Physics Forums Insights
  • Physics
    • Physics Articles
    • Physics Tutorials
    • Physics Guides
    • Physics FAQs
  • Math
    • Math Articles
    • Math Tutorials
    • Math Guides
    • Math FAQs
  • Bio/Chem/Tech
    • Bio/Chem Articles
    • Computer Science Tutorials
    • Technology Guides
  • Education
    • Education Articles
    • Education Guides
  • Interviews
  • Quizzes
  • Forums
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
killing Fields and Black Holes

Killing Vector Field & Surface Gravity in Kerr BH Explained

September 6, 2018/0 Comments/in Physics Articles/by stevebd1
📖Read Time: 3 minutes
📊Readability: Moderate (Standard complexity)
🔖Core Topics: units, tex, killing, black, horizon

Table of Contents

  • Killing Vector Field
    • Kerr metric definitions
  • Killing Surface Gravity
    • Numerical example and unit clarification
  • Killing Horizon and Angular Velocity
    • Interpretation
  • Updates and notes
    • References
    • More Related Articles

Killing Vector Field

The Killing vector field is a vector field on a differentiable manifold that preserves the spacetime metric. In other words, it generates an isometry of the metric. Although the Killing vector that corresponds to time translation is timelike (c^2 dt^2 > dr^2) at spatial infinity, it need not be timelike everywhere outside a black hole (BH) horizon. For the Kerr metric (and in the non-rotating limit the Schwarzschild metric) the relevant metric component is

[tex]\tag{1} \kappa^2=g_{tt}=-\frac{\Delta-a^2\sin^2\theta}{\rho^2}[/tex]

Kerr metric definitions

Here

[tex]\Delta= r^{2}+a^{2}-2Mr[/tex]

[tex]\rho^2=r^2+a^2\cos^2\theta[/tex]

and

M = G m / c^2 (the gravitational radius, i.e. mass expressed as a length) and a = J / m c (the angular momentum per unit mass, with dimensions of length).

Equation (1) can be written as

[tex]\kappa^2=-\left(1-\frac{2Mr}{r^{2}+a^{2}\cos^{2}\theta}\right)[/tex]

From this expression, the Killing vector norm (g_tt) vanishes where coordinate time becomes null; for a static Schwarzschild black hole this occurs at the event horizon, while for a rotating Kerr black hole it vanishes at the ergosurface. Outside of that surface the coordinate time direction is spacelike (c^2 dt^2 < dr^2).

Killing Surface Gravity

Surface gravity (often denoted κ) has slightly different expressions in different contexts and unit conventions. In geometric units (G = c = 1) the common formulae are:

For a static Schwarzschild black hole:

[tex]\tag{2}\kappa=\frac{c^4}{4GM}[/tex]

For a rotating Kerr black hole (outer/inner horizons):

[tex]\tag{3}\kappa_{\pm}=\frac{r_{\pm}-r_{\mp}}{2\left(r_{\pm}^2+a^2\right)}[/tex]

where

[tex]\tag{4} r_+=M+\sqrt{M^2-a^2}[/tex]

[tex]\tag{5} r_-=M-\sqrt{M^2-a^2}[/tex]

Note: M here is the gravitational radius M = G m / c^2 (mass expressed in metres). The parameter a is the spin parameter (in metres) a = J / m c.

Numerical example and unit clarification

Using your example of a rotating 3-solar-mass black hole and spin parameter a = 0.95 (in geometrized units), you quoted:

κ_+ = 2.6855e-5

κ_- = -5.1241e-5

These numerical values are consistent with geometric units where κ has dimensions of inverse length (1/m). To convert to SI acceleration units (m/s^2) multiply κ by c^2. That is, κ_SI ≈ κ_geom × c^2. This matches the alternative source you found that multiplies by c^2.

Killing Horizon and Angular Velocity

The horizon angular velocity (the angular velocity of the Killing horizon) is

[tex]\tag{6}\Omega_H=\frac{a}{\left(r_{\pm}^2+a^2\right)}=\frac{1}{2} \frac{a}{M} \frac{1}{r_{\pm}}[/tex]

You reported the numeric results:

Ω_+ = 8.1699e-5

Ω_- = 1.5589e-4

In geometric units these Ω values have dimensions of inverse length. To obtain angular frequency in radians per second (as measured at infinity) multiply Ω by c. In other words, Ω_SI (rad/s) ≈ Ω_geom × c.

Interpretation

  • κ in geometric units is an inverse length; κ × c^2 gives a surface gravity in m/s^2 (acceleration).
  • Ω_H in geometric units is an inverse length; Ω_H × c gives an angular velocity in rad/s (frame-dragging rate as measured from infinity, typically evaluated in the equatorial plane).

Updates and notes

UPDATE — on the reduced circumference: if you compute the reduced circumference R at r_+ and r_- using the usual Kerr expressions, you may find results that coincide with the Schwarzschild radius in the special limits; this can occur depending on which coordinate slice (equatorial plane, Boyer–Lindquist coordinates, etc.) is used. Be explicit about the coordinate definitions when comparing radii.

UPDATE — regarding the inner horizon (r_-): equation (3) yields κ_- negative in geometric units. This sign difference is a well-known feature of the inner (Cauchy) horizon; converting to SI units with c^2 preserves the sign but changes the units to acceleration.


References

Steve

References cited in the original post:

  • Max Camenzind, “Compact Objects in Astrophysics” — pages referenced by the original author: (1) page 256, (3)(4)(5)(6) page 253.
  • Max Camenzind & A. Müller, “General Relativity, The Kerr Black Hole” — (7) page 211.
  • Wikipedia — Surface gravity
stevebd1

Early life spent working and studying in York UK, 3 year architecture degree at Oxford polytechnic, 2 year architecture diploma at Oxford polytechnic, part-time in US. Worked in both York and London within architectural profession.

More Related Articles

  • What is Mass Inflation? A 5 Minute Introduction
  • How to Solve Einstein’s Field Equations in Maxima
  • The Schwarzschild Geometry: Physically Reasonable?
  • Does Gravity Gravitate? Part 2
  • Exploring Fermi-Walker Transport in Kerr Spacetime
  • Learn Orbital Precession in the Schwarzschild and Kerr Metrics
Tags: black holes
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/killing_fields_black_holes.png 135 240 stevebd1 https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Physics_Forums_Insights_logo.png stevebd12018-09-06 11:45:312026-01-22 07:42:06Killing Vector Field & Surface Gravity in Kerr BH Explained
You might also like
SchwarzschildGeometry1 The Schwarzschild Geometry: Key Properties
gravity collapse The Oppenheimer-Snyder Model of Gravitational Collapse: An Overview
blackholeexists Do Black Holes Really Exist?
black holes are not empty VHE Gamma Rays from Sgr A*: Black Holes and CTA Observations
what are the black hole thermodynamics Black Hole Thermodynamics: Four Laws Explained — Guide
supernova Star Fate: From Nebulae to White Dwarfs and Black Holes
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Trending Articles

  • What Planck Length Is and It’s Common Misconceptions
  • Scientific Inference: Do We Really Need Induction?
  • Animal Speed Scaling: Body-Lengths per Second Across Sizes
  • Tensors Explained: Scalars, Vectors, Matrices & Math
  • Unity Orbital Mechanics and AR Scaling: Implementation Guide
  • The 7 Basic Rules of Quantum Mechanics
  • Math Self-Study Roadmap: Topics & Book Recommendations
  • How to Better Define Information in Physics
  • Android Rooting & Magisk Guide: Systemless Root Tips
  • Exploring the Anatomy of Compton Scattering

Physics Forums

  • Classical Physics
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
  • Quantum Physics
  • Special and General Relativity
  • Beyond the Standard Model
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Cosmology
  • Other Physics Topics

Receive Insights Articles to Your Inbox

Enter your email address:

Blog Information

  • Become a Member!
  • Write for Us!
  • Table of Contents
  • Blog Author List

Popular Topics

astronomy (17) black holes (17) classical physics (35) cosmology (16) education (23) electromagnetism (19) general relativity (19) gravity (24) interview (21) mathematics (39) mathematics self-study (21) Physicist (26) programming (18) Quantum Field Theory (31) quantum mechanics (36) quantum physics (24) relativity (40) Special Relativity (16) technology (19) universe (21)
2026 © Physics Forums, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - Contact Us - Privacy Policy - About PF Insights
  • Link to X
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Youtube
Link to: LHC Relativistic Energies and Time Dilation at 3.5–14 TeV Link to: LHC Relativistic Energies and Time Dilation at 3.5–14 TeV LHC Relativistic Energies and Time Dilation at 3.5–14 TeVLHC EnergiesLink to: Beginner Telescope Guide: Choose the Right First Scope Link to: Beginner Telescope Guide: Choose the Right First Scope Telescope Buying GuideBeginner Telescope Guide: Choose the Right First Scope
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top