Physics Forums Insights
  • Physics
    • Physics Articles
    • Physics Tutorials
    • Physics Guides
    • Physics FAQs
  • Math
    • Math Articles
    • Math Tutorials
    • Math Guides
    • Math FAQs
  • Bio/Chem/Tech
    • Bio/Chem Articles
    • Computer Science Tutorials
    • Technology Guides
  • Education
    • Education Articles
    • Education Guides
  • Interviews
  • Quizzes
  • Forums
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
prequantumgeometry5

Higher Prequantum Geometry V: The Local Observables – Lie Theoretically

October 14, 2015/1 Comment/in Physics Articles/by Urs Schreiber
📖Read Time: 8 minutes
📊Readability: Advanced 📐 (Technical knowledge needed)
🔖Core Topics: bracketspacehigherfieldform

Show Complete Series


Part  1: Higher Prequantum Geometry I: The Need for Prequantum Geometry
Part  2: Higher Prequantum Geometry II: The Principle of Extremal Action – Comonadically
Part  3: Higher Prequantum Geometry III: The Global Action Functional — Cohomologically
Part  4: Higher Prequantum Geometry IV: The Covariant Phase Space – Transgressively
Part  5: Higher Prequantum Geometry V: The Local Observables – Lie Theoretically
Part  6: Examples of Prequantum Field Theories I: Gauge Fields
Part 7: Examples of Prequantum Field Theories II: Higher Gauge Fields
Part 8: Examples of Prequantum Field Theories III: Chern-Simons-type Theories
Part 9: Examples of Prequantum Field Theories IV: Wess-Zumino-Witten-type Theories
Part 10: Introduction to Perturbative Quantum Field Theory

 

This article discusses how the previous considerations naturally follow the concepts of local observables of local field theories and of the Poisson bracket on them; as well as that of conserved currents and the variational Noether theorem relating them to symmetries. At the same time, all these concepts are promoted to prequantum local field theory.

As throughout, all this is indebted to discussion with Igor Khavkine.


 

In the last two articles (the ones on the global action functional and on the covariant phase space) we have arrived at a perspective of prequantum local field theory where the input datum is a partial differential equation of motion ##\mathcal{E}## on sections of a bundle ##E## over spacetime/worldvolume ##\Sigma## and equipped with a prequantization exhibited by a factorization of the Euler-Lagrange form ##E \stackrel{\mathrm{EL}}{\longrightarrow} \mathbf{\Omega}^{p+1,1}_{S}## and of the presymplectic current form ##\mathcal{E} \stackrel{\Omega}{\longrightarrow} \mathbf{\Omega}^{p,2}## through higher Cech-Deligne cocycles for an Euler-Lagrange ##p##-gerbe ##\mathbf{L}## and for a Lepage ##p##-gerbe ##\mathbf{\Theta}##:

local prequantization

This local data then transgresses to spaces of field configurations over codimension-k submanifolds of ##\Sigma##. Transgressing to codimension-0 yields the globally defined exponentiated action functional

globalaction functional

and transgressing to (the normal formal neighbourhood ##N^\infty_\Sigma \Sigma_p##of)  a codimension-1 (Cauchy-)surface ##\Sigma_p \longrightarrow \Sigma## yields the covariant phase space as a prequantized pre-symplectic manifold

covariant phase space

(Recall from the previous entry that throughout we are notationally abbreviating  the sections of the shell ##\mathcal{E}## over the formal normal neighbourhood ##N^\infty_\Sigma \Sigma_p## of ##\Sigma_p## by suppressing the symbol for formal normals and just writing   ##\Sigma## ##[\Sigma_p,\mathcal{E}]_\Sigma :=  [N^\infty_\Sigma \Sigma_p, \mathcal{E}]##.)

Given any space equipped with a map into some moduli space like this, an automorphism of this structure is a diffeomorphism of the space together with a homotopy which exhibits the preservation of the given map into the moduli space.

We consider now the automorphisms of the prequantized covariant phase space and of the Euler-Lagrange ##p##-gerbe that it arises from via transgression and find that these recover and make globally well-defined the traditional concepts of symmetries and conserved currents, related by the Noether theorem, and of observables equipped with their canonical Poisson bracket.


The correct automorphisms of presymplectic smooth spaces ##([\Sigma_p,\mathcal{E}]_\Sigma,\omega) \longrightarrow ([\Sigma_p,\mathcal{E}]_\Sigma,\omega)## are of course diffeomorphisms ##\phi : [\Sigma_p,\mathcal{E}]_\Sigma \longrightarrow [\Sigma_p,\mathcal{E}]_\Sigma## such that the presymplectic form is preserved, ##\phi^\ast \omega = \omega##. In the diagrammatics this means that ##\phi## fits into a triangle of the form

symplecto morphism

Viewed this way, there is an evident definition of an automorphism of a prequantization ##([\Sigma_p,\mathcal{E}]_\Sigma,\mathbf{\theta})## of ##([\Sigma_p,\mathcal{E}]_\Sigma,\omega)##. This must be a diagram of the following form

hamiltonian symplecto morphism

 

hence a diffeomorphism ##\phi## together with a homotopy ##\eta## that relates the modulating morphism of the translated prequantum bundle back to the original prequantum bundle. By the discussion in a previous article such homotopies are equivalently coboundaries between the Cech-Deligne cocycles that correspond to the maps that the homotopy goes between. Here this means that the homotopy in the above diagram is an isomorphism ##\eta : \phi^\ast \mathbf{\theta} \stackrel{\simeq}{\longrightarrow} \mathbf{\theta}## of circle bundles with connection. These pairs ##(\phi,\eta)## is what Souriau called the quantomorphisms. Via their canonical action on the space of sections of the prequantum bundle, these become the quantum operators.

To see what this is in local data, consider the special case that ##\theta## is a globally defined 1-form and suppose that ##\phi = \exp(t v)## is the flow of a vector field ##v##

hamiltonian flow

Then the homotopy filling the previous diagram is given by a smooth function ##\exp(i t \alpha )## such that
$$
\exp(t v)^\ast \theta – \theta = t d \alpha
\,.
$$
Infinitesimally, for ##t \to 0##, this becomes
$$
\mathcal{L}_v \theta = d \alpha
\,.
$$
Using Cartan’s formula for the Lie derivative on the left, and the fact that ##d \theta = \omega##, by prequantization, this is equivalent to
$$
d \underset{H}{\underbrace{( \alpha – \iota_v \theta )}} = \iota_v \omega
$$

This is the classical formula [Arnold 89] which says that
$$
H := \alpha – \iota_v \theta
$$
is a Hamiltonian for the vector field ##v##.

There is an evident smooth group structure on the homotopies as above, and one check that the induced Lie bracket on Hamiltonians ##H## with Hamiltonian vector fields ##v## is the following
$$
[(v_1,H_1), (v_2,H_2)] = ( [v_1,v_2], \iota_{v_2}\iota_{v_1}\omega )
\,.
$$
Traditionally this is considered only in the special case that ##\omega## is symplectic, hence equivalently, in the case that the above equation for ##d H## uniquely associates a Hamiltonian vector field ##v## with any Hamiltonian ##H##. In that case, we may identify a pair ##(v,H)## with just ##H## and then the above Lie bracket becomes the Poisson bracket on smooth functions induced by ##\omega##. Hence the Poisson bracket Lie algebra is secretly the infinitesimal symmetries of the prequantum line bundle ##\mathbf{\theta}##.
This is noteworthy. For instance in the example of the phase space ##(T^\ast \mathbb{R} = \mathbb{R}^2, \omega = d p \wedge dq)##
and writing ##q,p : \mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R}## for the two canonical coordinates (##p## is called the “canonical momentum”), then the Poisson bracket, as above, between these two is
$$[q,p] = i \hbar \;\;\; \in \;\; i \hbar \mathbb{R} \hookrightarrow \mathfrak{Pois}(\mathbb{R}^2,d p \wedge d q)\,.$$
This equation is often regarded as the hallmark of quantum theory. In fact, it is a prequantum phenomenon. Notice how the identification of the central term with ##i \hbar## follows here from the first prequantization step back in an earlier entry.


 

From the above equation for ##d H## it is clear that the Poisson bracket is a Lie extension of the Lie algebra of (Hamiltonian) vector fields by the locally constant Hamiltonians, hence by constant functions in the case that ##X## is connected. The non-trivial Lie integration of this statement is the Kostant-Souriau extension, which says that the quantomorphism group of connected phase space is a ##U(1)##-an extension of the diffeological group of Hamiltonian symplectomorphisms.

Hence in summary the situation for observables on the covariant phase space in codimension 1 is as follows:

kostant souriau extension


The above diagrammatic incarnation of the quantomorphism group and of the Poisson bracket has the advantage that it makes sense in more generality. The same kind of diagrams, but with the prequantum bundle ##\theta## replaced by the Lepage ##p##-gerbe that it arises from via transgression, gives a “de-transgression” of the Poisson bracket on observables to a higher bracket on “local observables”, namely on currents that give observables after integration over Cauchy surfaces, and more generally on higher currents that give observables after integration over higher codimension subspaces of spacetime/worldvolume.

Moreover, generally the symmetries of a ##p##-gerbe connection ##\nabla : X \to \mathbf{B}^{p+1} (\mathbb{R}/_{\!\hbar}\mathbb{Z})_{\mathrm{conn}}## form an extension of the symmetry group of the underlying space by the higher group of flat ##(p-1)##-gerbe connections [Fiorenza-Rogers-Schreiber 13a]:

symmetries of pgerbe


 

Specifying this general phenomenon to the Lepage ##p##-gerbes, it gives a Poisson bracket ##L_\infty##-algebra on higher currents (local observables) [Fiorenza-Rogers-Schreiber 13b] and its higher Lie integration to a higher quantomorphism group constituting a higher Kostant-Souriau extension of the differential automorphisms of the field bundle. This is determined by the (pre-)symplectic current ##p+2##-form ##\Omega## in analogy to how the ordinary Poisson bracket is determined by the (pre-)symplectic 2-form ##\omega##, hence this is a Poisson ##L_\infty##-bracket for what has been called “multisymplectic geometry” (see [Rogers 10]):

higher kostant souriau extension


 

So far this concerned the covariant phase space with its prequantization via the Lepage ##p##-gerbe. In the same way, there are the higher symmetries of the field space with its prequantization via the Euler-Lagrange ##p##-gerbes ##\mathbf{L}##:

symmetry of elgerbe

To see what these are in components, consider again the special case that ##\mathbf{L}## is given by a globally defined horizontal form, and consider a one-parameter flow of such symmetriesflow on elgerbeIn Cech-Deligne cochain components this diagram equivalently exhibits the equation
$$
\exp(t v)^\ast L – L = t \, d_H \Delta
$$
on differential forms on the jet bundle of ##E##, where ##v## is a vertical vector field. Infinitesimally for ##t\to 0## this becomes
$$
\mathcal{L}_v L = d_H \Delta
\,.
$$
Since ##L## is horizontal while ##v## is vertical, the left hand reduces, by the central equation of a previous article, to
$$
\iota_v d L = \iota_v( \mathrm{EL} – d_H\Theta )
\,,
$$
Therefore the infinitesimal symmetry of ##\mathbf{L}## is equivalent to
$$
d_H \underbrace{( \Delta – \iota_v \Theta )}_{J} = \iota_v \mathrm{EL}
\,.
$$
This says that associated to the symmetry ##v## is a current
$$
J := \Delta – \iota_v \Theta
$$
which is conserved (horizontally closed) on the shell (on the vanishing locus ##\mathcal{E}## of the Euler-Lagrange form ##\mathrm{EL}##).

This is precisely the statement of Noether’s theorem (the first variational theorem of Noether, to be precise).

Indeed, in its modern incarnation [Vinogradov 86, Khavkine 16], Noether’s theorem is understood as stating a Lie algebra extension of the Lie algebra of symmetries by topological currents to the Lie-Dickey bracket on equivalence classes of conserved currents (see [Barnich-Henneaux 96, section 3]).

Hence the ##\infty##-group extension of symmetries of the Euler-Lagrange ##p##-gerbe promotes Noether’s theorem to the statement that higher Noether currents form an ##L_\infty##-algebra extension of the infinitesimal symmetries by topological currents:

higher topological current extension


 

In summary, physical local observables arise from symmetries of higher prequantum geometry as follows:

local observables


 

That’s a fair bit of classical mechanics and of classical local field theory which we have now re-derived and pre-quantized. It’s time for some examples. The next two articles will be about applying all this to field theories of higher Wess-Zumino-Witten type and to field theories of higher Chern-Simons type.

Click For Forum Comments

Urs Schreiber

I am a researcher in the department Algebra, Geometry and Mathematical Physics of the Institute of Mathematics at the Czech Academy of the Sciences (CAS) in Prague.

Presently I am on leave at the Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in Bonn.

More Related Articles

  • A Pure Hamiltonian Proof of the Maupertuis Principle
  • PBS Video Comment: “What If Physics IS NOT Describing Reality”
  • A First Idea of Quantum Field Theory – 20 Part Series
  • Struggles With the Continuum: Is Spacetime Really a Continuum?
  • Struggles with the Continuum – Freeman Dyson and QED
  • Struggles With the Continuum: Point Particles and the Electromagnetic Field
Tags: axions, geometry, quantum geometry, quantum physics
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/prequantumgeometry5.png 135 240 Urs Schreiber https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Physics_Forums_Insights_logo.png Urs Schreiber2015-10-14 18:39:172024-12-06 21:31:23Higher Prequantum Geometry V: The Local Observables – Lie Theoretically
You might also like
quantum qubit A Classical View of the Qubit
prequantumgeometry2 Higher Prequantum Geometry II: The Principle of Extremal Action – Comonadically
tan rule Physical Applications of the “Tan Rule”
qtf_geometry Learn the Geometry of Mathematical Quantum Field Theory
quantum superposition Understanding Superposition Physically and Mathematically
prequantumgeometry4 Higher Prequantum Geometry IV: The Covariant Phase Space – Transgressively
1 reply
  1. ald1357 says:
    May 19, 2016 at 4:06 pm

    Speaking of geometric concept
    I add here a link Lighting engaged in
    ElectroGravity Via Geometric TimeField

    [MEDIA=youtube]coMaozR9vY8[/MEDIA]

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Trending Articles

  • Learn Why Ohm’s Law Is Not a Law
  • What Planck Length Is and It’s Common Misconceptions
  • A Guide to Going Back to School For Math or Science
  • Why the Need of Infinity in Physics
  • Frequently Made Errors in Mechanics: Kinematics
  • Time Dilation & Redshift of Schwarzschild Black Holes
  • Arnold Neumaier Interview: QFT Foundations & Thermal
  • How Does an Airplane Wing Work? A Primer on Lift
  • Garrett Lisi’s Superparticle Bet With Frank Wilczek
  • Why the Gauge (Henstock-Kurzweil) Integral Matters

Physics Forums

  • Classical Physics
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
  • Quantum Physics
  • Special and General Relativity
  • Beyond the Standard Model
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Cosmology
  • Other Physics Topics

Receive Insights Articles to Your Inbox

Enter your email address:

Blog Information

  • Become a Member!
  • Write for Us!
  • Table of Contents
  • Blog Author List

Popular Topics

astronomy (17) black holes (17) classical physics (35) cosmology (16) education (23) electromagnetism (19) general relativity (19) gravity (24) interview (21) mathematics (39) mathematics self-study (21) Physicist (26) programming (18) Quantum Field Theory (31) quantum mechanics (36) quantum physics (24) relativity (40) Special Relativity (16) technology (19) universe (21)
2026 © Physics Forums, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - Contact Us - Privacy Policy - About PF Insights
  • Link to X
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Youtube
Link to: Do Photons Move Slower in a Solid Medium? Link to: Do Photons Move Slower in a Solid Medium? Do Photons Move Slower in a Solid Medium?photonsmediumLink to: Why 1 Equals 0.999… — Explanations & Rigorous Proofs Link to: Why 1 Equals 0.999… — Explanations & Rigorous Proofs 999equals1Why 1 Equals 0.999… — Explanations & Rigorous Proofs
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top