Physics Forums Insights
  • Physics
    • Physics Articles
    • Physics Tutorials
    • Physics Guides
    • Physics FAQs
  • Math
    • Math Articles
    • Math Tutorials
    • Math Guides
    • Math FAQs
  • Bio/Chem/Tech
    • Bio/Chem Articles
    • Computer Science Tutorials
    • Technology Guides
  • Education
    • Education Articles
    • Education Guides
  • Interviews
  • Quizzes
  • Forums
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
gps2

The Schwarzschild Metric: The Photon Sphere

December 29, 2017/2 Comments/in Physics Articles/by Mark Stuckey
📖Read Time: 5 minutes
📊Readability: Advanced 📐 (Technical knowledge needed)
🔖Core Topics: equationobservereqhoveringmetric

 

A Short Proof of Birkoff’s Theorem derived the Schwarzschild metric in units of ##G = c = 1##:

\begin{equation} ds^2 = -\left(1 – \frac{2M}{r}\right)dt^2 + \left(1 – \frac{2M}{r}\right)^{-1}dr^2 + r^2d\theta^2 + r^2 \sin^2\theta d\phi^2   \label{metric} \end{equation}

and I used that metric in The Schwarzschild Metric: Part 1, GPS Satellites to show that Global Positioning System (GPS) clocks in orbit around Earth run faster than Earth-based clocks. We saw that without the appropriate general relativistic correction, GPS tracking would be off by over 11 km per day. In this Insight, I want to use a result from Part 1, GPS Satellites to discuss the “photon sphere,” i.e., the radial coordinate at which photons orbit ##M##.

In Part 1, GPS Satellites, I showed that proper time lapse ##\Delta\tau_o## for an observer in circular, geodetic orbit at ##r = r_o## about ##M## is:

\begin{equation} \Delta\tau_o = \sqrt{1 – \frac{3M}{r_o}}\, \Delta t  \label{OrbitObsTime} \end{equation}

where ##\Delta t## is coordinate time lapse, i.e., proper time lapse for an observer far from, and at rest with respect to, ##M##. We notice immediately from this equation that ##\Delta\tau_o = 0## at ##r_o = 3M##. Proper time lapse equals zero on null worldlines, i.e., photon paths, by definition. Thus, we see that photons will orbit ##M## at ##r_o = 3M##, so this is called the “photon sphere.” That means an observer hovering at ##r_o = 3M## would see the bottoms of his feet when he looked up (chest and back aligned radially), since light emitted from the bottoms of his feet would orbit ##M## and return to his location from “above.” Essentially, he would see an inverted ring image of himself at the photon sphere [1].

In order to hover there, the observer would have to accelerate per general relativity (GR), i.e., an observer in free fall (geodetic motion) is not accelerating per GR. This differs from Newtonian physics where the hovering observer’s acceleration would be zero while the free fall observer would be accelerating. To find the GR acceleration ##overrightarrow{a}## of this hovering observer using the Schwarzschild metric Eq(ref{metric}), we need to compute the deviation from geodetic motion. That is given by:

\begin{equation} \overrightarrow{a} = \nabla_{\overrightarrow{v}}\overrightarrow{v} \label{accelEq} \end{equation}

where ##\overrightarrow{v}## is the 4-velocity of the hovering observer and ##\nabla## is the covariant derivative. The RHS of Eq(\ref{accelEq}) is:

\begin{equation} \left(\frac{d^2 x^i}{d\tau^2} + \Gamma^i_{jk} \frac{dx^j}{d\tau}\frac{dx^k}{d\tau}\right) \frac{\partial}{\partial x^i}   \label{GdscEq} \end{equation}

which we recognize from Part 1, GPS Satellites as the geodesic equation when set equal to zero. Again, the deviation from geodetic motion is acceleration in GR. The 4-velocity is defined to be:

\begin{equation} \overrightarrow{v} = \frac{d\overrightarrow{x}}{d\tau} \label{4velocity} \end{equation}

where ##\overrightarrow{x}## is the 4-position. For the hovering observer  ##\overrightarrow{x} = (t, r_o, \theta, \phi)## so

\begin{equation} \overrightarrow{v} = (\frac{dt}{d\tau},0,0,0) = (v^0,v^1,v^2,v^3) \label{4velocity2} \end{equation}

According to our metric Eq(\ref{metric}) we have:

\begin{equation} d\tau = \sqrt{1 – \frac{2M}{r_o}} dt  \label{HoverObsTime} \end{equation}

when ##dr = d\theta = d\phi = 0##, since ##ds^2 = -d\tau^2## along the worldline. Eq(\ref{4velocity2}) and Eq(\ref{HoverObsTime}) tell us:

\begin{equation} \overrightarrow{v} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 – \frac{2M}{r_o}}} \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \label{4velocity3} \end{equation}

Plugging this into Eq(\ref{accelEq}) we obtain:

\begin{equation} \overrightarrow{a} = v^i \nabla_{\frac{\partial}{\partial x^i}}\left(v^k \frac{\partial}{\partial x^k}\right) = \left(v^0\right)^2 \nabla_0 \frac{\partial}{\partial x^0} = \left(v^0\right)^2 \Gamma^j_{00}\frac{\partial}{\partial x^j} = \frac{1}{\left(1 – \frac{2M}{r_o}\right)}\Gamma^1_{00}\frac{\partial}{\partial r} \label{accelEq2} \end{equation}

since the only non-zero ##\Gamma^j_{00}## is ##\Gamma^1_{00} = \frac{M}{r_o^2}\left(1 – \frac{2M}{r_o}\right)##, as obtained in Part 1, GPS Satellites. This gives:

\begin{equation} \overrightarrow{a} = \frac{GM}{r_o^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial r} \label{accelEq3} \end{equation}

which looks very Newtonian except for the sign (I have restored ##G## for comparison). That is, per Newtonian physics an observer in free fall at ##r = r_o## would be accelerating at ##-\frac{GM}{r_o^2} \widehat{r}## (radially inward) while the hovering observer would have zero acceleration. In GR, it is the hovering observer who is accelerating radially outward since that is his deviation from geodetic (free fall) motion. The ##\frac{GM}{r_o^2}## piece in Eq(\ref{accelEq3}) looks very Newtonian, but that is deceptive since ##\frac{\partial}{\partial r}## is not a unit length vector like ##\widehat{r}## in the Newtonian acceleration. Instead,

\begin{equation} \frac{\partial}{\partial r} \cdotp \frac{\partial}{\partial r} = g_{rr} = \left(1 – \frac{2M}{r}\right)^{-1} \label{Grr} \end{equation}

so

\begin{equation} \frac{\partial}{\partial r} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\left(1 – \frac{2M}{r}\right)}}\widehat{r} \label{rhat} \end{equation}

Putting Eq(\ref{rhat}) into Eq(\ref{accelEq3}) we have:

\begin{equation} \overrightarrow{a} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\left(1 – \frac{2M}{r_o}\right)}}\frac{GM}{r_o^2}\widehat{r} \label{accelEq4} \end{equation}

as given in The Schwarzschild Geometry: Part 1. Notice that attempting to hover at ##r_o = 2M##, i.e., the event horizon of a black hole, requires infinite acceleration (infinite force). There is much more on  black holes in The Schwarzschild Geometry: Part 1 and its companions.

The last thing I want to compute in this Insight is the speed of our geodetic orbiting observer as measured by our hovering observer. We have:

\begin{equation} v = \frac{r_o d\phi}{d\tau} \label{v} \end{equation}

where ##r_o d\phi## is the infinitesimal spatial distance (arc length) and ##d\tau## is the infinitesimal proper time, both as measured by the hovering observer. We found in Part 1, GPS Satellites, that:

\begin{equation} \frac{d\phi}{dt} = \sqrt{\frac{M}{r_o^3}}  \label{GdscEq4} \end{equation}

Using this and Eq(\ref{HoverObsTime}) in Eq{\ref{v}) we obtain:

\begin{equation} v = \frac{r_o}{\sqrt{\left(1 – \frac{2M}{r_o}\right)}} \sqrt{\frac{M}{r_o^3}} \label{v2} \end{equation}

Notice that at ##r_o = 3M## Eq(\ref{v2}) gives ##v = 1## or restoring ##c##, ##v = c##, as must be the case since we’re on the photon sphere.

References

  1. Stuckey, W.M.: The Schwarzschild black hole as a gravitational mirror, American Journal of Physics 61(5), 448–456 (1993).

 

 

Mark Stuckey

PhD in general relativity (1987), researching foundations of physics since 1994. Coauthor of “Beyond the Dynamical Universe” (Oxford UP, 2018) and “Einstein’s Entanglement” (Oxford UP, 2024).

More Related Articles

  • What is Mass Inflation? A 5 Minute Introduction
  • How to Solve Einstein’s Field Equations in Maxima
  • The Schwarzschild Metric: GPS Satellites
  • A Poor Man’s CMB Primer: The Birth of a Cosmic Background Radiation
  • Blockworld and Its Foundational Implications: Time Dilation and Length Contraction
  • Modern Physics Understood as an Unrecognized Kuhnian Revolution
Tags: GPS, Schwarzschild metric
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/gps2.png 135 240 Mark Stuckey https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Physics_Forums_Insights_logo.png Mark Stuckey2017-12-29 15:59:172021-01-04 22:20:08The Schwarzschild Metric: The Photon Sphere
You might also like
gps3 The Schwarzschild Metric: A Newtonian Comparison
gps1 The Schwarzschild Metric: GPS Satellites
2 replies
  1. Greg Bernhardt says:
    January 2, 2018 at 10:06 pm
    Urs Schreiber

    The link behind is broken (it tries to take one to the edit page of the intended page)Fixed, thanks!

    Log in to Reply
  2. Urs Schreiber says:
    January 2, 2018 at 10:00 pm

    The link behind and I used that metric in The Schwarzschild Metric: Part 1, GPS Satellites is broken (it tries to take one to the edit page of the intended page)

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Trending Articles

  • Revisiting the Velocity-Time Function
  • Time Dilation & Redshift of Schwarzschild Black Holes
  • What Planck Length Is and It’s Common Misconceptions
  • Richard Feynman Quiz: Think You Know Richard Feynman?
  • Why 1 Equals 0.999… — Explanations & Rigorous Proofs
  • Learn Why Ohm’s Law Is Not a Law
  • Frequently Made Errors in Mechanics: Kinematics
  • Why the Need of Infinity in Physics
  • How Does an Airplane Wing Work? A Primer on Lift
  • Learn the Physics of Virtual Particles in Quantum Mechanics

Physics Forums

  • Classical Physics
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
  • Quantum Physics
  • Special and General Relativity
  • Beyond the Standard Model
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Cosmology
  • Other Physics Topics

Receive Insights Articles to Your Inbox

Enter your email address:

Blog Information

  • Become a Member!
  • Write for Us!
  • Table of Contents
  • Blog Author List

Popular Topics

astronomy (17) black holes (17) classical physics (35) cosmology (16) education (23) electromagnetism (19) general relativity (19) gravity (24) interview (21) mathematics (39) mathematics self-study (21) Physicist (26) programming (18) Quantum Field Theory (31) quantum mechanics (36) quantum physics (24) relativity (40) Special Relativity (16) technology (19) universe (21)
2026 © Physics Forums, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - Contact Us - Privacy Policy - About PF Insights
  • Link to X
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Youtube
Link to: Learn Gauge Fixing in Mathematical Quantum Field Theory Link to: Learn Gauge Fixing in Mathematical Quantum Field Theory Learn Gauge Fixing in Mathematical Quantum Field Theoryqft_gaugeLink to: 3 Tips for Calmer, Civil Debate and Better Conversations Link to: 3 Tips for Calmer, Civil Debate and Better Conversations debatetips3 Tips for Calmer, Civil Debate and Better Conversations
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top