \phi^\ddagger_{a}

–

\tfrac{1}{2}\gamma^{\alpha’}{}_{\beta \gamma} c^\beta c^\gamma

c^\ddagger_{\alpha’}

\,,\,

c^\ddagger_\alpha

\right\}

& =

\left\{

c^{\alpha’} R_{\alpha’}^a \phi^{\ddagger}_a

\,,\,

c^\ddagger_{\alpha}

\right\}

\;+\;

\left\{

\tfrac{1}{2} \gamma^{\alpha’}{}_{\beta \gamma} c^\beta c^\gamma

c^\ddagger_{\alpha’}

\,,\,

c^\ddagger_\alpha

\right\}

\\

& =

\left\{

c^{\alpha’}

\,,\,

c^\ddagger_{\alpha}

\right\}

R_{\alpha’}^a \phi^{\ddagger}_a

\;+\;

\tfrac{1}{2} \gamma^{\alpha’}{}_{\beta \gamma}

\underset{ = – c^\beta \delta_{\alpha}^\gamma + \delta_{\alpha}^\beta c^\gamma}{

\underbrace{

\left\{

c^\beta c^\gamma

\,,\,

c^\ddagger_\alpha

\right\}

}}

c^\ddagger_{\alpha’}

\\

& =

R_\alpha^a \phi^\ddagger_{a}

+

\gamma^{\alpha’}{}_{\alpha \gamma} c^\gamma c^\ddagger_{\alpha’}

\end{aligned}

$$

Hence these values of the Schouten bracket/antibracket indeed all agree with the values of the CE-differential from (179).

As a corollary we obtain:

###### Proposition 11.13. **(classical master equation)**

Let ##(X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}## be a derived critical locus inside an action Lie algebroid as in example 11.7.

Then the Schouten bracket/antibracket (def. 11.11) of the function ##S_{\text{BV-BRST}}## S_{\text{BV-BRST}}

$$

S_{\text{BV-BRST}}

\;:=\;

S – d_{CE\left( X/\mathfrak{g}\right)}

$$

with itself vanishes:

$$

\left\{

S_{\text{BV-BRST}}

\,,\,

S_{\text{BV-BRST}}

\right\}

\;=\;

0

\,.

$$

Conversely, given a shifted cotangent bundle of the form ##T^\ast[-1](X \times \mathfrak{g}[1])## (178), then the struture of a differential of degree +1 on its algebra of functions is equivalent to a degree-0 element ##S \in C^\infty(T^\ast[-1](X \times \mathfrak{g}[1]))## such that

$$

\left\{

S, S

\right\}

\;=\;

0

\,.

$$

Since therefore this equation controls the structure of derived critical loci once the underlying manifold ##X## and Lie algebra ##\mathfrak{g}## is specified, it is also called the *master equation* and here specifically the *classical master equation*.

This concludes our discussion of plain derived critical loci inside Lie algebroids. Now we turn to apply these considerations about Lagrangian densities on a jet bundle, which are invariant under infinitesimal gauge symmetries generally only up to a total spacetime derivative. By example 11.12 it is clear that this is best understood by first considering the refinement of the Schouten bracket/antibracket to this situation.

**local antibracket**

If we think of the invariant function ##S## in def. 11.6 as being the action functional (example 7.34) of a Lagrangian field theory ##(E,\mathbf{L})## (def. 5.1) over a compact spacetime ##\Sigma##, with ##X## the space of field histories (or rather an infinitesimal neighborhood therein), hence with ##\mathfrak{g}## a Lie algebra of gauge symmetries acting on the field histories, then the Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra ##CE\left((X/\mathfrak{g})_{d S \simeq 0}\right)## of the derived critical locus of ##S## is called the *BV-BRST complex* of the theory.

In applications of interest, the spacetime ##\Sigma## is *not* compact. In that case one may still appeal to construction on the space of field histories as in example 11.7 by considering the action functional for all adiabatically switched ##b \mathbf{L}## Lagrangians, with ##b \in C_{cp}^\infty(\Sigma)##. This approach is taken in (Fredenhagen-Rejzner 11a).

Here we instead consider now the “local lift” or “de-transgression” of the above construction from the space of field histories to the jet bundle of the field bundle of the theory, refining the BV-BRST complex (prop. 11.9) to the *local BV-BRST complex* (prop. 11.21 below), corresponding to the local BRST complex from example 10.28 (Barnich-Brandt-Henneaux 00).

This requires a slight refinement of the construction that leads to example 11.7: In contrast to the action functional ##S = \tau_\Sigma(g\mathbf{L})## (example 7.34), the Lagrangian density ##\mathbf{L}## is not strictly *invariant* under infinitesimal gauge transformations, in general, rather it may change up to a horizontally exact term (by the very definition 10.5). The same is then true, in general, for its Euler-Lagrange variational derivative ##\delta_{EL} \mathbf{L}## (unless we have already restricted to the shell, by prop. 6.16, which however here we do not explicitly, but only via passing to cochain cohomology as in example 11.8).

This means that the Euler-Lagrange form ##\delta_{EL} \mathbf{L}## is, off-shell, not a section of the infinitesimal cotangent bundle (def. 11.3) of the gauge action Lie algebroid on the jet bundle.

But it turns out that it still is a section of local refinement of the cotangent bundle, which is twisted by horizontally exact terms (prop. 11.19 below). To see the required twist, it is most convenient to make use of a local version of the antibracket (def. 11.15 below), via local refinement of example 11.12. As a result, we may form the *local* derived critical locus as in def. 11.6 but now with the invariance of the Lagrangian density only up to total spacetime derivatives taken into account. Its Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra is called the *local BV-BRST complex* (prop. 11.21 below).

The following is the direct refinement of the concept of the underlying graded manifold of the infinitesimal cotangent bundle of an action Lie algebroid in example 11.4 to the case where the base manifold is generalized to a field bundle (def. 3.1) and the Lie algebra to a gauge parameter bundle (def. 10.5):

###### Definition 11.14. **(infinitesimal neighborhood of zero section in the cotangent bundle of fiber product of field bundle with shifted gauge parameter bundle)**

Let ##(E,\mathbf{L})## be a Lagrangian field theory (def. 5.1) over some spacetime ##\Sigma##, and let ##\mathcal{G} \overset{gb}{\to} \Sigma## be a bundle of gauge parameters (def. 10.6) which are closed (def. 10.26), inducing the Lie algebroid

$$

E / ( \mathcal{G} \times_\Sigma T \Sigma )

\;=\;

\left(

J^\infty_\Sigma( E \times_\Sigma (\mathcal{G}[1]) )

,

s_{BRST} )

\right)

$$

whose Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra is the *local BRST complex* of the field theory (example 10.28).

Then we write

$$

T^\ast_{\Sigma,inf}\left(

E \times_\Sigma (\mathcal{G}[1])

\right)

\,,

\phantom{AAA}

T^\ast_{\Sigma,inf}[-1]\left(

E \times_\Sigma (\mathcal{G}[1])

\right)

$$

for, on the left, the infinitesimal neighborhood of the zero section of the vertical cotangent bundle of the graded fiber product of the field bundle with the fiber-wise shifted gauge parameter bundle, as well as its shifted version on the right, as in (178).

In local coordinates this means the following: Assuming that the field bundle ##E## and the gauge parameter bundle ##\mathcal{G}## are trivial vector bundles (example 3.4) with fiber coordinates ##(\phi^a)## and ##(c^\alpha)##, respectively, then ##T^\ast_{\Sigma,inf}\left(E \times_\Sigma (\mathcal{G}[1])\right)## is the trivial graded vector bundle with fiber coordinates

$$ \label{coordslocalOnInfinitesimalCotangentOfFieldBundleTimesGaugeParameterBundle} \array{ T^\ast_{\Sigma,inf}\left( E \times_\Sigma (\mathcal{G}[1]) \right) & \phantom{AAAAA}& T^\ast_{\Sigma,inf}[-1]\left( E \times_\Sigma (\mathcal{G}[1]) \right) \\ & \phantom{A} \\ \array{ & (c^\ddagger_\alpha), & (\phi^\ddagger_a),(\phi^a), & (c^\alpha) \\ deg = & -1 & 0 & 1 } & \phantom{AA}& \array{ & (c^\ddagger_\alpha), & (\phi^\ddagger_a)\, & (\phi^a), & (c^\alpha) \\ deg = & -2 & -1 & 0 & 1 } } $$ | (184) |

and such that smooth functions on ##T^\ast_{\Sigma,inf}\left(E \times_\Sigma (\mathcal{G}[1])\right)## are formal power series in ##c^\ddagger_\alpha## (necessarily due to degree reasons) and in ##\phi^\ddagger_a## (reflecting the infinitesimal neighbourhood of the zero section).

Here the shifted cotangents to the fields are called the *antifields*:

- ##\phi^\ddagger_a## is
*antifield*to the field ##\phi^a## - ##c^\ddagger_\alpha## is
*antifield*to the ghost field ##c^\alpha##.

The following is the direct refinement of the concept of the Schouten bracket on an action Lie algebroid from def. 11.11 to the case where the base manifold is generalized to the jet bundle (def. 4.1) field bundle (def. 3.1) and the Lie algebra to the jet bundle of a gauge parameter bundle (def. 10.5):

###### Definition 11.15. **(local antibracket)**

Let ##(E,\mathbf{L})## be a Lagrangian field theory (def. 5.1) over Minkowski spacetime ##\Sigma## (def. 2.17), and let ##\mathcal{G} \overset{gb}{\to} \Sigma## be a bundle of gauge parameters (def. 10.6) which are closed (def. 10.26), inducing via example 10.28 the Lie algebroid

$$

E / ( \mathcal{G} \times_\Sigma T \Sigma )

\;=\;

\left(

J^\infty_\Sigma( E \times_\Sigma (\mathcal{G}[1]) )

,

s_{BRST} )

\right)

$$

whose Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra is the *local BRST complex* of the field theory with shifted infinitesimal vertical cotangent bundle

$$ \label{BVBRSTGradedFieldBundle} E_{\text{BV-BRST}} \;:=\; T^\ast_{\Sigma,inf}[-1]\left( E \times_\Sigma (\mathcal{G}[1]) \right) $$ | (185) |

of its underlying graded bundle from def. 11.14.

Then on the horizontal ##p+1##-forms on this bundle (def. 4.11) which in terms of the volume form may all be decomposed as (42)

$$

H

\;=\;

h \, dvol_\Sigma

\;\in\;

\Omega^{p+1}_\Sigma\left( \,T^\ast_{\Sigma,inf}[-1]\left( E \times_\Sigma (\mathcal{G}[1]) \right) \, \right)

$$

the *local antibrackets*

$$

\{-,-\}’

,

\{-,-\}

\;\colon\;

\Omega^{p+1,0}_\Sigma( \, T^\ast_{\Sigma,inf}[-1](E \times_\Sigma \mathcal{G}[1]) \, )

\,\otimes\,

\Omega^{p+1,0}_\Sigma( \, T^\ast_{\Sigma,inf}[-1](E \times_\Sigma \mathcal{G}[1]) \, )

\longrightarrow

\Omega^{p+1,0}_\Sigma( \, T^\ast_{\Sigma,inf}[-1](E \times_\Sigma \mathcal{G}[1]) \, )

$$

are the functions which are given in the local coordinates (184) as follows:

The first version is

$$

\begin{aligned}

\left\{ f\, dvol_\Sigma \,,\,g \, dvol_\Sigma \right\}’

& :=

\phantom{+}

\left(

\frac{\overset{\leftarrow}{\delta}_{EL} f }{\delta \phi^\ddagger_a}

\frac{\overset{\rightarrow}{\delta}_{EL} g}{\delta {\phi^a}^{\phantom{\ddagger}}}

–

\frac{\overset{\leftarrow}{\delta}_{EL}}{\delta {\phi^a}^{\phantom{\ddagger}}}

\frac{\overset{\rightarrow}{\delta}_{EL} g}{\delta \phi^\ddagger_a}

\right)

dvol_\Sigma

\\

&

\phantom{=} +

\left(

\frac{\overset{\leftarrow}{\delta}_{EL} f}{\delta c^\ddagger_\alpha}

\frac{\overset{\rightarrow}{\delta}_{EL} g}{\delta {c^\alpha}^{\phantom{\ddagger}}}

–

\frac{\overset{\leftarrow}{\delta}_{EL}}{\delta {c^\alpha}^{\phantom{\ddagger}}}

\frac{\overset{\rightarrow}{\delta}_{EL} g}{\delta c^\ddagger_\alpha}

\right)

dvol_\Sigma

\,.

\end{aligned}

$$

This is of the form of the Schouten bracket (182) but with Euler-Lagrange derivatives (48) instead of partial derivatives,

The second version is this:

$$ \label{LocalCommutatorOfDerivationsOnJetBundle} \begin{aligned} \left\{ f \, dvol_\Sigma, g \, dvol_\Sigma \right\} & := \phantom{+} \left( \left( \frac{d^k}{d x^{\mu_1} \cdots d x^{\mu_k}} \left( \frac{\overset{\leftarrow}{\delta}_{EL} f}{\delta \phi^a} \right) \right) \left( \frac{\overset{\rightarrow}{\partial} g}{\partial {\phi}^\ddagger_{a,\mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}} \right) – \left( \frac{d^k}{d x^{\mu_1} \cdots d x^{\mu_k}} \left( \frac{\overset{\leftarrow}{\delta}_{EL} f}{\delta \phi^\ddagger_a} \right) \right) \left( \frac{\overset{\rightarrow}{\partial} g}{\partial \phi^a_{,\mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}} \right) \right) \, dvol_\Sigma \\ & \phantom{:=} + \left( \left( \frac{d^k}{d x^{\mu_1} \cdots d x^{\mu_k}} \left( \frac{\overset{\leftarrow}{\delta}_{EL} f}{\delta c^\alpha} \right) \right) \left( \frac{\overset{\rightarrow}{\partial} g}{\partial {c}^\ddagger_{\alpha,\mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}} \right) – \left( \frac{d^k}{d x^{\mu_1} \cdots d x^{\mu_k}} \left( \frac{\overset{\leftarrow}{\delta}_{EL} f}{\delta c^\ddagger_\alpha} \right) \right) \left( \frac{\overset{\rightarrow}{\partial} g}{\partial c^\alpha_{,\mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}} \right) \right) \, dvol_\Sigma \end{aligned} $$ | (186) |

where again ##\frac{\delta_{EL}}{\delta \phi^a}## denotes the Euler-Lagrange variational derivative (48)

(Barnich-Henneaux 96 (2.9) and (2.12), reviewed in Barnich 10 (4.9))

###### Proposition 11.16. **(basic properties of the local antibracket)**

The local antibracket from def. 11.15 satisfies the following properties:

- The two versions differ by a total spacetime derivative (def. 4.11):$$

\{f,g\}

=

\{f,g\}’ + d(…)

\,.

$$ - The primed version is strictly graded skew-symmetric:$$

\left\{f \, dvol_\Sigma \,,\, g\, dvol_\Sigma \right\}’

\;=\;

– (-1)^{deg(f) deg(g)} \, \left\{g \, dvol_\Sigma \,,\, f\, dvol_\Sigma \right\}

$$ - The unprimed version ##\{-,-\}## strictly satisfies the graded Jacobi identity; in that, it is a graded derivation in the second argument, of degree one more than the degree of the first argument:
$$

\label{LocalAntibracketGradedDerivationInSecondArgument}

\left\{ f\, dvol_\Sigma, \left\{ g\, dvol_\Sigma \,,\, h\, dvol_\Sigma \right\}\right\}

\;=\;

\underset{

=

\left\{

\left\{ f\, dvol_\Sigma \,,\, g\, dvol_\Sigma \right\}’

\,,

h\, dvol_\Sigma

\right\}

}{

\underbrace{

\left\{

\left\{

f\, dvol_\Sigma

\,,\,

g\, dvol_\Sigma

\right\}

\,,\,

h\, dvol_\Sigma

\right\}

}

}

\;+\;

(-1)^{(deg(f)+1) deg(g)}

\left\{

g\, dvol_\Sigma

\,,\,

\left\{

f\, dvol_\Sigma

\,,\,

h\, dvol_\Sigma

\right\}

\right\}

$$(187) and the first term on the right is equivalently given by the primed bracket, as shown under the brace;

- the horizontally exact horizontal differential forms are an ideal for either bracket, in that for ##f dvol_\Sigma = d(\cdots)## or ##g dvol_\Sigma = d(\cdots)## we have$$

\{ f dvol_\Sigma, g \, dvol_\Sigma \}’ = 0

\phantom{AAA}

\{ f dvol_\Sigma, g \, dvol_\Sigma \} = d(\cdots)

$$

for all ##f##, ##g## of homogeneous degree ##deg(f)## and ##deg(g)##, respectively.

(Barnich-Henneaux 96 (B.6) and footnote 9).

**Proof.** That the two expressions differ by a horizontally exact term follows by the very definition of the Euler-Lagrange derivative (48). Also, the graded skew symmetry of the primed bracket is manifest.

The third point requires some computation (Barnich-Henneaux 96 (B.9)).

Finally that ##\{-,-\}’## vanishes when at least one of its arguments is horizontally exact follows from the fact that already the Euler-Lagrange derivative vanishes on this argument (example 5.22). This implies that ##\{-,-\}## is horizontally exact when at least one of its arguments is so, by the first item.

The following is the local refinement of prop. 11.13:

###### Remark 11.17. **(local classical master equation)**

The third item in prop. 11.16 implies that the following conditions on a Lagrangian density ##\mathbf{K} \in \Omega^{p+1}_\Sigma( T^\ast_{\Sigma,inf}( E \times_\Sigma \mathcal{G}[1] ) )## whose degree is even

$$

\mathbf{K} = K\, dvol_\Sigma

\,,

\phantom{AAA}

deg(L) \in 2 \mathbb{Z}

$$

are equivalent:

- forming the local antibracket (def. 11.15) with ##\mathbf{K}## is a differential$$

\left(\left\{ \mathbf{K},-\right\}\right)^2 = 0

\,,

$$ - the local antibracket (def. 11.15) of ##\mathbf{K}## with itself is a total spacetime derivative:$$

\left\{ \mathbf{K}, \mathbf{K}\right\} = d(…)

$$ - the other variant of the local antibracket (def. 11.15) of ##\mathbf{K}## with itself is a total spacetime derivative:$$

\left\{ \mathbf{K}, \mathbf{K}\right\}’ = d(…)

$$

This condition is also called the *local classical master equation*.

**derived critical locus on jet bundle — the local BV-BRST complex**

With the local version of the antibracket in hand (def. 11.15) it is now straightforward to refine the construction of a derived critical locus inside an action Lie algebroid (example 11.7) to the “derived” shell (49) inside the formal dual of the local BRST complex (example 10.28). The result is a derived Lie algebroid whose Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra is called the *local BV-BRST complex*. This is example 11.21 below.

The following definition 11.18 is the local refinement of def. 11.3:

###### Definition 11.18. **(local infinitesimal cotangent Lie algebroid)**

Let ##(E,\mathbf{L})## be a Lagrangian field theory (def. 5.1) over some spacetime ##\Sigma##, and let ##\mathcal{G} \overset{gb}{\to} \Sigma## be a bundle of gauge parameters (def. 10.6) which are closed (def. 10.26), inducing via example 10.28 the Lie algebroid

$$

E / ( \mathcal{G} \times_\Sigma T \Sigma )

\;=\;

\left(

J^\infty_\Sigma( E \times_\Sigma (\mathcal{G}[1]) )

,

s_{BRST} )

\right)

$$

whose Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra is the *local BRST complex* of the field theory.

Consider the case that both the field bundle ##E \overset{fb}{\to} \Sigma## (def. 3.1) as well as the gauge parameter bundle ##\mathcal{G} \overset{gb}{\to} \Sigma## are trivial vector bundles (example 3.4) over Minkowski spacetime ##\Sigma## (def. 2.17) with field coordinates ##(\phi^a)## and gauge parameter coordinates ##(c^\alpha)##.

Then the vertical infinitesimal cotangent Lie algebroid (def. 11.3) has coordinates as in (176) as well as all the corresponding jets and including also the horizontal differentials:

$$

\array{

&

\left(

c^\ddagger_{\alpha,\mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

\right)

&

\left(

\phi^a_{,\mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

\right)

,

\left(

\phi^\ddagger_{a,\mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

\right)

&

\left(

c^\alpha_{,\mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

\right),

\left(

d x^\mu

\right)

\\

deg =

&

-1

&

0

&

+1

}

\,.

$$

In terms of these coordinates BRST differential ##s_{BRST}##, thought of as a prolonged evolutionary vector field on ##E \times_\Sigma \mathcal{G}##, corresponds to the smooth function on the shifted cotangent bundle given by

$$ \label{BRSTFunctionForClosed} L_{BRST} \;=\; \left( \underset{k \in \mathbb{N}}{\sum} c^\alpha_{,\mu_1 \cdots \mu_k} R_\alpha^{a \mu_1 \cdots \mu_k} \right) \phi^\ddagger_a \;+\; \tfrac{1}{2} \gamma^\alpha{}_{\beta \gamma} c^\beta c^\gamma c^\ddagger_\alpha \;\in\; C^\infty\left( T^\ast_{\Sigma,inf}( E \times_\Sigma \mathcal{G}[1] ) \right) \,, $$ | (188) |

to be called the *BRST Lagrangian function* and the product with the spacetime volume form

$$

L_{BRST} \, dvol_\Sigma

\;\in\;

\Omega^{p+1,0}_\Sigma(E \times_\Sigma \mathcal{G}[1])

$$

as the *BRST Lagrangian density*.

We now define the Chevalley-Eilenberg differential on smooth functions on ##T^\ast_{inf}( E/(\mathcal{G} \times_\Sigma T \Sigma) )## to be given by the local antibracket ##\{-,-\}## (186) with the BRST Lagrangian density (188)

$$

d_{CE(T^\ast_{\Sigma,inf}( E/(\mathcal{G} \times_\Sigma T \Sigma) ))}

\;:=\;

\left\{

L_{BRST} dvol_\Sigma, –

\right\}

$$

This defines an ##L_\infty##-algebroid to be denoted

$$

T^\ast_{\Sigma,inf}( E/(\mathcal{G} \times_\Sigma T \Sigma) )

\,.

$$

The local refinement of prop. 11.5 is now this:

###### Proposition 11.19. **(Euler-Lagrange form is section of the local cotangent bundle of jet bundle gauge-action Lie algebroid)**

Let ##(E,\mathbf{L})## be a Lagrangian field theory (def. 5.1) over some spacetime ##\Sigma##, and let ##\mathcal{G} \overset{gb}{\to} \Sigma## be a gauge parameter bundle (def. 10.5) which are closed (def. 10.26), inducing via example 10.28 the Lie algebroid ##E / ( \mathcal{G} \times_\Sigma T \Sigma )## and via def. 11.18 its local cotangent Lie ∞-algebroid ##T^\ast_{inf}_\Sigma(E / ( \mathcal{G} \times_\Sigma T \Sigma ))##.

Then the Euler-Lagrange variational derivative (prop. 5.12) constitutes a section of the local cotangent Lie ∞-algebroid (def. 11.18)

$$

\array{

&& T^\ast_{\Sigma,inf}\left( E/(\mathcal{G} \times_\Sigma T \Sigma) \right)

\\

& {}^{\llap{ \delta_{EL} \mathbf{L} }}\nearrow & \downarrow^{\rlap{cb}}

\\

E/(\mathcal{G} \times_\Sigma T \Sigma)

&=&

E/(\mathcal{G} \times_\Sigma T \Sigma)

}

$$

given dually

$$

CE(E/(\mathcal{G} \times_\Sigma T\Sigma))

\overset{(\delta_{EL}\mathbf{L})^\ast}{\longleftarrow}

CE(T^\ast_{inf}(E/(\mathcal{G}\times_\Sigma T \Sigma)))

$$

by

$$

\array{

\left\{

\phi^a_{,\mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

\right\}

&\longleftarrow&

\left\{

\phi^a_{,\mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

\right\}

\\

\left\{

c^\alpha_{,\mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

\right\}

&\longleftarrow&

\left\{

c^\alpha_{,\mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

\right\}

\\

\left\{

\frac{d^k}{ d x^{\mu_1} \cdots d x^{\mu_k}}

\left(

\frac{\delta_{EL} L}{\delta \phi^a}

\right)

\right\}

&\longleftarrow&

\left\{

\phi^\ddagger_{a,\mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

\right\}

\\

\left\{

0

\right\}

&\longleftarrow&

\left\{

c^\ddagger_{\alpha,\mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

\right\}

}

$$

**Proof.** The proof of this proposition is a special case of the observation that the differentials involved are part of the local BV-BRST differential; this will be a direct consequence of the proof of prop. 11.21 below.

The local analog of def. 11.6 is now the following definition 11.20 of the “derived prolonged shell” of the theory (recall the ordinary prolonged shell ##\mathcal{E}^\infty \hookrightarrow J^\infty_\Sigma(E)## from (50)):

###### Definition 11.20. **(derived reduced prolonged shell)**

Let ##(E,\mathbf{L})## be a Lagrangian field theory (def. 5.1) over some spacetime ##\Sigma##, and let ##\mathcal{G} \overset{gb}{\to} \Sigma## be a bundle of closed irreducible gauge parameters (def. 10.6), inducing via prop. 11.19

a section ##\delta_{EL} L## of the local cotangent Lie algebroid of the jet bundle gauge-action Lie algebroid.

Then the *derived prolonged shell* ##(E/( \mathcal{G} \times_\Sigma T \Sigma ))_{\delta_{EL}L \simeq 0}## is the derived critical locus of ##\delta_{EL} L##, hence the homotopy pullback of ##\delta_{EL} L## along the zero section of the local cotangent Lie ##\infty##-algebroid:

$$

\array{

(E/( \mathcal{G} \times_\Sigma T \Sigma ))_{\delta_{EL}L \simeq 0}

&\longrightarrow&

E/( \mathcal{G} \times_\Sigma T \Sigma )

\\

\downarrow

&(pb)&

\downarrow^{\rlap{0}}

\\

E/(\mathcal{G} \times_\Sigma T \Sigma)

&\underset{\delta_{EL} L}{\longrightarrow}&

T^\ast_{\Sigma,inf}

\left(

E/( \mathcal{G} \times_\Sigma T \Sigma )

\right)

}

$$

As before, for the purpose of our running examples, the reader may take the following example as the definition of the derived reduced prolonged shell (def. 11.20). This is a local refinement of example 11.7:

###### Example 11.21. **(local BV-BRST complex)**

Let ##(E,\mathbf{L})## be a Lagrangian field theory (def. 5.1) over Minkowski spacetime ##\Sigma##, and let ##\mathcal{G} \overset{gb}{\to} \Sigma## be a gauge parameter bundle (def. 10.6) which is closed (def. 10.26). Assume that both are trivial vector bundles (example 3.4) with field coordinates as in prop. 11.19.

Then the Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra of the derived prolonged shell ##(E/( \mathcal{G} \times_\Sigma T \Sigma ))_{\delta_{EL}L \simeq 0}## (def. 11.20) is

$$

CE\left(

(E/( \mathcal{G} \times_\Sigma T \Sigma ))_{\delta_{EL}L \simeq 0}

\right)

\;=\;

\left(

C^\infty\left(

T^\ast_{\Sigma,inf}( E \times_\Sigma \mathcal{G}[1] \times_\Sigma T^\ast \Sigma[1] )

\right)

\,,\,

\underset{

= s

}{

\underbrace{

\left\{

\left(- L + L_{BRST}\right) dvol_\Sigma

\,,

(-)

\right\}

}

}

\;+\;

d

\right)

$$

where the underlying graded algebra is the algebra of functions on the (-1)-shifted vertical cotangent bundle of the fiber product of the field bundle with the (+1)-shifted gauge parameter bundle (as in example 11.7) and the shifted cotangent bundle of ##\Sigma##, and where the Chevalley-Eilenberg differential is the sum of the horizontal derivative ##d## with the *BV-BRST differential*

$$ \label{LocalAntibracketVersionOfBVBRSTDifferential} s \;:=\; \left\{ \left(- L + L_{BRST}\right) dvol_\Sigma \,, (-) \right\} $$ | (189) |

which is the local antibracket (def. 11.15) with the *BV-BRST Lagrangian density*

$$

\left( -L + L_{BRST}\right)

\;\in\;

\Omega^{p+1,0}_\Sigma\left( T^\ast_{\Sigma,inf}[-1]\left( E \times_\Sigma \mathcal{G}[1] \right)\right)

$$

which itself is the sum of (minus) the given Lagrangian density (def. 5.1) with the BRST Lagrangian (188).

The action of the BV-BRST differential on the generators is as follows:

$$

\array{

& & \array{ \text{BV-BRST differential} \\ s } &

\\

\text{field}

&

\phi^a

&\mapsto&

\underset{ = s_{BRST}(\phi^a) }{

\underbrace{

\left(

\underset{k \in \mathbb{N}}{\sum} c^\alpha_{,\mu_1 \cdots \mu_k} R_\alpha^{a \mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

\right)

}

}

&

\text{gauge symmetry}

\\

\text{

ghost field

}

&

c^\alpha

&\mapsto&

\underset{ = s_{BRST}(c^\alpha) }{

\underbrace{

\tfrac{1}{2}\gamma^\alpha{}_{\beta \gamma} c^\beta c^\gamma

}

}

&

\text{Lie bracket}

\\

\text{antifield}

&

\phi^\ddagger_\alpha

&\mapsto&

\phantom{-}

\underset{ = s_{BV}(\phi^\ddagger_a) }{

\underbrace{

\frac{\delta_{EL} L}{\delta \phi^a}

}}

&

\text{equations of motion}

\\

&&&

\underset{ = s_{BRST}(\phi^\ddagger_a) }{

\underbrace{

–

\left(

\underset{k \in \mathbb{N}}{\sum}

\frac{\delta_{EL}}{\delta \phi^a}

\left(

c^\alpha_{,\mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

R_\alpha^{b \mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

\phi^\ddagger_b

\right)

\right)

}

}

&

\\

\array{

\text{antifield of}

\\

\text{ghost field}

}

&

c^\ddagger_\alpha

&\mapsto&

\underset{ = s_{BV}(c^\ddagger_\alpha) }{

\underbrace{

–

\underset{k \in \mathbb{N}}{\sum}

(-1)^k \frac{d^k}{d x^{\mu_1} \cdots d x^{\mu_k}}

\left(

R_\alpha^{a \mu_1 \cdots \mu_k} \phi^\ddagger_a

\right)

}

}

&

\text{Noether identities}

\\

&&& +

\underset{ = s_{BRST}(c^\ddagger_\alpha) }{

\underbrace{

\gamma^{\alpha’}{}_{ \alpha \beta} c^\beta c^\ddagger_{\alpha’}

}

}

}

$$

and this extends to jets of generator by ##s \circ d + d \circ s = 0##.

This is called the *local BV-BRST complex*.

By introducing a bigrading as in prop. 11.9

$$

\array{

&

\left(

c^\ddagger_{\alpha, \mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

\right)

&

\left(

\phi^\ddagger_{a, \mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

\right)

&

\left(

\phi^a_{,\mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

\right)

&

\left(

c^\alpha_{,\mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

\right)

\\

deg_{gh} =

&

0

&

0

&

0

&

+1

\\

deg_{af} =

&

-2

&

-1

&

0

&

0

}

$$

this splits into the total complex of a bicomplex with

$$

s \;=\; s_{BV} + s_{BRST}

$$

with

$$

\array{

& s_{BRST} & s_{BV}

\\

deg_{gh} = & +1 & 0

\\

deg_{af} = & 0 & +1

}

$$

as shown in the above table. Under this decomposition, the *classical master equation*

$$

s^2 = 0

\phantom{AAAA}

\Leftrightarrow

\phantom{AAAA}

\left\{ \left( -L + L_{BRST}\right) dvol_\Sigma \,,\, \left( -L + L_{BRST}\right) dvol_\Sigma \right\} = 0

$$

is equivalent to three conditions:

$$

\array{

\left( s_{BV} \right)^2 = 0 && \text{Noether’s second theorem}

\\

\left( s_{BRST} \right)^2 = 0 && \text{closure of gauge symmetry}

\\

\left[ s_{BV}, s_{BRST} \right] = 0 &&

\left\{

\array{

\text{ gauge symmetry preserves the shell },

\\

\text{ gauge symmetry acts on Noether identities }

}

\right.

}

$$

(e.q. Barnich 10 (4.10))

**Proof.** Due to the construction in def. 11.20 the BRST differential by itself is already assumed to square to the

$$

\left(s_{BRST}\right)^2 = 0

$$

The remaining conditions we may check on 0-jet generators.

The condition

$$

\left( s_{BV} \right)^2 = 0

$$

is non-trivial only on the antifields of the ghost fields. Here we obtain

$$

\begin{aligned}

s_{BV} s_{BV} c^\ddagger_\alpha

& =

-\underset{k \in \mathbb{N}}{\sum}

(-1)^k \frac{d^k}{d x^{\mu_1} \cdots d x^{\mu_k}}

\left(

R_\alpha^{a \mu_1 \cdots \mu_k} \phi^\ddagger_a

\right)

\\

& =

-\underset{k \in \mathbb{N}}{\sum}

(-1)^k \frac{d^k}{d x^{\mu_1} \cdots d x^{\mu_k}}

\left(

R_\alpha^{a \mu_1 \cdots \mu_k} \frac{\delta_{EL} L}{\delta \phi^a}

\right)

\end{aligned}

$$

That this vanishes is the statement of Noether’s second theorem (prop. 10.9).

Next we check

$$

s_{BV} \circ s_{BRST} + s_{BRST} \circ s_{BV}

=

0

$$

on generators. On the fields ##\phi^a## and the ghost fields ##c^\alpha## this is trivial (both summands vanish separately). On the antifields we get on the one hand

$$

\begin{aligned}

s_{BRST} s_{BV} \phi^{\ddagger}_a

& =

s_{BRST} \frac{\delta_{EL} L}{\delta \phi^a}

\\

& =

\underset{k}{\sum}

\underset{q}{\sum}

\frac{d^q}{d x^{\nu_1} \cdots d x^{\nu_q}}

\left(

c^\alpha_{,\mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

R_\alpha^{b \mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

\right)

\frac{\partial}{\partial \phi^b_{,\nu_1 \cdots \nu_q}}

\frac{\delta_{EL} L}{\delta \phi^a}

\end{aligned}

$$

and on the other hand

$$

\begin{aligned}

s_{BV} s_{BRST} \phi^\ddagger_a

& =

–

s_{BV}

\underset{k}{\sum}

\frac{\delta_{EL}}{\delta \phi^a}

\left(

c^\alpha_{,\mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

R_\alpha^{b \mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

\phi^\ddagger_b

\right)

\\

& =

+

\underset{k}{\sum}

\underset{q}{\sum}

(-1)^q

\frac{d^q}{d x^{\nu_1} \cdots d x^{\nu_q}}

\left(

\frac{\partial}{\partial \phi^a_{,\mu_1 \cdots \mu_q}}

\left(

c^\alpha_{,\mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

R_\alpha^{b \mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

\right)

\frac{\delta_{EL} L}{\delta \phi^b}

\right)

\end{aligned}

$$

That the sum of these two terms indeed vanishes is equation (80) in the proof of the on-shell invariance of the equations of motion under infinitesimal symmetries of the Lagrangian (prop. 6.16)

Finally, on antifields of ghostfields we get

$$

\begin{aligned}

s_{BV} s_{BRST} c^\ddagger_\alpha

& =

s_{BV} \gamma^{\alpha’}{}_{\alpha \beta} c^\beta c^\ddagger_{\alpha’}

\\

& =

–

\gamma^{\alpha’}{}_{\alpha \beta} c^\beta

\underset{k \in \mathbb{N}}{\sum}

(-1)^k \frac{d^k}{d x^{\mu_1} \cdots d x^{\mu_k}}

\left(

R_{\alpha’}^{a \mu_1 \cdots \mu_k} \phi^\ddagger_a

\right)

\end{aligned}

$$

as well as

$$

\begin{aligned}

s_{BRST} s_{BV} c^\ddagger_\alpha

& =

s_{BRST}

\left(

\underset{k \in \mathbb{N}}{\sum}

(-1)^k \frac{d^k}{d x^{\mu_1} \cdots d x^{\mu_k}}

\left(

R_\alpha^{a \mu_1 \cdots \mu_k} \phi^\ddagger_a

\right)

\right)

\\

& =

R

\left(

\underset{k \in \mathbb{N}}{\sum}

(-1)^k \frac{d^k}{d x^{\mu_1} \cdots d x^{\mu_k}}

\left(

R_\alpha^{a \mu_1 \cdots \mu_k} \phi^\ddagger_a

\right)

\right)

\;-\;

\left(

\underset{k \in \mathbb{N}}{\sum}

(-1)^k \frac{d^k}{d x^{\mu_1} \cdots d x^{\mu_k}}

\left(

R_\alpha^{a \mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

\left(

\underset{q \in \mathbb{N}}{\sum}

\frac{\delta_{EL}}{\delta \phi^a}

\left(

c^{\alpha’}_{,\nu_1 \cdots \nu_q}

R_{\alpha’}^{b \nu_1 \cdots \nu_q}

\phi^\ddagger_b

\right)

\right)

\right)

\right)

\\

& +

R

\left(

\underset{k \in \mathbb{N}}{\sum}

(-1)^k \frac{d^k}{d x^{\mu_1} \cdots d x^{\mu_k}}

\left(

R_\alpha^{a \mu_1 \cdots \mu_k} \phi^\ddagger_a

\right)

\right)

\;-\;

\left(

\underset{k \in \mathbb{N}}{\sum}

(-1)^k \frac{d^k}{d x^{\mu_1} \cdots d x^{\mu_k}}

\left(

R_\alpha^{a \mu_1 \cdots \mu_k}

\left(

\underset{q,r \in \mathbb{N}}{\sum}

(-1)^{r}

\frac{d^r}{d x^{\rho_1} \cdots d x^{\rho_r}}

\left(

c^{\alpha’}_{,\nu_1 \cdots \nu_q}

\frac{\partial R_{\alpha’}^{b \nu_1 \cdots \nu_q}}{\partial \phi^a_{,\rho_1 \cdots \rho_r}}

\phi^\ddagger_b

\right)

\right)

\right)

\right)

\\

& = (R \cdot N_R)_a^b (\phi^\ddagger_b)

\end{aligned}

$$

where in the last line we identified the Lie algebra action of infinitesimal symmetries of the Lagrangian on Noether operators from def. 10.12. Under this identification, the fact that

$$

\left(

s_{BRST}s_{BV}

+

s_{BV} s_{BRST}

\right)

c^\ddagger_\alpha

=

0

$$

is a relation (158) in prop. 10.13.

###### Example 11.22. **(derived prolonged shell in the absence of explicit gauge symmetry — the local BV-complex)**

Let ##(E,\mathbf{L})## be a Lagrangian field theory (def. rrreeefff LocalLagrangianDensityOnSecondOrde rJetBundleOfTrivialVectorBundleOverMinkowskiSpacetime from 11 ) with vanishing gauge parameter bundle (def. 10.5) (possibly because there are no non-trivial infinitesimal gauge symmetries, such as for the scalar field, or because none were chose), hence with no ghost fields introduced. Then the local derived critical locus of its Lagrangian density (def. 11.20) is the plain local BV-complex of def. 7.43.

$$

s = s_{BV}

\,.

$$

###### Example 11.23. **(local BV-BRST complex of vacuum electromagnetism on Minkowski spacetime)**

Consider the Lagrangian field theory of free electromagnetism on Minkowski spacetime (example 5.6) with gauge parameter as in example 10.14. With the field and gauge parameter coordinates as chosen in these examples

$$

\left(

(a_\mu), c

\right)

$$

then the local BV-BRST complex (prop. 11.21) has generators

$$

\array{

& c^\ddagger & (a^\ddagger)^\mu & a_\mu & c

\\

deg =

&

-2 & -1 & 0 & 1

}

$$

together with their total spacetime derivatives, and the local BV-BRST differential ##s## acts on these generators as follows:

$$

s

\;\colon\;

\left\{

\array{

(a^\dagger)^\mu &\mapsto& f^{\nu \mu}_{,\nu} & \text{(equations of Motion — vacuum Maxwell equations)}

\\

c^\ddagger &\mapsto& (a^\ddagger)^\mu_{,\mu} & \text{(Noether identity)}

\\

a_\mu &\mapsto& c_{,\mu} & \text{(infinitesimal gauge transformation)}

}

\right.

$$

More generally:

###### Example 11.24. **(local BV-BRST complex of Yang-Mills theory)**

For ##\mathfrak{g}## a semisimple Lie algebra, consider ##\mathfrak{g}##-Yang-Mills theory on Minkowski spacetime from example 5.7, with local BRST complex as in example 10.31, hence with BRST Lagrangian (188) given by

$$

L_{BRST}

=

\left(

c^\alpha_{,\mu}

–

\gamma^\alpha{}_{\beta \gamma}c^\beta a^\gamma_\mu

\right)

(a^\ddagger)_\alpha^\mu

\;+\;

\tfrac{1}{2}

\gamma^\alpha{}_{\beta \gamma} c^\beta c^\gamma c^\ddagger_\alpha

\,.

$$

Then its local BV-BRST complex (example 11.21) has BV-BRST differential ##s = \left\{ -L + L_{BRST} \,,\, – \right\}## given on 0-jets as follows:

$$

\array{

& & s &

\\

\text{field}

&

a_\mu^\alpha

&\mapsto&

c^\alpha_{,\mu}

–

\gamma^\alpha{}_{\beta \gamma}c^\beta a^\gamma_\mu

&

\text{gauge symmetry}

\\

\text{

ghost field

}

&

c^\alpha

&\mapsto&

\tfrac{1}{2}\gamma^\alpha{}_{\beta \gamma} c^\beta c^\gamma

&

\text{Lie bracket}

\\

\text{antifield}

&

(a^\ddagger)^\mu_\alpha

&\mapsto&

\phantom{-}

\left(

\frac{d}{d x^\mu} f^{\mu \nu \alpha’}

+

\gamma^{\alpha’}{}_{\beta’ \gamma} a_\mu^{\beta’} f^{\mu \nu \gamma}

\right)

k_{\alpha’ \alpha}

&

\text{equations of motion}

\\

&&&

–

\gamma^{\alpha’}{}_{\beta \alpha}c^\beta

(a^\ddagger)_{\alpha’}^\mu

&

\\

\text{anti ghostfield}

&

c^\ddagger_\alpha

&\mapsto&

\gamma^{\alpha’}{}_{\alpha \gamma} a^\gamma_\mu (a^\ddagger)^\mu_{\alpha’}

+ \frac{d}{d x^\mu} (a^\ddagger)^\mu_\alpha

&

\text{Noether identities}

\\

&&& + \gamma^{\alpha’}{}_{ \alpha \beta} c^\beta c^\ddagger_{\alpha’}

}

$$

(e.g. Barnich-Brandt-Henneaux 00 (2.8))

So far the discussion yields just the algebra of functions on the derived reduced prolonged shell. We now discuss the derived analog of the full variational bicomplex (def. 4.11) to the derived reduced shell.

**(derived variational bicomplex)**

The analog of the de Rham complex of a derived Lie algebroid is called the *Weil algebra*:

###### Definition 11.25. **(Weil algebra of a Lie algebroid)**

Given a derived Lie algebroid ##\mathfrak{a}## over some ##X## (def. 10.22), its Weil algebra is

$$

W(\mathfrak{a})

\;:=\;

\left(

Sym_{C^\infty(X)}( \Gamma(T^\ast_{inf} X) \oplus \mathfrak{a}_\bullet \oplus \mathfrak{a}[1]_\bullet )

\;,\;

\mathbf{d}_W := \mathbf{d} + d_{CE}

\right)

\,,

$$

where ##\mathbf{d}## acts as the de Rham differential ##\mathbf{d} \colon C^\infty(X) \to \Gamma(T^\ast_{inf} X)## on functions, and as the degree shift operator ##\mathbf{d} \colon \mathfrak{a}_\bullet \to \mathfrak{a}[1]_\bullet## on the graded elements.

smooth manifolds | derived Lie algebroids |

algebra of functions | Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra |

algebra of differential forms | Weil algebra |

###### Example 11.26. **(classical Weil algebra)**

Let ##\mathfrak{g}## be a Lie algebra with corresponding Lie algebroid ##B \mathfrak{g}## (example 10.24). Then the Weil algebra (def. 11.25) of ##B \mathfrak{g}## is the traditional Weil algebra of ##\mathfrak{g}## from classical Lie theory.

###### Definition 11.27. **(variational BV-bicomplex)**

Let ##(E,\mathbf{L})## be a Lagrangian field theory (def. 5.1) equipped with a gauge parameter bundle ##\mathcal{G}## (def. 10.6) which is closed (def. 10.26). Consider the Lie algebroid ##E/(\mathcal{G} \times_\Sigma T \Sigma)## from example 10.28, whose Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra is the local BRST complex of the theory.

Then its Weil algebra ##W(E/(\mathcal{G} \times_\Sigma T \Sigma))## (def. 11.25) has as differential the variational derivative (def. 4.11) plus the BRST differential

$$

\begin{aligned}

d_{W}

& = \mathbf{d} – (d – s_{BRST})

\\

& =

\delta + s_{BRST}

\end{aligned}

\,.

$$

Therefore we speak of the *variational BRST-bicomplex* and write

$$

\Omega^\bullet_\Sigma( E/(\mathcal{G} \times_\Sigma T \Sigma) )

\,.

$$

Similarly, the Weil algebra of the derived prolonged shell ##(E/( \mathcal{G} \times_\Sigma T \Sigma ))_{\delta_{EL}L \simeq 0}## (def. 11.20) has differential

$$

\begin{aligned}

d_W

& = \mathbf{d} – (d – s)

\\

& = \delta + s

\end{aligned}

\,.

$$

Since ##s## is the BV-BRST differential (prop. 11.21) this defines the “BV-BRST variational bicomplex”.

**global BV-BRST complex**

Finally we may apply transgression of variational differential forms to turn the local BV-BRST complex on smooth functions on the jet bundle into a global BV-BRST complex on graded local observables on the graded space of field histories.

###### Definition 11.28. **(global BV-BRST complex)**

Let ##(E,\mathbf{L})## be a Lagrangian field theory (def. 5.1) equipped with a gauge parameter bundle ##\mathcal{G}## (def. 10.6) which is closed (def. 10.26). Then on the local observables (def. 7.38) on the space of field histories (def. 3.1) of the graded field bundle

$$

E_{\text{BV-BRST}}

=

T^\ast_{\Sigma,inf}[-1](E \times_\Sigma \mathcal{G}[1])

$$

underlying the local BV-BRST complex (185), consider the linear map

$$ \label{LocalAntibracketTransgressed} \array{ LocObs(E_{\text{BV-BRST}}) \otimes LocObs(E_{\text{BV-BRST}}) &\overset{\{-,-\}}{\longrightarrow}& LocObs(E_{\text{BV-BRST}}) \\ \tau_\Sigma(\alpha), \tau_\Sigma(\beta) &\mapsto& \tau_\Sigma( \{\alpha, \beta\} ) } $$ | (190) |

where ##\alpha, \beta \in \Omega^{p+1,0}_{\Sigma,cp}(E_{\text{BV-BRST}})## (def. 7.31), where ##\tau_\Sigma## denotes transgression of variational differential forms (def. 7.32), and where on the right ##\{-,-\}## is the local antibracket (def. 11.15).

This is well-defined, in that this formula indeed depends on the horizontal differential forms ##\alpha## and ##\beta## only through the local observables ##\tau_\Sigma(\alpha), \tau_\Sigma(\beta)## which they induce. The resulting bracket is called the (global) *antibracket*.

Indeed the formula makes sense already if at least one of ##\alpha, \beta## have compact spacetime support (def. 7.31), and hence the transgression of the BV-BRST differential (189) is a well-defined differential on the graded local observables

$$

\left\{

-\tau_\Sigma \mathbf{L}

+ \tau_\Sigma \mathbf{L}_{BRST}

\;,\, –

\right\}

\;\colon\;

LocObs(E_{\text{BV-BRST}})

\longrightarrow

LocObs(E_{\text{BV-BRST}})

\,,

$$

where by example 7.34 we may think of the first argument on the left as the BV-BRST action functional without adiabatic switching, which makes sense inside the antibracket when acting on functionals with compact spacetime support. Hence we may suggestively write

$$ \label{GlobalBVBRSTDifferential} \left\{ -S + S_{BRST} \;,\;- \right\} \;:=\; \left\{ -\tau_\Sigma \mathbf{L} + \tau_\Sigma \mathbf{L}_{BRST} \;,\, – \right\} $$ | (191) |

for this (global) *BV-BRST differential*.

This uniquely extends as a graded derivation to multilocal observables (def. 7.38) and from there along with the dense subspace inclusion (103)

$$

PolyMultiLocObs(E_{\text{BV-BRST}})

\overset{\text{dense}}{\hookrightarrow}

PolyObs(E_{\text{BV-BRST}})

$$

to a differential on off-shell polynomial observables (def. 7.13):

$$

\{-S’ + S’_{BRST}\}

\;\colon\;

PolyObs(E_{\text{BV-BRST}})

\longrightarrow

PolyObs(E_{\text{BV-BRST}})

$$

This differential graded-commutative superalgebra

$$ \label{GlobalBVComplexdgAlgebra} \left( \left( \underset{ \text{vector space} }{ \underbrace{ PolyObs(E_{\text{BV-BRST}}) }} , \underset{ \text{product} }{ \underbrace{ (-)\cdot(-) }} \right) , \underset{ \text{differential} }{ \underbrace{ \{-S’ + S’_{BRST}, -\} }} \right) $$ | (192) |

is the *global BV-BRST complex* of the given Lagrangian field theory with the chosen gauge parameters.

**Proof.** We need to check that the global antibracket (190) is well defined:

By the last item of prop. 11.16 the horizontally exact horizontal differential forms form a “Lie ideal” for the local antibracket. With this, the proof that the transgressed bracket is well defined is the same as the proof that the global Poisson bracket on the Hamiltonian local observables is well defined, def. 8.14.

###### Example 11.29. **(global BV-differential in components)**

In the situation of def. 11.28, assume that the field bundles of all fields, ghost fields and auxiliary fields are trivial vector bundles, with field/ghost-field/auxiliary-field coordinates on their fiber product bundle collectively denoted ##(\phi^A)##.

Then the first summand of the global BV-BRST differential (def. 11.28) is given by

$$ \label{ComponentsOfGlobalBVDifferential} \begin{aligned} \left\{ -S’, -\right\} & = \int_\Sigma j^{\infty}\left(\mathbf{\Phi}\right)^\ast \left( \frac{\overset{\leftarrow}{\delta}_{EL} L}{\delta \phi^A} \right)(x) \frac{\delta}{\delta \mathbf{\Phi}^\ddagger_A(x)} \, dvol_\Sigma(x) \\ & = \underset{A}{\sum} (-1)^{deg(\phi^A)} \int_\Sigma (P_{A B}\mathbf{\Phi}^A)(x) \frac{\delta}{\delta \mathbf{\Phi}^\ddagger_A(x)} \, dvol_\Sigma(x) \end{aligned} $$ | (193) |

where

- ##P \;\colon\; \Gamma_\Sigma(E) \longrightarrow \Gamma_\Sigma(E^\ast)##is the differential operator (64) from def. 5.24, corresponding to the Euler-Lagrange equations of motion.
- ##deg(\phi^A) := n_{(\Phi^A)} + \sigma_{\Phi^A} \;\in\; \mathbb{Z}/2##is the sum of the cohomological degree and of the super-degree of ##\Phi^A## (as in def. 10.17, def. link ).

It follows that the cochain cohomology of the global BV-differential ##\{-S’,-\}## (192) in ##deg_{af} = 0## is the space of on-shell polynomial observables:

$$ \label{OnShellPolynomialObservablesAsBVCohomology} \underset{ \text{off-shell} }{ \underbrace{ PolyObs(E_{\text{BV-BRST}})_{def(af = 0)} }}/im(\{-S’,-\}) \;\simeq\; \underset{ \text{on-shell} }{ \underbrace{ PolyObs(E_{\text{BV-BRST}}, \mathbf{L}’) }} \,. $$ | (194) |

**Proof.** By definition, the part ##\mathbf{L}’## of the gauge fields Lagrangian density is independent of antifields, so that the local antibracket with ##\mathbf{L}’## reduces to

$$

\left\{ -\mathbf{L}’,-\right\}

\;=\;

\frac{\overset{\leftarrow}{\delta}_{EL} \mathbf{L}’}{\delta \phi^A}

\frac{\delta}{\delta \phi^{\ddagger}_A}

$$

With this the expression for ##\{-S’,-\}## follows directly from the definition of the global antibracket (def. 11.28) and the Euler-Lagrange equations (64)

$$

(P \Phi)_A = j^\infty_\Sigma(\Phi)\left( \frac{\delta_{EL} L}{\delta \phi^A} \right)

\,.

$$

where the sign ##(-1)^{deg(\phi^A)}## is the relative sign between ##\frac{\delta_{EL} L}{\delta \phi^A} = \frac{\overset{\rightarrow}{\delta}_{EL} L’}{\delta \phi^A}## and ##\frac{\overset{\leftarrow}{\delta}_{EL} L’}{\delta \phi^A}## (def. 11.11):

By the assumption that ##L’## defines a free field theory, ##\mathbf{L}’## is quadratic in the fields, so that from ##deg(\mathbf{L}) = 0## it follows that the derivations from the left and from the right differ by the relative sign

$$

\begin{aligned}

(-1)^{

\left(

n_{(\phi^A)} n_{(\phi^A)}

+

\sigma_{(\phi^A)} \sigma_{(\phi^A)}

\right)

}

& =

(-1)^{

\left(

n_{(\phi^A)} + \sigma_{(\phi^A)}

\right)

}

\\

& =

(-1)^{deg(\phi^A)}

\end{aligned}

\,.

$$

From this, the identification (194) follows by (99) in theorem 7.29.

This concludes our discussion of the reduced phase space of a Lagrangian field theory exhibited, dually by its local BV-BRST complex. In the next chapter we finally turn to the key implication of this construction: the gauge fixing of a Lagrangian gauge theory which makes the collection of fields and auxiliary fields (ghost fields and antifields) jointly have a (differential-graded) covariant phase space.

I am a researcher in the department Algebra, Geometry and Mathematical Physics of the Institute of Mathematics at the Czech Academy of the Sciences (CAS) in Prague.

Presently I am on leave at the Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in Bonn.

So ##partial_phi## has degree 0 because is "removes" elements of degree zero (field coordinates), while ##partial_c## has degree -1 because it "removes" elements of degree +1 (namely ghost field coordinates).Wow I really should have seen this. Thanks!

What is in principle the grading on ##Der(CE(mathfrak{a}))_bullet##, such that in the next example for the action Lie algebroid, ##frac{partial}{partial c^alpha}## and ##frac{partial}{partial phi^a}## have degree ##-1## and ##0## respectively?The degree of a derivation ##partial## on a graded algebra is the amount by which it raises (or lowers) the degree of the algebra elements that it acts on, hence the number ##deg(partial)## such that for ##a_1, a_2## two elements of homogeous degree in the graded algebra, we have

$$ partial (a_1 a_2) = (partial a_1) a_2 + (-1)^{deg(partial) deg(a_1)}, a_1 (partial a_2) $$

So ##partial_phi## has degree 0 because is "removes" elements of degree zero (field coordinates), while ##partial_c## has degree -1 because it "removes" elements of degree +1 (namely ghost field coordinates).

I am not sure I got why ## C^infty(X)/ (frac{partial S}{partial phi^a}) simeq C^infty(X_{dS=0}) ## when ##X## is a superpoint.The issue is that we want to invoke a theorem about Koszul resolutions (this one) which is proven in algebraic geometry. This does not generally carry over to differential geometry, where one needs to impose and then check subtle regularity conditions for the theorem still to apply. But in the synthetic differential super-geometry that we are using gives a partial unification of the worlds of algebraic and of differential geometry: Infinitesimal neighbourhoods in synthetic differential geometry follow the rules of algebraic geometry directly. So here to give a genuine proof (traditionally glossed over in the physics literature) that, after gauge fixing, the local BV-differential really does yield a resolution of the shell inside the jet bundle, we make use of the fact that we need this just for perturbative quantum field theory anyway, where the field histories really are just in the infinitesimal neighbourhood of a fixed on-shell field history (the one we are perturbing around). This allows us to invoke that theorem .

1. In defining the infinitesimal cotangent Lie algebroid, the underlying graded algebra is defined as

$$ (T^ast_{inf} mathfrak{a})^ast_bullet

;:=;

mathfrak{a}^ast_bullet oplus Der(CE(mathfrak{a}))_bullet $$

I understand this is a degree-by-degree direct sum. What is in principle the grading on ##Der(CE(mathfrak{a}))_bullet##, such that in the next example for the action Lie algebroid, ##frac{partial}{partial c^alpha}## and ##frac{partial}{partial phi^a}## have degree ##-1## and ##0## respectively?

2. I am not sure I got why ## C^infty(X)/ (frac{partial S}{partial phi^a}) simeq C^infty(X_{dS=0}) ## when ##X## is a superpoint.

My understanding of the given explanation is the following. As ##X## is a superpoint, each generator ##f## in ##C^infty(X) := mathbb{R} oplus V## where ##V## is a finite dimensional vector space that is a nilpotent ideal, and we could write ##f = f_0 + f_1a_1 + … + f_na_n## where ##f_i in mathbb{R}## and ##a_i## are the basis vectors of ##V##. Thus as long as ##f## vanishes where ##frac{partial S}{partial psi^a}## vanishes, we could generate ##f## from ##frac{partial S}{partial psi^a}## by scaling term by term. Such ##f## is zero in the quotient, and so the quotient is exactly the algebra of functions on ##X_{dS=0}##. But

(a) Is ##X## being a superpoint a necessary condition? If ##X## is an usual manifold, we could also do the scaling point by point.

(b) We are not actually allowed to talk about "points" in a superpoint. Are we, again, secretly using a 1-1 correspondence between ##{ Xrightarrow mathbb{R}^1 }## and ## {X_{even} rightarrow mathbb{R}^1 }## with ##C^infty(X_{even})## generated from generators of ##C^infty(X) ## regarded in even degree?

8 more to go, what a series!