What is the net electric force on the charge at the origin?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the net electric force and electric field at the origin due to three charges arranged in a triangle. The net electric force on the charge at the origin is determined to be 2.5*10^-6, with a direction of -102.38 degrees. There is confusion regarding the distinction between electric force and electric field, as part 3 requires calculating the electric field rather than the force. The electric field can be calculated using the formula E = kq/r^2 for each charge, and vector addition is necessary to find the net field. Clarification is provided that the electric field and force are different quantities, emphasizing the need for accurate calculations.
sushi362
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider three charges in a triangle as shown.

1. What is the net electric force on the charge at the origin?

2. What is the direction of this force(between -180 and 180)?

3. What is the magnitude of the net electric field at the position of the charge at the origin?

4. What is the direction of the net electric field?



Homework Equations



E = Kc * Q/r^2



The Attempt at a Solution



I solved part 1, to be 2.5*10^-6
part 2 is -102.38

i have no clue what to do for part 3.
once i figure that out, i should be able to do part 4.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2013-02-07 at 12.17.27 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2013-02-07 at 12.17.27 AM.png
    2.4 KB · Views: 988
Physics news on Phys.org


You listed the equation for the electric field, why not use it?
 


Net electric field is found form the electric field created by the charges.

Electric field is also a vector quantity which can be summed.

E = kq/r2

You should be able to find the electric field for each charge and through vector addition, find the net field.

Also consider: The charge at the origin does have a field, but if a test charge is at the origin too, (directly in the middle of the charge at the origin), will the test charge be affected by the field of the charge at the origin?
 


tms said:
You listed the equation for the electric field, why not use it?

so #3 is the same as #1?

i used the equation to calculate the e field for the 2 points: origin to the right of the origin, and origin to south of origin. then i took the square root of the squares of those values, and got part 1 again?
 


sushi362 said:
so #3 is the same as #1?
No. #1 wants the force while #3 wants the field. They aren't the same. The equation you wrote down under "Relevant equations" is for the field.

Show us your calculations.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top