# LightCone7 Tutorial Part III – How Things are Computed

### 3.1 The Time-variable Hubble ‘constant’

LightCone 7 basically uses only the first Friedmann equation and the LCDM model, written with the observable redshift (z) as the independent variable. This equation essentially calculates the Hubble expansion rate over the whole redshift range that we can (in principle) observe. Since increased redshift means observations from earlier times, it can also be viewed as how the Hubble ‘constant’ changed over time.

##H = H_0 \left(\Omega_\Lambda + (1-\Omega) (z+1)^2 + \Omega_m (z+1)^3 + \Omega_r (z+1)^4\right)^{0.5}##

where ##H_0## is the present observed Hubble constant. Further, [itex]\Omega_\Lambda[/itex] is the equivalent energy density parameter of the cosmological constant [itex]\Lambda[/itex], a.k.a “dark energy”; [itex]\Omega_m[/itex] is the present matter density parameter (normal plus dark) and [itex]\Omega_r[/itex] is the present radiation energy density parameter. The ##\Omega## without subscript represents the present overall density parameter: ##\Omega=\Omega_\Lambda+\Omega_m+\Omega_r ##, which adds up to unity in the case of flat space.

### 3.2 The Inputs

In order to make the input parameters easier to explain in the tool-tips of the user interface, LightCone7 uses two Hubble times as inputs: (i) the present Hubble time (T_##\small H_0##), which is simply the inverse of the Hubble constant and: (ii) the long term Hubble time (T_##\small H_{\infty}##), which is the value the Hubble time will eventually reach and remain constant. It depends on the value of the cosmological constant (see ‘conversions’ below).

Since the factor [itex]z + 1[/itex] occurs so often, an extra parameter (the “stretch factor”) [itex]S = z + 1[/itex] is defined, making the equations neater. S can be thought of as the factor by which the wavelength of observed light has been ‘stretched’ since emission. The use of [itex]S = z + 1[/itex] also makes it possible to calculate into our future (with S < 1), without having special switches for z < 0.

[itex]S_{eq}=z_{eq}+1[/itex] is the stretch factor at matter-radiation density equality, i.e. where matter density started to dominate over radiation density. Derivation from CMB observations put it at around S=3400, which translates to about T = 50 thousand years.

Finally, to specify the range of the redshift to be tabulated, we LightCone7 uses upper and a lower S-values and the number of steps required between them. When a chart is requested, the number of steps are automatically set to the maximum (100).

### 3.3 Calculations

In all calculations, the convention ##c=1## is followed, which is natural if time is given in years and distances in light years.

The conversions of the two Hubble times to the three Omegas are:

[itex]\Omega_\Lambda = (T_{H_0}/T_{H_\infty})^2[/itex]

[itex]\Omega_m = (\Omega-\Omega_\Lambda)\, S_{eq}/(1+S_{eq})\approx \Omega-\Omega_\Lambda[/itex], since [itex]S_{eq} \gg 3000[/itex]

[itex]\Omega_r = \Omega_r/S_{eq} [/itex]

It is convenient for the integration process to write the expansion equation in terms of the variable Hubble time ##T_H## (where ##H## without subscript means the variable Hubble expansion rate and ##T## without subscript the variable cosmic time).

[tex]T_H = H^{-1} = T_{Ho} \left(\Omega_\Lambda + (1-\Omega) S^2 + \Omega_m S^3 + \Omega_r S^4 \right)^{-0.5}[/tex]

Since ##c=1##, this is numerically the same as the time-variable Hubble radius ##R_H##, which is referred to simply as ##R## in LightCone7.

Most of the output values calculated by LightCone7 are obtained by integrating the Hubble time (or radius) over a range of S values (i.e. a range of redshifts).

The cosmic time (at emission) for a galaxy now observed with stretch S:

[tex]T = \int_{s=S}^{s=\infty}{\frac{T_H }{s}}ds[/tex]

where ##s=\infty## implies cosmic time ##T=0##.

#### 3.3.1 Distances

The present proper distance to a galaxy now observed with stretch S:

[tex]D_{now} = \int_{s=1}^{s=S}{T_H ds}[/tex]

The proper distance (at emission) to a galaxy now observed with stretch S:

[tex]D_{then} = \frac{1}{S} \int_{s=1}^{s=S}{T_H ds}=\frac{D_{now}}{S}[/tex]

The particle horizon (at emission) for a galaxy now observed with stretch S:

[tex]D_{par} = \frac{1}{S}\int_{s=S}^{s=\infty}{T_H ds}[/tex]

which gives the radius of the observable universe at that the time of emission of the observed signal. It is essentially our past event horizon.

The cosmic horizon (at emission) for galaxy now observed with stretch S:

[tex] D_{hor} = \frac{1}{S} \int_{s=0}^{s=S}{T_H ds}[/tex]

where ##s=0## implies the infinite future. It is essentially our future event horizon.

To obtain all the values, it essentially means numerical integration for S from zero to infinity, but practically it has been limited to 10^{−7} < S < 10^{7} with quasi-logarithmic step sizes, e.g. a small % increase between integration steps.

#### 3.3.2 Recession Rates

The present recession rate of a galaxy now observed with stretch S:

##V_{now} = H_0 D_{now}##

The recession rate (at emission) of a galaxy now observed with stretch S:

##V_{then} = H D_{then}##

The recession rate history of a ‘generic’ galaxy that is presently receding at one light year per year, equivalent to ‘c’:

##V_{generic} = aH = H/S##

Such a galaxy is presently at a proper distance equal to the Hubble radius, but due to the accelerated expansion it is moving through the Hubble radius.

### 3.4 Conclusion

This then concludes the brief tutorial on the LightCone7 cosmological calculator, which was a collaborative effort from Physics Forums members. Any comments, suggestions, corrections and requests for additional data will be welcomed.

#### Bibliography

1. Brian Powell, “Inflationary Misconceptions and the Basics of Cosmological Horizons”, https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/inflationary-misconceptions-basics-cosmological-horizons/

2. Tamara M. Davis, “Fundamental Aspects of the Expansion of the

Universe and Cosmic Horizons”, http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0402278v1.pdf, Appendix A.

LightCone7 converts the equations to be in terms of stretch factor S (in place of t and a in Davis).

3. Burt Jordaan, “Approximate LCDM Expansion in Simplified Math”, https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/approximate-lcdm-expansion-simplified-math/

A very unique tool you've built! Brilliant!