DSLR Guide: Lenses, Aberrations, Filters & Techniques
Table of Contents
I’m ready for a DSLR!
These cameras were originally designed for professionals. Users of DSLRs are expected to already understand basic digital photography techniques: in-camera electronic image processing enhances good technique but does not compensate for poor technique.
Key distinctions
Two key distinctions set DSLRs apart from bridge or compact cameras. First, the lens is removable on a DSLR. Lens performance matters more because a high-quality lens will often outlast camera bodies. Second, DSLR sensors are much larger than those in compact cameras — many approach or match 35 mm film size, and some medium-format digital options exist. A DSLR paired with a well-corrected lens, built on a century of optical design, can approach physical limits of imaging quality.
Lens mounts and compatibility
As with film cameras, manufacturers use proprietary lens mounts that can make switching systems costly if you already own good glass. Mounts include Nikon F, Sony E, Pentax K, Leica M, and Canon EF. Note that modern DSLRs typically have negligible lag times.
Classification of lenses
Focal length and standard lens
Lenses are usually described by their 35 mm equivalent focal length. A 50 mm lens on 35 mm format is considered “standard” because its field of view and magnification closely match normal human vision.
Common lens types
Common classifications:
- Wide-angle: shorter focal lengths; extreme wide-angle or “fisheye” lenses (≈10 mm or less) can exceed a 180° field of view.
- Portrait: roughly 70–90 mm.
- Telephoto: longer lengths (200 mm and up). Very long telephotos (1,200 mm+) approach telescope-like views.
Zoom and kit lenses
Zoom lenses vary focal length by moving internal elements while largely preserving focus. The common DSLR “kit” lens is typically a zoom; you do not have to buy it if you prefer different glass.
Specialty lenses
Specialty lenses:
- Tilt–shift (perspective control): lets you change the lens orientation relative to the sensor plane to correct perspective (useful for buildings) or to use the Scheimpflug condition (useful for extended focus planes in landscapes).
- Macro: designed for close-up focus and reproduction ratios up to or exceeding 1:1.
Note: focal length is not the same as focus distance, and “rear focal length” is not the same as physical distance from lens to sensor. Many wide-angle “retrofocus” designs position the rear element farther from the sensor than the rear focal length, while telephoto designs place the rear focal plane in front of the front element.
Consider whether the camera can be operated without a lens attached (useful for bellows or specialty adapters). That typically requires working in full manual mode.
Lens choice is highly opinionated among photographers, but investing time and money to get the best lens you can afford usually pays off in the long term.
Lens aberrations
What causes aberrations
This is a large subject; below is a concise, practical summary.
Aberrations arise because the paraxial approximation fails — that is, sin(θ) ≠ θ for larger angles. The paraxial approximation is very accurate at small angles (error ≈ 0.16% at f/5 and ≈ 1.3% at f/1.8). The dominant non-paraxial term produces “third-order” or Seidel (primary) aberrations. Each primary aberration represents an independent deviation of the aberrated wavefront from an ideal reference sphere.
Quick reference (definitions)
- Piston: A constant shift in wavefront phase; it does not affect image quality and is usually ignored.
- Tilt: A linear spatial shift in wavefront phase; like piston, tilt does not affect image quality and is typically neglected.
- Defocus: Simple focus error; camera lenses correct this with focusing mechanisms.
- Distortion: Variation of magnification with image height so straight lines do not remain straight. Barrel distortion bows lines outward; pincushion bows them inward. Distortion often does not change with aperture and can be very noticeable (you can detect ~0.5% distortion). Fisheye lenses intentionally exhibit high distortion.
- Coma: Variation of magnification with aperture across the image: point sources become comet-shaped, which is especially distracting for stars or distant lights.
- Field (Petzval) curvature: The image plane is curved rather than flat; a “plan” lens corrects field curvature over most of the image.
- Astigmatism: Breaks rotational symmetry; tangential and sagittal rays focus at different planes, producing directional blur. “Anastigmatic” lenses are corrected for astigmatism.
- Spherical aberration: Different aperture-zone rays focus at different planes. Spherical surfaces always exhibit this; “aplanatic” or aspheric-corrected lenses reduce it. Spherical aberration strongly influences the quality of out-of-focus rendering (“bokeh”).
- Chromatic aberration: Caused by dispersion (wavelength-dependent focus). Lateral chromatic aberration produces color fringing in-focus; axial chromatic aberration produces colored halos around points (spherochromatism). Achromatic doublets correct two wavelengths (e.g., blue and red), apochromats correct three, and superachromats correct four.
As aperture increases, aberrations generally grow and higher-order aberrations (5th, 7th, 9th order) become relevant. High-end lenses may be corrected to 9th order in manufacturing.
Falloff
Vignetting and flat-field correction
Images are typically brighter in the center than at the periphery because of geometric obliquity: intensity falls off roughly as cos^4(θ) at large incident angles. Wide-angle lenses at low f-numbers often show noticeable corner darkening (vignetting). Many digital cameras apply “flat field correction” to compensate for this.
Flare and bokeh
Flare
Flare — stray light that enters the lens at extreme angles and reflects internally, producing aperture ghosting or overall desaturation. Flare is often caused by bright sources like the sun and can be mitigated with lens hoods, black interior baffling, anti-reflective coatings, or careful filter use. Reflections between a filter and the front element can also cause glare.
Bokeh
Bokeh — a Japanese term describing the quality of out-of-focus rendering. “Ideal” bokeh often results from slightly undercorrected spherical aberration, producing smooth, gently blurred highlights. Overcorrected spherical aberration tends to produce bright halos and is generally considered less attractive.
Image stabilization
Stabilization methods
Camera motion matters for long exposures and long telephoto lenses. The most basic stabilization is mechanical support: tripod or monopod. Modern cameras and lenses often include motion-compensating mechanisms (in-lens or in-body stabilization). Manufacturers use different approaches; each has trade-offs, but stabilization typically lets you shoot at shutter speeds several stops slower than otherwise possible.
Other techniques: mirror lockup (reduces vibration from moving mirrors), and remote shutter release or cable releases to prevent camera motion when triggering the shutter.
Filters
Common filter types
Common screw-on filters include:
- UV / protective filter: blocks ultraviolet and provides a protective front surface.
- Graduated filters: neutral density or colored gradients to balance bright skies and dark foregrounds; they can be rotated for orientation.
- Polarizers: linear and circular types; circular polarizers (linear polarizer + quarter-wave retarder) are generally preferred because they work with modern autofocus and metering systems. Note: if a zoom lens rotates its front element during zooming, a polarizer orientation will change with zoom and be harder to control.
Rule of 16
Quick exposure guide
The “rule of 16” (from film days) gives a starting exposure in bright sun: aperture f/16 with shutter speed ≈ 1/ISO. For ISO 100, use ~1/100 s; for ISO 1600, ~1/1600 s. Each f-number step halves or doubles light, so the rule provides a quick aperture/shutter estimate.
Hyperfocal distance
Formula and example
The hyperfocal distance maximizes depth of field: when focused at the hyperfocal distance H, everything from H/2 to infinity appears acceptably sharp. Analytically:
[tex] H = fleft(frac{f}{Fc}+1right)[/tex]
where f is focal length, F is f-number, and c is the circle-of-confusion diameter. There are also series relations (focusing at H/2 yields depth from H to H/3, etc.). Example: a 28 mm lens at f/16 on 35 mm format has H ≈ 1.6 m, so everything from ~0.8 m to infinity is acceptably sharp when focused at 1.6 m.
Telephoto lenses have much larger hyperfocal distances (e.g., a 200 mm lens at f/16 on 35 mm has H ≈ 86 m), making them poor choices for foreground-inclusive landscapes.
Nodal, principal, and focal planes
Key optical points
Optical systems are described by six cardinal points: front/rear focal points, front/rear principal points, and front/rear nodal points; also important are the aperture stop and entrance/exit pupils.
Focal points: rays parallel to the optical axis focus at the rear focal point; when focused at infinity the sensor plane coincides with the rear focal plane.
Nodal points: front and rear nodal points are conjugate with unit angular magnification: rays entering the front nodal point at a given angle exit the rear nodal point at the same angle. In air, the nodal points coincide with principal points.
Principal points: the intersection of a principal plane and the optical axis. Rays intersecting the front principal plane at a height exit the rear principal plane at the same height (unit transverse magnification). The distance from a focal point to its principal point is the focal length.
Entrance/Exit pupils: the aperture stop limits the cone of rays; its projection into object space is the entrance pupil and into image space the exit pupil. All light that reaches the sensor must pass through the entrance pupil, aperture stop, and exit pupil.
Panoramic imaging and no-parallax point
Panoramic imaging: confusion often arises when rotating a camera to capture a wide field. Rotating a lens about the rear nodal point produces no image parallax (used in swing-lens panoramic cameras with curved image planes). For stitched panoramas using a flat sensor, rotate the lens about the entrance pupil (often called the “no-parallax point”) to eliminate parallax between near and far objects.
Miscellany
Flash and lighting
Flash: On-camera flash may be insufficient; many systems support off-camera or multi-unit flash control, including wireless control of a bank of strobes.
Adapters and compatibility
Lens adapters and converters: adapters allow lenses from one mount to be used on another. Functionality may be reduced (e.g., Nikon “G” lenses lack aperture rings). Adapting generally works easiest when the camera’s mount places the sensor closer to the lens (adapter acts as a simple spacer to match flange distances).
Final note
I want the best digital camera regardless of cost.
A: Physics Forums does not endorse specific camera or lens manufacturers. Our members are available to answer detailed questions or to discuss particular cameras and lenses.
PhD Physics – Associate Professor
Department of Physics, Cleveland State University








Update: Wide-angle/ultra-wide-angle/fisheye lenses
Note, unless otherwise specified, all focal lengths are in terms of the 35mm image format.
Recently, there has been a flurry of new high performance ultra-wide angle lenses introduced to the consumer market. The imaging properties of these lenses are very different from other photographic lenses; the technique used with these lenses is also very different. Because they have not been easily available for very long, many people have not had a chance to use one, so I thought an ‘update’ about this type of lens may be of value. There are many online guides explaining how to compose a photograph using an ultrawide, for example:
https://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-get-the-best-results-from-ultra-wide-lenses/
These lenses have fields of view significantly wider than your natural vision, which for each eye is about 55 degrees, roughly equivalent to a 45mm focal length lens. Until fairly recently (around 2005), high performance camera lenses with focal lengths shorter than 18mm were generally difficult to find. Today, interchangeable camera users have access to many ‘rectilinear’ lenses with fields of view exceeding 110 degrees.
The distinction between wide angle and ultrawide angle is fuzzy, but a good rule of thumb is that if the lens focal length is shorter than the short side of the sensor (24mm for 35mm format), the lens is called ‘ultrawide’. ‘Fisheye’ lenses have fields of view up to and exceeding a full hemisphere. The primary distinction between a fisheye and an ultrawide is that an ultrawide lens is designed to minimize distortion, while the fisheye (including design variants such as orthographic projection lenses and f-theta lenses) is designed to incorporate significant amounts of distortion. In images acquired with an ultrawide lens, straight lines (ideally) stay straight- ultrawides are ‘rectilinear’ lenses.
The shortest focal length currently available (2017) is a 10mm “hyperwide” lens sporting a field of view of 130 degrees. Several companies provide 11mm focal length lenses, others offer 12mm, and 14mm/15mm lenses are now fairly commonplace. There are even several ultrawide zoom lenses and an ultrawide tilt-shift lens. To give you a sense of how the field of view varies with focal length, see this image:
https://phillipreeve.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/focal_length_comparison.jpg
While not indicated, a 50mm lens would only see the central group of 2 bookshelves and staircase.
Historically, wide-angle lens design began in 1862 and (in my opinion) reached a zenith with the Hypergon and Metrogon/Topogon lenses.
https://www.cameraquest.com/hyper.htm
http://camera-wiki.org/wiki/Metrogon
Note, however, these lenses were designed for large format film. Ultrawide angle lenses have several design issues unique to short focal lengths including falloff, flare, fabrication, filters, and (f)chromatic (f)aberrations.
Many design constraints for ultrawides are principally driven by the relatively large distance between the lens mounting flange and the sensor. On most cameras, this distance is longer than the lens’ back focal length, and the general lens design is known as a ‘retrofocus’ design, sort of the opposite of a telephoto lens design. Lenses placed closer to the image plane in general are easier to design and fabricate. Because of this, wide-angle lenses were developed for rangefinder cameras (and can be used on mirrorless cameras) well before SLR cameras. Rangefinder camera users had several choices for many decades. However, to the best of my knowledge, the only viable SLR ultrawides for many years were Nikon’s 15mm and 13mm lenses introduced in the late 1970s and early 1980s and discontinued shortly thereafter.
While some development of APC-format ultrawide lenses occurred in the early 2000s, modern high-performance 35mm format ultrawides didn’t really appear until around 2010 when Nikon, Canon, and Zeiss each introduced new high-performance fixed and zoom ultrawide lenses. More recently, additional companies have introduced high-performance ultrawide angle lenses for full frame 35mm cameras, with focal lengths going all the way down to 10mm (Voightlander hyperwide). There are several technical reasons why ultrawide lens design has lagged behind telephoto lenses.
Once reason is the size and shape of the front element. The shorter the focal length, the more strongly curved the front element must be- similar to fisheye lens design. As extreme examples, Sigma’s 14/1.8 lens has a 80mm aspherical front element, while the Nikkor 13/5.6 front element measures 110mm across. These types of front lens elements are incredibly difficult to manufacture and awe-inspiring to observe.
Strongly curved front elements are one reason why ultrawide lenses can be especially susceptible to flare/glare. Lenses designed for mirrorless/rangefinder mounts have smaller diameters, as the lens is placed physically closer to the sensor, which helps to reduce flare.
A second technical difficulty is correcting transverse chromatic aberration due to dispersion of those large, highly curved, lens elements. In general, the designs of all of these new lenses were enabled by the introduction of new types of optical glass (extra low dispersion and anomalous partial dispersion glass types) by the major foundries.
Falloff, the optical throughput as a function of image height, occurs because the entrance pupil, the projection of the aperture stop into object space, does not remain constant as the location in object space move off the optical axis: at more oblique incident angles, the round hole appears as an elliptical hole. Correcting for falloff becomes more difficult as the field of view increases. Two non-optical approaches include: a ‘star fan’ some Hypergons came supplied with, and center filters.
One potential problem unique to digital sensors is caused by the Bayer filter: ultrawide lenses generate rays that enter the sensor at extreme angles due to the large field of view. The Bayer filters may not perform the same way as it does for rays that enter at more moderate angles. As a result, there can be chromatic effects around the periphery of the image independent of any uncorrected transverse color aberration.
Similarly, the huge front element generally makes use of filters difficult or not possible. Aside from the increased size of filter, there often is no place for a filter in front of the lens- some 3rd party filter makers (Coker, etc) have developed contraptions allowing use of large square filters, and the old Nikkors have a slot in the rear of the lens. Using polarizers will create a strong effect in the sky (whether this is good or bad depends on your point of view). Again, the smaller diameter lenses associated with rangefinder/mirrorless have more filter options.
What’s new for SLR users is also true for other camera mounts: for C-mount cameras, for example, there are now 1.3mm focal length lenses with 135 degree field of view which are equivalent to the 10mm hyperwide.
How low can the designers go? It’s unclear, because I’m not sure how the front element scales with the focal length. Seeing how large the Nikkor 6mm/2.8 and Coastal Optics (Jenoptik) 7.45mm/2.8 front elements are gives some idea- just note that those are fisheye lenses, so the front element is quite a bit smaller than what would be required for a rectilinear lens of similar focal length. For comparison, the large format 60mm Hypergon has a 135 degree field of view, scaling this to a 35mm format gives a 7mm equivalent focal length- the 10mm hyperwide approaches the 60mm Hypergon in field of view, but provides improved throughput.
In summary, the recent explosion of high performance ultrawide lenses provides photographers a hugely expanded range of choices at the ‘other’ end of focal length.
[QUOTE="olivermsun, post: 5608924, member: 325015"]The Sony A6xxx and A7 series are current mirrorless cameras with very similar sensors to several (e.g., Nikon) DSLRs, and they show low-light performance very comparable to same-format DSLRs. Olympus m4/3 cameras also perform just fine, with allowance for the smaller sensor size.” Ah- this is helpful. As I said, different manufacturers implement technologies in their own way. The Sony A7 series embeds the AF sensor into the main image sensor, so there's no pickoff and no loss of light. Similarly, use of an electronic front curtain shutter allows for elimination of one of the mechanical shutters (I think a back curtain shutter is still required). https://www.mhohner.de/newsitem2/efcs
The Sony A6xxx and A7 series are current mirrorless cameras with very similar sensors to several (e.g., Nikon) DSLRs, and they show low-light performance very comparable to same-format DSLRs. Olympus m4/3 cameras also perform just fine, with allowance for the smaller sensor size.But, I think, for the purposes of understanding the DSLR-like choices on the market, it's more important to figure out what are the different fundamental constraints of various configurations and what creates those constraints. That's why I've been asking why you've said mirrorless cameras lose low-light sensitivity because they re-direct light somewhere other than the image sensor.
[QUOTE="olivermsun, post: 5607020, member: 325015"]I think I got your point, but I am disagreeing that the "throughput" of a mirrorless camera has to be any different from that of a reflex or rangefinder camera.”Maybe it would be helpful to identify the specific camera you are thinking about?
[QUOTE="Andy Resnick, post: 5606973, member: 20368"]I think you missed my point- my point is that the throughput is lower on a mirrorless camera as compared to either a reflex or rangefinder camera, it's less relevant where the re-directed light goes.”I think I got your point, but I am disagreeing that the "throughput" of a mirrorless camera has to be any different from that of a reflex or rangefinder camera.I replied about your SLT example because, while it's true that SLTs have lower throughput than a traditional SLR, they are not mirrorless cameras, so I don't think they are a relevant example.Finally, I do think it's relevant to explain where the re-directed light goes. If, as on a modern mirrorless camera, the light isn't re-directed anywhere but it goes straight to the image sensor, just as it does in a digital rangefinder or an SLR in "live view" mode with the mirror flipped up, then why would the mirrorless camera have any lower throughput than the others?
[QUOTE="olivermsun, post: 5605033, member: 325015"]Hmm, I don't understand why you chose this example then. The SLT is actually an SLR with a Pellicle mirror and an optical viewfinder, so it doesn't explain why mirrorless cameras should lose a fraction of a stop to the EVF.”I think you missed my point- my point is that the throughput is lower on a mirrorless camera as compared to either a reflex or rangefinder camera, it's less relevant where the re-directed light goes.
[QUOTE="Andy Resnick, post: 5605003, member: 20368"]Exactly.”Hmm, I don't understand why you chose this example then. The SLT is actually an SLR with a Pellicle mirror and an optical viewfinder, so it doesn't explain why mirrorless cameras should lose a fraction of a stop to the EVF.
[QUOTE="olivermsun, post: 5604998, member: 325015"]That depicts the so-called SLT (Translucent instead of Reflex) configuration, used by Sony and previously by Canon to remove the need for flipping the mirror at a small cost to the light transmitted to the sensor. In other respects it is essentially the same as a traditional AF SLR and provides an optical viewfinder.”Exactly.
[QUOTE="Andy Resnick, post: 5604890, member: 20368"]I expect different manufacturers have different approaches. Often, there is a pellicle beamsplitter that directs some light to the autofocus sensor:https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-4af617c02795fb9260f69dbaded8ddf9-c?convert_to_webp=true“That depicts the so-called SLT (Translucent instead of Reflex) configuration, used by Sony and previously by Canon to remove the need for flipping the mirror at a small cost to the light transmitted to the sensor. In other respects it is essentially the same as a traditional AF SLR and provides an optical viewfinder.
[QUOTE="olivermsun, post: 5604689, member: 325015"]Wait, doesn't the EVF usually get fed by the image sensor itself?”I expect different manufacturers have different approaches. Often, there is a pellicle beamsplitter that directs some light to the autofocus sensor:https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-4af617c02795fb9260f69dbaded8ddf9-c?convert_to_webp=true
[QUOTE="Andy Resnick, post: 5604594, member: 20368"]On the other hand, mirrorless cameras have a decreased optical throughout, because some of the light is permanently re-directed to the (digital) viewfinder. I don't know exact numbers, but AFAIK, this represents about a half-stop of light lost.”Wait, doesn't the EVF usually get fed by the image sensor itself?
Great work Andy! One left to publish!
[QUOTE="DrClaude, post: 5601923, member: 461323"]Nice Insight Andy.One thing I wonder about is why there is still an "R" in DSLR, now that we don't use film. Is there any advantage to not having the sensor exposed all the time? I can't think of many disadvantages, like the mirror vibrations you discuss yourself.”A few reasons (by no means exhaustive) why the reflex mirror/optical viewfinder still survives today:
Also, reasons not to have the sensor exposed all the time include heat/image noise, blooming, etc.Obviously, EVFs have many unique advantages, and most of their disadvantages relative to a reflex mirror/optical viewfinder are diminishing as EVFs continue to improve.
Nice Insight Andy.One thing I wonder about is why there is still an "R" in DSLR, now that we don't use film. Is there any advantage to not having the sensor exposed all the time? I can't think of many disadvantages, like the mirror vibrations you discuss yourself.
Good question. If I understand you, the sensor can't be exposed all the time, because then there's no way to set an exposure time. Mirrorless cameras have an electronic mechanism to 'wipe' the sensor prior to an exposure, and the main advantage to mirrorless systems is as you say- there's no mirror that moves, not only reducing vibrations but also decreasing the distance between lens mount and sensor, allowing for smaller lenses. Mirrorless cameras can easily use lenses designed for rangefinder cameras.On the other hand, mirrorless cameras have a decreased optical throughout, because some of the light is permanently re-directed to the (digital) viewfinder. I don't know exact numbers, but AFAIK, this represents about a half-stop of light lost.