Quantcast centrifugal force
image
Physics Forums Logo
image
image
* Register * Upgrade Blogs Library Staff Rules Mark Forums Read
image
image   image
image

Go Back   Physics Forums > PF Library > Physics > Classical Mechanics > Newtonian Dynamics


Menu
Home
Action
My entries
Subscribe to item
Defined browse
Select

Then Select

Then Select

Search

 
centrifugal force

Definition/Summary
On a body forced to move in a circle, there must be a centripetal force (a force directed toward the centre of the circle).

On a body forced to move in a circle, there is no centrifugal force, when viewed from an inertial frame.

An inertial observer, applying the inertial laws of motion, measures no centrifugal force on a body forced to move in a circle.

An observer forced to move in a circle (and therefore non-inertial) can apply the inertial laws of motion only by adding a "fictitious" centrifugal force to the physical forces.

Equations

Scientists
Sir Isaac Newton (1643-1727)
Jean le Rond d'Alembert (1717–1783)
Albert Einstein (1879-1955)

Recent forum threads on centrifugal force
 
Breakdown
Physics
> Classical Mechanics
>> Newtonian Dynamics

See Also
centripetal acceleratio
inertial observer
rotating frame

Images

Extended explanation
The Principle of Equivalence (the basis of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity) says that anyone can be a valid observer, but that the inertial equations of motion may have to be adjusted to introduce imaginary (non-physical) forces.

Centrifugal force on a body is such a non-physical force.

In particular, a rotating observer invents an imaginary (non-physical) centrifugal force to explain why objects appear to move round him.

"Centrifugal" means "away from the centre" … it comes from the Latin word fugo (I flee) … as does "refugee". It is the opposite of "centripetal", which means "toward the centre" (and comes from the Latin word peto, I seek … as does "petition").

On an object moving in a circular path, there is no centrifugal force as viewed by an inertial observer.

Centrifugal force on such an object only exists for non-inertial observers.

However, both inertial and non-inertial observers recognise a centrifugal force from such an object, on whatever is keeping it in the circle.

Two different meanings:

Most standard physics textbooks use the "modern" meaning of centrifugal force as a pseudoforce, existing only as an artefact of viewing things in a non-inertial frame.

It is not a "real" (physical) force, since it has no agent.

The "old-fashioned" meaning of centrifugal force as the Newton's-3rd-law pair ("reaction force") of the centripetal force is completely "real", in any frame.

These two different types of centrifugal force act on different bodies.

Whirling on a string:

An observer holding onto a string which is whirling him in a circle feels a force along his arm toward the centre of the circle.

However, he knows that he is not moving toward the centre.

So he also feels a force in the opposite direction, balancing the force along his arm.

In that sense, he genuinely feels a centrifugal force.

In a turning car:

The driver of a car turning sharply left notices that unsecured objects slide to the right … away from the centre of the turn.

In the driver's rotating (non-inertial) frame of reference, that can only be explained by a force to the right.

It is a centrifugal force, acting on everything in the car, but nothing physical is causing it.

If the driver regards that force as real, then he may apply the inertial laws of motion.

Commentary

Saw @ 03:21 AM Oct18-09
Very educative. Only one comment: I do not see how each of the two meanings (standard = fictitious versus old-fashioned = real = reactive) can be associated with a different physical situation (turning car versus whirling on a string, respectively):

In the "turning car" example, for the driver not to slide to the right as well, it is necessary that he himself is secured by a safety belt. So he feels an inward pressure on his chest (which plays the part of the pull of the string) and, with the same language used here, we could say that he genuinely feels himself pushing the belt in the opposite direction. In fact, his presence in the car means that more force has to be applied to obtain the desired effect (circular motion).
~EDIT(tiny-tim): Yes, the belt exerts a real force, pulling him in, and he chooses to use a frame in which there is a fictitious centrifugal force, pushing him out: in that frame, the forces balance, and he remains stationary.

tiny-tim @ 12:14 PM Jun28-08
"Two different meanings" section plagiarised from Doc Al


Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. © 2009 Physics Forums
Sciam | physorgPhysorg.com Science News Partner
image
image   image