# A First Idea of Quantum Field Theory – 20 Part Series

These notes mean to give an expository but rigorous introduction to the basic concepts of relativistic perturbative quantum field theories, specifically those that arise as the perturbative quantization of a *Lagrangian field theory* — such as quantum electrodynamics, quantum chromodynamics, and perturbative quantum gravity appearing in the standard model of particle physics.

For broad introduction of the idea of the topic of *perturbative quantum field theory* see there and see

- PhysicsForums-Insights:
*Introduction to Perturbative Quantum Field Theory*

Here, first we consider classical field theory (or rather pre-quantum field theory), complete with BV-BRST formalism; then its deformation quantization via causal perturbation theory to perturbative quantum field theory. This mathematically rigorous (i.e. clear and precise) formulation of the traditional informal lore has come to be known as *perturbative algebraic quantum field theory*.

We aim to give a *fully local* discussion, where all structures arise on the “jet bundle over the field bundle” (introduced below) and “transgress” from there to the spaces of field histories over spacetime (discussed further below). This “Higher Prequantum Geometry” streamlines traditional constructions and serves the conceptualization in the theory. This is joint work with Igor Khavkine.

In full beauty these concepts are extremely general and powerful; but the aim here is to give a first precise idea of the subject, not a fully general account. Therefore we concentrate on the special case where spacetime is Minkowski spacetime (def. 2.17 below), where the field bundle (def. 3.1 below) is an ordinary trivial vector bundle (example 3.4 below) and hence the Lagrangian density (def. 5.1 below) is globally defined. Similarly, when considering gauge theory we consider just the special case that the gauge parameter-bundle is a trivial vector bundle and we concentrate on the case that the gauge symmetries are “closed irreducible” (def. 10.6 below). But we aim to organize all concepts such that the *structure* of their generalization to curved spacetime and non-trivial field bundles is immediate.

This comparatively simple setup already subsumes what is considered in traditional texts on the subject; it captures the established perturbative BRST-BV quantization of gauge fields coupled to fermions on curved spacetimes — which is the state of the art. Further generalization, necessary for the discussion of global topological effects, such as instanton configurations of gauge fields, will be discussed elsewhere (see at *homotopical algebraic quantum field theory*).

Alongside the theory we develop the concrete examples of the real scalar field, the electromagnetic field and the Dirac field; eventually combining these to a disussion of quantum electrodynamics.

**running examples**

field | field bundle | Lagrangian density | equation of motion |

real scalar field | expl. 3.5 | expl. 5.4 | expl. 5.17 |

Dirac field | expl. 3.50 | expl. 5.9 | expl. 5.30 |

electromagnetic field | expl. 3.6 | expl. 5.6 | expl. 5.18 |

Yang-Mills field | expl. 3.7, expl. 3.8 |
expl. 5.7 | expl. 5.19 |

B-field | expl. 3.9 | expl 5.8 | expl. 5.20 |

field | Poisson bracket | causal propagator | Wightman propagator | Feynman propagator |

real scalar field | expl. 8.8, expl. 8.15 |
prop. 9.54 | def. 9.57 | def. 9.61 |

Dirac field | expl. 8.8, expl. 8.16 |
prop. 9.70 | def. 9.71 | def. 9.72 |

electromagnetic field | prop. 12.9 | prop. 12.9 |

field | gauge symmetry | local BRST complex | gauge fixing |

electromagnetic field | expl. 10.14 | expl. 10.30 | expl. 12.8 |

Yang-Mills field | expl. 10.15 | expl. 10.31 | … |

B-field | expl. 10.16 | expl. 10.32 | … |

interacting field theory | interaction Lagrangian density | interaction Wick algebra-element | |

phi^n theory | exp. 5.5 | expl. 14.13 | |

quantum electrodynamics | expl. 5.11 | expl. 14.14 |

**References**

Pointers to the literature are given in each chapter, alongside the text. The following are a few selections of references.

The discussion of spinors in chapter *2. Spacetime* follows Baez-Huerta 09.

The functorial geometry of supergeometric spaces of field histories in *3. Fields* follows Schreiber 13.

For the jet bundle-formulation of variational calculus of Lagrangian field theory in *4. Field variations*, and *5. Lagrangians* we follow Anderson 89 and Olver 86; for *6. Symmetries* augmented by Fiorenza-Rogers-Schreiber 13b.

The identification of polynomial observables with distributions in *7. Observables* was observed by Paugam 12.

The discussion of the Peierls-Poisson bracket in *8. Phase space* is based on Khavkine 14.

The derivation of wave front sets of propagators in *9. Propagators* takes clues from Radzikowski 96 and uses results from Gelfand-Shilov 66.

For the general idea of BV-BRST formalism a good review is Henneaux 90.

The Lie algebroid-perspective on BRST complexes developed in chapter *10. Gauge symmetries*, may be compared to Barnich 10.

For the local BV-BRST theory laid out in chapter *11. Reduced phase space* we are following Barnich-Brandt-Henneaux 00.

For the BV-gauge fixing developed in *12. Gauge fixing* we take clues from Fredenhagen-Rejzner 11a.

For the free quantum BV-operators in *13. Free quantum fields* and the interacting quantum master equation in *15. Interacting quantum fields* we are following Fredenhagen-Rejzner 11b, Rejzner 11, which in turn is taking clues from Hollands 07.

The discussion of quantization in *13. Quantization* takes clues from Hawkins 04, Collini 16 and spells out the derivation of the Moyal star product from geometric quantization of symplectic groupoids due to Gracia-Bondia & Varilly 94.

The perspective on the Wick algebra in *14. Free quantum fields* goes back to Dito 90 and was revived for pAQFT in Dütsch-Fredenhagen 00. The proof of the folklore result that the perturbative Hadamard vacuum state on the Wick algebra is indeed a state is cited from Dütsch 18.

The discussion of causal perturbation theory in *15. Scattering* follows the original Epstein-Glaser 73. The relevance here of the star product induced by the Feynman propagator was highlighted in (Fredenhagen-Rejzner 12). Our derivation of Feynman diagrammatics is due to Keller 10.

(…)

**Acknowledgement**

These notes profited greatly from discussions with Igor Khavkine.

Thanks also to Marco Benini, Klaus Fredenhagen, Arnold Neumaier, Kasia Rejzner for helpful discussion.

## Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!