Physics Forums Insights
  • Physics
    • Physics Articles
    • Physics Tutorials
    • Physics Guides
    • Physics FAQs
  • Math
    • Math Articles
    • Math Tutorials
    • Math Guides
    • Math FAQs
  • Bio/Chem/Tech
    • Bio/Chem Articles
    • Computer Science Tutorials
    • Technology Guides
  • Education
    • Education Articles
    • Education Guides
  • Interviews
  • Quizzes
  • Forums
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
redshiftblackholes

Time Dilation & Redshift of Schwarzschild Black Holes

September 30, 2015/76 Comments/in Physics Articles/by stevebd1
πŸ“–Read Time: 6 minutes
πŸ“ŠReadability: Accessible (Clear & approachable)
πŸ”–Core Topics: time, itex, horizon, black, tex

Table of Contents

  • Time dilation near a Schwarzschild black hole
  • Worked example: 12,000 solar-mass black hole
  • Gravitational redshift
  • Visual appearance from a distance β€” scout ship scenario
  • Approaching the horizon: extreme limits
  • Event horizon and fall time to singularity
  • Hovering observers, orbits, and proper distance
  • Falling from rest at infinity
    • More Related Articles

Time dilation near a Schwarzschild black hole

The following is an overview of the time-dilation and gravitational-redshift effects of a static (Schwarzschild) black hole. By general relativity, a strong gravitational field can slow down time. The closer you get to the event horizon of a black hole (if you could survive the tidal gravity gradients and g-forces and had propulsion to hold position), you would notice no local difference, but clocks near the horizon run slower compared with clocks far away. On returning from near the event horizon, depending on how close you were and how long you stayed, you would have aged less than people outside the black hole’s strong gravitational field. This difference can be calculated using the equation below.

[tex]\tau=t\sqrt{1-\frac{2Gm}{rc^2}}[/tex]

which can be rewritten as

[tex]\tau=t\sqrt{1-\frac{r_s}{r}}[/tex]

where [itex]\tau[/itex] β€” actual (proper) time experienced within the black hole’s gravitational field; [itex]t[/itex] β€” time observed from infinity; [itex]r_s[/itex] β€” Schwarzschild radius of a black hole (where [itex]r_s=2Gm/c^2[/itex]); and [itex]r[/itex] β€” the coordinate radius at which time was spent. ([itex]G[/itex] is the gravitational constant, [itex]m[/itex] the mass, and [itex]c[/itex] the speed of light.)

Worked example: 12,000 solar-mass black hole

For example, if an observer were to spend an observed 3 days at 1 km from the event horizon of a 12,000-solar-mass black hole, they would experience:

[tex]\tau=3\sqrt{1-\frac{35,444,396}{35,445,396}}[/tex]

[tex]\tau=0.01594\ \text{days = 23 minutes}^{**}[/tex]

Here t = 3 days, [itex]r_s=2Gm/c^2[/itex] which for a 12,000-solar-mass black hole equals 35,444,396 m. Being 1 km from the event horizon means r = r_s + 1000 m = 35,445,396 m.

*A 12,000 solar-mass black hole was chosen because tidal forces near the event horizon are tolerable. Using [tex]dg=(2Gm/r^3)dr[/tex] with dr β‰ˆ 2 m (approximate height of a person) gives dg β‰ˆ 71.5 g, which is ~7.3 g from head to toe and is marginally manageable.

**This 23-minute result assumes instantaneous travel to the mark and instantaneous return; otherwise time dilation during the approach and departure must be included.

Gravitational redshift

Electromagnetic signals emitted near a strong gravitational field are redshifted when observed from far away. The gravitational redshift is

[tex]z=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{2Gm}{rc^2}}}-1[/tex]

(the event horizon corresponds to a formally infinite redshift).

Redshift relates to wavelength change as

[tex]z=\frac{\lambda_o – \lambda_e}{\lambda_e}[/tex]

so

[tex]\lambda_o=(z \cdot \lambda_e) + \lambda_e[/tex]

where [itex]\lambda_o[/itex] is the wavelength observed at infinity and [itex]\lambda_e[/itex] is the emitted wavelength.

At 1 km from the event horizon in the worked example above, the redshift is z β‰ˆ 187.27. Visible green light at 550 nm would be stretched to about 103,549 nm (0.10355 mm or 103.55 ΞΌm), which lies in the far-infrared (FIR). For comparison, the Sun’s surface gravitational redshift is z β‰ˆ 0.0000021 (negligible), a 1.14 MβŠ™ white dwarf (radius β‰ˆ 4.5Γ—10^6 m) has z β‰ˆ 0.00037, and a 2 MβŠ™ neutron star (radius β‰ˆ 12 km) has z β‰ˆ 0.4034.

Light traveling the other direction (from outside in) will be blueshifted as it falls into the potential well; viewed from the hovering observer near the horizon, external light may be Doppler- and gravitationally blue-shifted into the X-ray or gamma-ray bands, with harsh consequences for the observer.

Visual appearance from a distance β€” scout ship scenario

Imagine a mothership at 1,000,000 km from the same 12,000-solar-mass black hole. Gravitational redshift there is minimal: a 550 nm emission would be observed at β‰ˆ560 nm at the mothership (still green). Time dilation is small but measurable: roughly 59 minutes near the black hole correspond to one hour at infinity.

A scout ship that can traverse 1,000,000 km almost instantaneously (average velocity ~30,000 km/s, 0.1c, covering the 1 million km in ~35 s) is sent toward the black hole. Because its velocity is nonrelativistic compared with c in terms of time-dilation effects for this example, time dilation due to speed is negligible for the trip (the scenario notes this: “Time dilation due to this velocity is virtually undetectable”).

As the scout approaches the black hole, gravitational redshifting progressively shifts its emitted light to longer wavelengths. Observed effects along the approach (approximate, descriptive):

  • At large separations the scout appears slightly orange due to combined motion and mild redshift.
  • By ~100,000 km, the scout appears deep red (e.g., light stretched from 600 nm to ~650 nm).
  • By ~50,000 km it fades from visible sight and requires infrared instrumentation to track.
  • At ~10,000 km, time dilation becomes significant: 30 s on the scout appears as ~60 s to the mothership (the scout appears half speed).
  • At ~1 km from the horizon the scout’s emission is far-infrared and appears to β€œhover” for 3 days as seen by the mothership, while the scout’s proper time at that radius is only ~23 minutes.

When the scout returns, its signals blueshift back through infrared into visible light as it climbs out, and its apparent speed from the mothership recovers as local time dilation weakens. From the scout’s perspective, it was at maximum speed the whole time and experienced only ~35 seconds to reach the hover point, ~23 minutes there, and the return transit.

***The gravitational acceleration quoted in the original scenario is given by the formula shown later: [itex]g=Gm/(r^2\sqrt(1-r_s/r))[/itex].

Approaching the horizon: extreme limits

Time dilation and redshift grow extreme as r β†’ r_s. For the 12,000 MβŠ™ example, at r = r_s + 1 m (1 m from the horizon) the same 3-day observed interval corresponds to:

[tex]\tau=3\sqrt{1-\frac{35,444,396}{35,444,397}}[/tex]

[tex]\tau=0.0005\ \text{days = 43 seconds}[/tex]

At that radius the redshift would be z β‰ˆ 5,957.83; a 550 nm emission would be shifted to β‰ˆ3,277,358 nm (β‰ˆ3.277 mm), well into long-wavelength radio.

At r = r_s + 5 mm:

[tex]\tau=3\sqrt{1-\frac{35,444,396}{35,444,396.005}}[/tex]

[tex]\tau=0.000036\ \text{days = 3 seconds}[/tex]

Redshift here is z β‰ˆ 104,962.52; 550 nm would be shifted to β‰ˆ57,729,938 nm (β‰ˆ57.73 mm). Within the last few millimetres before the horizon, emitted light is shifted to very low frequencies (long wavelengths), and observers at infinity would see your clock run extremely fast in their frame while your proper time is nearly frozen.

Event horizon and fall time to singularity

At the horizon itself, a hovering observer (an idealized concept) would see extreme effects; a free-falling observer who crosses the horizon will reach the singularity in a short proper time. The time-to-singularity for a static Schwarzschild black hole can be estimated by the expression below (given in the original text):

[itex]M \pi/c = Gm \pi/c^3 = 1.548×10^{-5}\text{ x solar mass = time in seconds to singularity}[/itex]

For a 12,000-solar-mass black hole this corresponds to β‰ˆ0.1857 s of proper time from horizon crossing to singularity in the Schwarzschild idealization.

Hovering observers, orbits, and proper distance

Note: the mothership itself experiences mild gravitational time dilation. For example, hovering at r = 10^6 km, a 3-day interval at infinity corresponds to about 2 days, 22 hours, 45 minutes on the ship. If the ship is in a stable orbit at the same radius the dilation is slightly different (β‰ˆ2 days, 22 hours, 7 minutes) because orbital velocity contributes.

The combined time dilation for an object in stable orbit can be expressed as (original text):

[tex]\tau_o=t\sqrt{1-\frac{r_s}{r}}\cdot\sqrt{1-v_s^2}[/tex]

where [itex]\tau_o[/itex] is the proper time for an orbiting object and [itex]v_s[/itex] is the orbital velocity [itex]v_s=\sqrt(M/(r(1-r_s/r)))[/itex]. The expression above is equivalent to

[tex]\tau_o=t\sqrt{1-\frac{3}{2}\cdot\frac{r_s}{r}}[/tex]

where [itex]\tfrac{3}{2}r_s[/itex] marks the last stable circular orbit and also defines the photon sphere.

Another useful relation is the proper distance to the event horizon for a hovering observer:

[tex]\Delta r’=\frac{\Delta r}{\sqrt{1-\frac{r_s}{r_s+\Delta r}}}[/tex]

where [itex]\Delta r'[/itex] is the proper distance measured by the hovering observer and [itex]\Delta r[/itex] is the coordinate distance as observed from infinity. Numerically, at 1 km from the EH (coordinate distance as observed from infinity) the hovering observer measures β‰ˆ188 km to the EH; at 1 m they measure β‰ˆ5.954 km; at 5 mm they measure β‰ˆ421 m.

Falling from rest at infinity

For an object that falls from rest at infinity, the effective time dilation differs from the hovering case. The original text notes

[tex]\tau=t\left(1-\frac{r_s}{r}\right)[/tex]

which follows from [itex]\tau=t\sqrt(1-r_s/r)\cdot\sqrt(1-v^2)[/itex] with [itex]v=\sqrt(r_s/r)[/itex] for a free-fall from rest at infinity.

Click For Forum Comments

stevebd1

Early life spent working and studying in York UK, 3 year architecture degree at Oxford polytechnic, 2 year architecture diploma at Oxford polytechnic, part-time in US. Worked in both York and London within architectural profession.

More Related Articles

  • What is Mass Inflation? A 5 Minute Introduction
  • Dark Energy Part 1: Einstein-deSitter Cosmology
  • The Schwarzschild Geometry: Key Properties
  • The LCDM Cosmological Model in Simplified Math (Part 3)
  • Black Holes and the Properties of In-Falling Radial Plungers
  • Approximate LCDM Expansion in Simplified Math (Part 4)
Tags: black holes, redshift, time dilation
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/redshiftblackholes.png 135 240 stevebd1 https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Physics_Forums_Insights_logo.png stevebd12015-09-30 14:10:172026-01-22 09:28:24Time Dilation & Redshift of Schwarzschild Black Holes
You might also like
quasarredshift Evidence that Galaxy and Quasar Redshifts Are Cosmological
Kerr Spacetime Geodesic Congruences in FRW, Schwarzschild and Kerr Spacetimes
universeexpansion At What Velocity Does the Universe Expand and Can It Be Faster than Light?
SchwarzschildGeometry1 The Schwarzschild Geometry: Key Properties
killing Fields and Black Holes Killing Vector Field & Surface Gravity in Kerr BH Explained
neutrino Learn About Neutrino Masses and Speed
76 replies
« Older Comments
  1. PeterDonis says:
    May 19, 2016 at 4:06 pm

    Thread closed for moderation.

    Edit: Thread will remain closed.

    Log in to Reply
« Older Comments

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Trending Articles

  • What Planck Length Is and It’s Common Misconceptions
  • Animal Speed Scaling: Body-Lengths per Second Across Sizes
  • Unity Orbital Mechanics and AR Scaling: Implementation Guide
  • Exploring the Anatomy of Compton Scattering
  • Scientific Inference: Do We Really Need Induction?
  • The 7 Basic Rules of Quantum Mechanics
  • Mathematical Proofs: How to Understand and Write Them
  • David Hestenes on Geometric Algebra: Applications & Learning
  • How to Model a Magnet Falling Through a Conducting Pipe
  • Why You Can’t Quantum Tunnel Through a Wall

Physics Forums

  • Classical Physics
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
  • Quantum Physics
  • Special and General Relativity
  • Beyond the Standard Model
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Cosmology
  • Other Physics Topics

Receive Insights Articles to Your Inbox

Enter your email address:

Blog Information

  • Become a Member!
  • Write for Us!
  • Table of Contents
  • Blog Author List

Popular Topics

astronomy (17) black holes (17) classical physics (35) cosmology (16) education (23) electromagnetism (19) general relativity (19) gravity (24) interview (21) mathematics (39) mathematics self-study (21) Physicist (26) programming (18) Quantum Field Theory (31) quantum mechanics (36) quantum physics (24) relativity (40) Special Relativity (16) technology (19) universe (21)
2026 Β© Physics Forums, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - Contact Us - Privacy Policy - About PF Insights
  • Link to X
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Youtube
Link to: Higher Prequantum Geometry I: The Need for Prequantum Geometry Link to: Higher Prequantum Geometry I: The Need for Prequantum Geometry Higher Prequantum Geometry I: The Need for Prequantum GeometryprequantumgeometryLink to: Higher Prequantum Geometry II: The Principle of Extremal Action – Comonadically Link to: Higher Prequantum Geometry II: The Principle of Extremal Action – Comonadically prequantumgeometry2Higher Prequantum Geometry II: The Principle of Extremal Action – Com...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top