Physics Forums Insights
  • Physics
    • Mechanics
    • Thermodynamics
    • Electromagnetism
    • Fluids
    • Optics
    • Particles
    • Quantum
    • Relativity
    • Biophysics
  • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Cosmology
    • Observing
  • Mathematics
    • Algebra
    • Analysis
    • Geometry
    • Number Theory
    • Probability
  • Computing
    • Programming
    • Electronics
    • Imaging
  • Science Culture
    • Education
    • Careers
    • Philosophy
    • Profiles
    • Trivia
  • Forums
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
killing Fields and Black Holes

Killing Vector Field & Surface Gravity in Kerr BH Explained

September 6, 2018/0 Comments/in Physics Articles, Relativity/by stevebd1
📖Read Time: 3 minutes
📊Readability: Moderate (Standard complexity)
🔖Core Topics: texunitsKillingblackhole

Table of Contents

  • Killing Vector Field
    • Kerr metric definitions
  • Killing Surface Gravity
    • Numerical example and unit clarification
  • Killing Horizon and Angular Velocity
    • Interpretation
  • Updates and notes
    • References
    • More Related Articles

Killing Vector Field

The Killing vector field is a vector field on a differentiable manifold that preserves the spacetime metric. In other words, it generates an isometry of the metric. Although the Killing vector that corresponds to time translation is timelike (c^2 dt^2 > dr^2) at spatial infinity, it need not be timelike everywhere outside a black hole (BH) horizon. For the Kerr metric (and in the non-rotating limit the Schwarzschild metric) the relevant metric component is

[tex]\tag{1} \kappa^2=g_{tt}=-\frac{\Delta-a^2\sin^2\theta}{\rho^2}[/tex]

Kerr metric definitions

Here

[tex]\Delta= r^{2}+a^{2}-2Mr[/tex]

[tex]\rho^2=r^2+a^2\cos^2\theta[/tex]

and

M = G m / c^2 (the gravitational radius, i.e. mass expressed as a length) and a = J / m c (the angular momentum per unit mass, with dimensions of length).

Equation (1) can be written as

[tex]\kappa^2=-\left(1-\frac{2Mr}{r^{2}+a^{2}\cos^{2}\theta}\right)[/tex]

From this expression, the Killing vector norm (g_tt) vanishes where coordinate time becomes null; for a static Schwarzschild black hole this occurs at the event horizon, while for a rotating Kerr black hole it vanishes at the ergosurface. Outside of that surface the coordinate time direction is spacelike (c^2 dt^2 < dr^2).

Killing Surface Gravity

Surface gravity (often denoted κ) has slightly different expressions in different contexts and unit conventions. In geometric units (G = c = 1) the common formulae are:

For a static Schwarzschild black hole:

[tex]\tag{2}\kappa=\frac{c^4}{4GM}[/tex]

For a rotating Kerr black hole (outer/inner horizons):

[tex]\tag{3}\kappa_{\pm}=\frac{r_{\pm}-r_{\mp}}{2\left(r_{\pm}^2+a^2\right)}[/tex]

where

[tex]\tag{4} r_+=M+\sqrt{M^2-a^2}[/tex]

[tex]\tag{5} r_-=M-\sqrt{M^2-a^2}[/tex]

Note: M here is the gravitational radius M = G m / c^2 (mass expressed in metres). The parameter a is the spin parameter (in metres) a = J / m c.

Numerical example and unit clarification

Using your example of a rotating 3-solar-mass black hole and spin parameter a = 0.95 (in geometrized units), you quoted:

κ_+ = 2.6855e-5

κ_- = -5.1241e-5

These numerical values are consistent with geometric units where κ has dimensions of inverse length (1/m). To convert to SI acceleration units (m/s^2) multiply κ by c^2. That is, κ_SI ≈ κ_geom × c^2. This matches the alternative source you found that multiplies by c^2.

Killing Horizon and Angular Velocity

The horizon angular velocity (the angular velocity of the Killing horizon) is

[tex]\tag{6}\Omega_H=\frac{a}{\left(r_{\pm}^2+a^2\right)}=\frac{1}{2} \frac{a}{M} \frac{1}{r_{\pm}}[/tex]

You reported the numeric results:

Ω_+ = 8.1699e-5

Ω_- = 1.5589e-4

In geometric units these Ω values have dimensions of inverse length. To obtain angular frequency in radians per second (as measured at infinity) multiply Ω by c. In other words, Ω_SI (rad/s) ≈ Ω_geom × c.

Interpretation

  • κ in geometric units is an inverse length; κ × c^2 gives a surface gravity in m/s^2 (acceleration).
  • Ω_H in geometric units is an inverse length; Ω_H × c gives an angular velocity in rad/s (frame-dragging rate as measured from infinity, typically evaluated in the equatorial plane).

Updates and notes

UPDATE — on the reduced circumference: if you compute the reduced circumference R at r_+ and r_- using the usual Kerr expressions, you may find results that coincide with the Schwarzschild radius in the special limits; this can occur depending on which coordinate slice (equatorial plane, Boyer–Lindquist coordinates, etc.) is used. Be explicit about the coordinate definitions when comparing radii.

UPDATE — regarding the inner horizon (r_-): equation (3) yields κ_- negative in geometric units. This sign difference is a well-known feature of the inner (Cauchy) horizon; converting to SI units with c^2 preserves the sign but changes the units to acceleration.


References

Steve

References cited in the original post:

  • Max Camenzind, “Compact Objects in Astrophysics” — pages referenced by the original author: (1) page 256, (3)(4)(5)(6) page 253.
  • Max Camenzind & A. Müller, “General Relativity, The Kerr Black Hole” — (7) page 211.
  • Wikipedia — Surface gravity
stevebd1
stevebd1

Early life spent working and studying in York UK, 3 year architecture degree at Oxford polytechnic, 2 year architecture diploma at Oxford polytechnic, part-time in US. Worked in both York and London within architectural profession.

More Related Articles

  • What is Mass Inflation? A 5 Minute Introduction
  • How to Solve Einstein’s Field Equations in Maxima
  • The Schwarzschild Geometry: Physically Reasonable?
  • Does Gravity Gravitate? Part 2
  • Exploring Fermi-Walker Transport in Kerr Spacetime
  • Learn Orbital Precession in the Schwarzschild and Kerr Metrics
Tags: black holes, Graduate, Kerr metric
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/killing_fields_black_holes.png 135 240 stevebd1 https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Physics_Forums_Insights_logo.png stevebd12018-09-06 11:45:312026-01-22 07:42:06Killing Vector Field & Surface Gravity in Kerr BH Explained
You might also like
inflation5 A Poor Man’s CMB Primer: Quantum Seeds
entanglement_entropy Learn Entanglement Entropy in Quantum Mechanics
renormalization2 Why Renormalisation in Quantum Theory Needs a Cutoff
Maupertuis Principle A Pure Hamiltonian Proof of the Maupertuis Principle
qtf_geometry Learn the Geometry of Mathematical Quantum Field Theory
gravity collapse Oppenheimer-Snyder Model of Gravitational Collapse: Mathematical Details
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Popular Articles

  • What Planck Length Is and It’s Common Misconceptions
  • Learn Interacting Quantum Fields in Mathematical Quantum Field Theory
  • Quantum Renormalisation Made Easy
  • How to Measure Internal Resistance of a Battery
  • Why You Can’t Quantum Tunnel Through a Wall
  • Can We See an Atom?
  • The Block Universe – Refuting a Common Argument
  • Knut Lundmark and the Forgotten Dark Matter Discovery
  • Learn the Physics of Virtual Particles in Quantum Mechanics
  • Light and Sound Interactions: Photoacoustic & Acousto-Optic

Physics Forums

  • Classical Physics
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
  • Quantum Physics
  • Special and General Relativity
  • Beyond the Standard Model
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Cosmology
  • Other Physics Topics

Receive Insights Articles to Your Inbox

Enter your email address:

Blog Information

  • Become a Member!
  • Write for Us!
  • Table of Contents
  • Blog Author List

Popular Topics

black holes (23) classical physics (35) education (23) FAQ (58) General (230) general relativity (23) Graduate (185) gravity (25) Guide (86) interview (49) mathematics (39) mathematics self-study (21) Physicist (26) Quantum Field Theory (34) quantum mechanics (36) quantum physics (24) relativity (40) Special Relativity (22) Tutorial (147) Undergraduate (287)
2026 © Physics Forums, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - Contact Us - Privacy Policy - About PF Insights
  • Link to X
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to LinkedIn
Link to: LHC Relativistic Energies and Time Dilation at 3.5–14 TeV Link to: LHC Relativistic Energies and Time Dilation at 3.5–14 TeV LHC Relativistic Energies and Time Dilation at 3.5–14 TeVLHC EnergiesLink to: Beginner Telescope Buying Guide: Dobsonians, Binoculars & More Link to: Beginner Telescope Buying Guide: Dobsonians, Binoculars & More Telescope Buying GuideBeginner Telescope Buying Guide: Dobsonians, Binoculars & More
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top