Physics Forums Insights
  • Physics
    • Physics Articles
    • Physics Tutorials
    • Physics Guides
    • Physics FAQs
  • Math
    • Math Articles
    • Math Tutorials
    • Math Guides
    • Math FAQs
  • Bio/Chem/Tech
    • Bio/Chem Articles
    • Computer Science Tutorials
    • Technology Guides
  • Education
    • Education Articles
    • Education Guides
  • Interviews
  • Quizzes
  • Forums
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
gps3

The Schwarzschild Metric: A Newtonian Comparison

January 1, 2018/2 Comments/in Physics Articles/by Mark Stuckey
📖Read Time: 5 minutes
📊Readability: Advanced 📐 (Technical knowledge needed)
🔖Core Topics: equationeqmetricnewtoniandt

A Short Proof of Birkoff’s Theorem derived the Schwarzschild metric in units of ##G = c = 1##:

\begin{equation} ds^2 = -\left(1 – \frac{2M}{r}\right)dt^2 + \left(1 – \frac{2M}{r}\right)^{-1}dr^2 + r^2d\theta^2 + r^2 \sin^2\theta d\phi^2   \label{metric} \end{equation}

and I used that metric in The Schwarzschild Metric: Part 1, GPS Satellites to show that Global Positioning System (GPS) clocks in orbit around Earth run faster than Earth-based clocks. We saw that without the appropriate general relativistic correction, GPS tracking would be off by over 11 km per day. I then used that metric in The Schwarzschild Metric: Part 2, The Photon Sphere to discuss the “photon sphere,” i.e., the radial coordinate at which photons orbit ##M##. In this Insight, I will bring the Schwarzschild metric to bear on a simple Newtonian problem, i.e., throwing a ball up into the air from the surface of Earth. While this problem is trivial in Newtonian physics, it’s actually tougher than the problems solved in Parts 1 & 2 of this series using GR. While it’s certainly not advisable to use GR anytime Newtonian physics will suffice, I do so in this case to illustrate the relationship between GR and Newtonian physics.

Here are the two geodesic equations of relevance:

\begin{equation} \frac{d^2r}{d\tau^2} + \Gamma^{1}_{00}\left(\frac{dt}{d\tau}\right)^2 + \Gamma^{1}_{11}\left(\frac{dr}{d\tau}\right)^2 = 0  \label{RgdscEq} \end{equation}

and

\begin{equation} \frac{d^2t}{d\tau^2} + 2\Gamma^{0}_{10}\left(\frac{dt}{d\tau}\right) \left(\frac{dr}{d\tau}\right) = 0     \label{TgdscEq} \end{equation}

where ##\tau## is proper time along the geodesic and, as in Parts 1 & 2 of this series, ##x^0 = t, x^1 = r, x^2 = \theta, x^3 = \phi##. The Christoffel symbols we need are:

\begin{equation} \Gamma^{1}_{00} = \frac{M}{r^2} \left(1 – \frac{2M}{r}\right)  \label{Christoffelrtt} \end{equation}

\begin{equation} \Gamma^{1}_{11} = -\frac{M}{r^2} \left(1 – \frac{2M}{r}\right)^{-1}   \label{Christoffelrrr} \end{equation}

\begin{equation} \Gamma^{0}_{10} = \frac{M}{r^2} \left(1 – \frac{2M}{r}\right)^{-1}   \label{Christoffelttr} \end{equation}

Putting Eq(\ref{Christoffelttr}) into Eq(\ref{TgdscEq}) gives:

\begin{equation} \frac{d}{d\tau}\left(\left(1 – \frac{2M}{r}\right)\frac{dt}{d\tau}\right) = 0  \label{TgdscEq2} \end{equation}

which means:

\begin{equation}\left(1 – \frac{2M}{r}\right)\frac{dt}{d\tau} = B \label{TgdscEq3} \end{equation}

with ##B## a constant. At ##r = \infty## and ##v = 0 ## the metric Eq(\ref{metric}) tells us that ##d\tau = dt ##, since ## ds^2 = -d\tau^2 ## along the geodesic, so Eq(\ref{TgdscEq3}) then tells us ##B = 1 ## when our object is launched with escape velocity ##v = v_e ##. If we get to ##r = \infty## with ## v > 0 ##, then our metric Eq(\ref{metric}) tells us:

\begin{equation} \frac{d\tau}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}} = dt \label{SReqn} \end{equation}

(I restored ##c## here) which tells us ##\frac{dt}{d\tau} > 1 ## so Eq(\ref{TgdscEq3}) says ##B > 1 ## when the object is launched with ##v > v_e ##. Therefore, we assume ##B < 1## when the object is launched with ##v < v_e ##. We’ll need this info on ##B## when we get to our result.

Using this result and putting our other two Christoffel symbols Eq(\ref{Christoffelrtt}) and Eq(\ref{Christoffelrrr}) into our first geodesic equation Eq(\ref{RgdscEq}) gives:

\begin{equation} \left(1 – \frac{2M}{r}\right)\frac{d^2r}{d\tau^2} + \frac{M}{r^2}\left(B^2 – \left(\frac{dr}{d\tau}\right)^2 \right) = 0  \label{RgdscEq2} \end{equation}

Now I will start making approximations to show this leads to the Newtonian conservation of energy equation:

\begin{equation} \frac{1}{2}v^2 – \frac{GM}{r} = \frac{E}{m}  \label{Newton} \end{equation}

where ##\frac{E}{m}## is the (conserved) total energy per unit mass of the launched object (I restored ##G##). Start by assuming ##\frac{d^2r}{d\tau^2} = -g = -\frac{GM}{R^2}## where ##R## is the radius of Earth and M is the mass of Earth, i.e., ##g = 9.8 m/s^2## per usual. Next let ##r = R+y## so that ##\frac{dr}{d\tau} = \frac{dy}{d\tau} = v##, i.e., ##y## is the height above Earth’s surface of our projectile; we will assume ##y## is small compared to ##R##. Now Eq(\ref{RgdscEq2}) gives us:

\begin{equation} -\left(1 – \frac{2GMR}{c^2R^2\left(1+y/R\right)}\right)g + \frac{GM}{R^2\left(1+y/R\right)^2}\left(B^2 – \frac{v^2}{c^2} \right) = 0  \label{RgdscEq3} \end{equation}

where I have restored ##G## and ##c##. Expanding:

\begin{equation}\left(1 + \frac{y}{R} \right)^{-1} \approx 1 – \frac{y}{R} \label{approx1} \end{equation}

and

\begin{equation} \left(1 + \frac{y}{R} \right)^{-2} \approx 1 – 2\frac{y}{R} \label{approx2} \end{equation}

and putting these into Eq(\ref{RgdscEq3}) and rearranging we obtain:

\begin{equation}\left(\frac{1}{2} – \frac{y}{R}\right)v^2 + gy = \left(\frac{1}{2} – \frac{y}{R}\right)B^2c^2 – \frac{c^2}{2} + gR \label{RgdscEq4} \end{equation}

Since ##\frac{y}{R} \ll 1 ##, we have ##\left(\frac{1}{2} – \frac{y}{R}\right) \approx \frac{1}{2}##, so Eq(\ref{RgdscEq4}) is now:

\begin{equation}\frac{1}{2}v^2 + gy = \frac{\left(B^2 – 1\right)c^2}{2} + gR \label{RgdscEq5} \end{equation}

The ##gy## on the LHS of Eq(\ref{RgdscEq5}) and ##gR## on the RHS come from ##-\frac{GM}{R\left(1+y/R\right)}## expanded on the LHS of the Newtonian conservation of energy equation Eq(\ref{Newton}) then using ## g = \frac{GM}{R^2}##. That means ## \frac{\left(B^2 – 1\right)c^2}{2}## in Eq(\ref{RgdscEq5}) is our total conserved energy per unit mass ##\frac{E}{m}## from the RHS of Eq(\ref{Newton}). Notice that for ##v = v_e## at launch we have ##B = 1## and the RHS of Eq(\ref{RgdscEq5}) is just ##gR## as expected (total energy equals zero in Eq(\ref{Newton})). If ##v > v_e## at launch, ##B > 1## and the RHS of Eq(\ref{RgdscEq5}) is a little larger than ##gR## (total energy is positive in Eq(\ref{Newton})). If ##v < v_e## at launch, ##B < 1## and the RHS of Eq(\ref{RgdscEq5}) is a little smaller than ##gR## (total energy is negative in Eq(\ref{Newton})).

That concludes my outline of how the geodesic equations for the Schwarzschild metric give rise to standard Newtonian physics for an object launched slowly upwards near the surface of Earth.

 

Mark Stuckey

PhD in general relativity (1987), researching foundations of physics since 1994. Coauthor of “Beyond the Dynamical Universe” (Oxford UP, 2018) and “Einstein’s Entanglement” (Oxford UP, 2024).

More Related Articles

  • How to Solve Einstein’s Field Equations in Maxima
  • Learn Orbital Precession in the Schwarzschild and Kerr Metrics
  • Oppenheimer-Snyder Model of Gravitational Collapse: Mathematical Details
  • The Schwarzschild Geometry: Physically Reasonable?
  • The Einstein Field Equation in a Static, Spherically Symmetric Spacetime
  • Slowly Lowering an Object in a Static, Spherically Symmetric Spacetime
Tags: GPS, Schwarzschild metric
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/gps3.png 135 240 Mark Stuckey https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Physics_Forums_Insights_logo.png Mark Stuckey2018-01-01 16:44:082021-01-04 22:19:26The Schwarzschild Metric: A Newtonian Comparison
You might also like
gps1 The Schwarzschild Metric: GPS Satellites
gps2 The Schwarzschild Metric: The Photon Sphere
2 replies
  1. Greg Bernhardt says:
    January 2, 2018 at 10:07 pm
    Urs Schreiber

    The link behind is broken (it tries to take one to the edit pane of the intended page).Fixed, thanks!

    Log in to Reply
  2. Urs Schreiber says:
    January 2, 2018 at 9:53 pm

    The link behind and I used that metric in The Schwarzschild Metric: Part 1, GPS Satellites is broken (it tries to take one to the edit pane of the intended page).

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Trending Articles

  • Quantum Mechanics and the Famous Double-slit Experiment
  • Explosion-Generated Collapsing Vacuum Bubbles Reach 20,000 Kelvin
  • Can We See an Atom?
  • Why Entangled Photon-Polarization Qubits Violate Bell’s Inequality per Quantum Information Theory
  • Why the Quantum | A Response to Wheeler’s 1986 Paper
  • Inventions and Inventors Quiz and Trivia
  • Have Scientists Seen an Electron? How We Detect Them
  • How to Apply Newton’s Second Law to Variable Mass Systems
  • John Baez Interview — Mathematical Physicist & Networks
  • The Fundamental Difference in Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics

Physics Forums

  • Classical Physics
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
  • Quantum Physics
  • Special and General Relativity
  • Beyond the Standard Model
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Cosmology
  • Other Physics Topics

Receive Insights Articles to Your Inbox

Enter your email address:

Blog Information

  • Become a Member!
  • Write for Us!
  • Table of Contents
  • Blog Author List

Popular Topics

astronomy (17) black holes (17) classical physics (35) cosmology (16) education (23) electromagnetism (19) general relativity (19) gravity (24) interview (21) mathematics (39) mathematics self-study (21) Physicist (26) programming (18) Quantum Field Theory (31) quantum mechanics (36) quantum physics (24) relativity (40) Special Relativity (16) technology (19) universe (21)
2026 © Physics Forums, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - Contact Us - Privacy Policy - About PF Insights
  • Link to X
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Youtube
Link to: 3 Tips for Calmer, Civil Debate and Better Conversations Link to: 3 Tips for Calmer, Civil Debate and Better Conversations 3 Tips for Calmer, Civil Debate and Better ConversationsdebatetipsLink to: Demystifying the Chain Rule in Calculus Link to: Demystifying the Chain Rule in Calculus Demystifying the Chain Rule in Calculus
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top