Physics Forums Insights
  • Physics
    • Physics Articles
    • Physics Tutorials
    • Physics Guides
    • Physics FAQs
  • Math
    • Math Articles
    • Math Tutorials
    • Math Guides
    • Math FAQs
  • Bio/Chem/Tech
    • Bio/Chem Articles
    • Computer Science Tutorials
    • Technology Guides
  • Education
    • Education Articles
    • Education Guides
  • Interviews
  • Quizzes
  • Forums
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
angularvelocity

Elementary Construction of the Angular Velocity

June 2, 2016/1 Comment/in Physics Tutorials/by wrobel
📖Read Time: 3 minutes
📊Readability: Advanced 📐(contains math) (Technical knowledge needed)
🔖Core Topics: boldsymboldotphiomegaBA

Physics books seldom contain an accurate definitions of the angular velocity of a rigid body. I believe that the following construction is as simple as possible and also rigorous.

Table of Contents

  • Assume we have a rigid body which is moving in the space
  • Let us prove the theorem
  • The theorem is proved
    • More Related Articles

Assume we have a rigid body which is moving in the space

Theorem. In each moment there exists a unique (pseudo)vector ##\boldsymbol\omega ## such that for any two points ##A,B## of the rigid body the following formula holds
$$\boldsymbol v_A=\boldsymbol v_B+\boldsymbol \omega\times\boldsymbol {BA},\qquad (***)$$
here ##\boldsymbol v_A,\boldsymbol v_B## are the velocities of the points ##A,B## respectively.

Definition. The vector ##\boldsymbol \omega## is called the angular velocity.

Before proving this theorem we formulate a lemma. Let ##\boldsymbol e_1,\boldsymbol e_2,\boldsymbol e_3## be a right orthonormal basis frozen into the rigid body. Introduce a vector
$$\boldsymbol \omega_*=(\dot{\boldsymbol e}_2,\boldsymbol e_3)\boldsymbol e_1+(\dot{\boldsymbol e}_3,\boldsymbol e_1)\boldsymbol e_2+(\dot{\boldsymbol e}_1,\boldsymbol e_2)\boldsymbol e_3.\qquad (*)$$

Lemma. The following formulas hold $$\dot{\boldsymbol e}_k=\boldsymbol \omega_*\times {\boldsymbol e}_k,\quad k=1,2,3.\qquad (**)$$
Indeed, differentiating the equlities ##({\boldsymbol e}_k,{\boldsymbol e}_j)=\delta_{kj}## we get
##(\dot{\boldsymbol e}_k,\boldsymbol e_j)=-(\dot{\boldsymbol e}_j,\boldsymbol e_k)## and particularly ##(\dot{\boldsymbol e}_k,\boldsymbol e_k)=0##. Due to these formulas one can substitute (*) into (**) to make sure that the lemma is correct.

Let us prove the theorem

A) Existence. Let ##O## be the origin of some fixed frame. Differentiating the identity ##\boldsymbol{OA}=\boldsymbol{OB}+\boldsymbol{BA}## we have
$$\boldsymbol v_A=\boldsymbol v_B+\frac{d}{dt}\boldsymbol{BA}.$$
On the other hand we can write ##\boldsymbol{BA}=\sum_{i=1}^3 x_i\boldsymbol e_i.## From lemma it follows that
$$\frac{d}{dt}\boldsymbol{BA}=\sum_{i=1}^3 x_i\dot{\boldsymbol e}_i=\sum_{i=1}^3 x_i\boldsymbol\omega_*\times{\boldsymbol e}_i=\boldsymbol\omega_*\times \boldsymbol{BA}.$$ Consequently there exists at least one vector that satisfies the theorem. This vector is ##\boldsymbol \omega_*.## In the sequel we drop the subscript *.

B) Uniqueness. Assume that there is another vector ##\boldsymbol \omega’## such that $$\boldsymbol v_A=\boldsymbol v_B+\boldsymbol \omega’\times\boldsymbol {BA}.$$
Subtracting this formula from the formula (***) we obtain
##(\boldsymbol \omega-\boldsymbol \omega’)\times\boldsymbol {BA}=0.## Since ##\boldsymbol {BA}## is an arbitrary vector we have ##\boldsymbol \omega=\boldsymbol \omega’##.

The theorem is proved

Example. Let ##OXYZ## be a fixed Cartesian frame. And the rigid body rotates around the axis ##OZ## such that ##\boldsymbol e_Z=\boldsymbol e_3## and
$$\boldsymbol e_1=\cos\phi\boldsymbol e_X+\sin\phi\boldsymbol e_Y,\quad \boldsymbol e_2=\cos\phi\boldsymbol e_Y-\sin\phi\boldsymbol e_X$$ here ##\phi=\phi(t)## is the angle of rotation of the rigid body.

Then differentiate these formulas ##\dot{\boldsymbol e}_1=\dot\phi\cos\phi\boldsymbol e_Y-\dot\phi\sin\phi\boldsymbol e_X=\dot\phi \boldsymbol e_2.## In the same way we get ##\dot{\boldsymbol e}_2=-\dot\phi \boldsymbol e_1.## Substitute these equalities in (*) to get ## \boldsymbol \omega=\dot\phi \boldsymbol e_Z.##

 

 

wrobel
wrobel

PhD – Interested in differential equations and classical mechanics

More Related Articles

  • Presenting a Rare Kinematic Formula
  • Learn Basic Kinematics in Classical Mechanics
Tags: classical physics
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/angularvelocity.png 135 240 wrobel https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Physics_Forums_Insights_logo.png wrobel2016-06-02 17:06:592021-04-17 15:48:05Elementary Construction of the Angular Velocity
You might also like
model magnet How to Model a Magnet Falling Through a Solenoid
mechanical conservation of energy Why Bother Teaching Mechanical Energy Conservation?
what is impedance Impedance in AC Circuits: Definition & Key Equations
Diffraction Grating Spectrometer. Learn the Fundamentals of the Diffraction Grating Spectrometer
Conservation of Spin Angular Momentum Exploring Bell States and Conservation of Spin Angular Momentum
carcapacity Why Road Capacity Is Almost Independent of the Speed Limit
1 reply
  1. Greg Bernhardt
    Greg Bernhardt says:
    June 8, 2016 at 12:09 am

    Thanks for the post! This is an automated courtesy bump. Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information,  come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Trending Articles

  • Why There Are Maximum Mass Limits for Compact Objects
  • Light and Sound Interactions: Photoacoustic & Acousto-Optic
  • Balloon Analogy Explained: Cosmology, Expansion & Limits
  • The Block Universe – Refuting a Common Argument
  • Is Pressure A Source Of Gravity?
  • Mathematics Fields & Applications: A Structured Guide
  • The Orin Fractional Calculus
  • Android Rooting & Magisk Guide: Systemless Root Tips
  • Why You Can’t Quantum Tunnel Through a Wall
  • What Planck Length Is and It’s Common Misconceptions

Physics Forums

  • Classical Physics
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
  • Quantum Physics
  • Special and General Relativity
  • Beyond the Standard Model
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Cosmology
  • Other Physics Topics

Receive Insights Articles to Your Inbox

Enter your email address:

Blog Information

  • Become a Member!
  • Write for Us!
  • Table of Contents
  • Blog Author List

Popular Topics

astronomy (17) black holes (17) classical physics (35) cosmology (16) education (23) electromagnetism (19) general relativity (19) gravity (24) interview (21) mathematics (39) mathematics self-study (21) Physicist (26) programming (18) Quantum Field Theory (31) quantum mechanics (36) quantum physics (24) relativity (40) Special Relativity (16) technology (19) universe (21)
2026 © Physics Forums, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - Contact Us - Privacy Policy - About PF Insights
  • Link to X
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Youtube
Link to: Why Your Software is Never Perfect Link to: Why Your Software is Never Perfect Why Your Software is Never PerfectsoftwarenotperfectLink to: A Black Hole Problem From Greg Egan’s “Incandescence” Link to: A Black Hole Problem From Greg Egan’s “Incandescence” A Black Hole Problem From Greg Egan’s “Incandescence”
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top