Solution: epsilon proof: lim 0.9999...=1
In another form I presented a proof (post #145)that the lim of 0.9999....=1 using epsilon delta arguments. I was asked to explain each step so I am moving it here for the latex support.
I start with what DanLanglois presents presents in post #139
I do not prove this but it follow from basic arithmetic (by the way numbers carry in addition). One could prove this using mathematical induction.
For instance:
The next fact that we use is that for two series series {a_n} and {b_n}, if a_n=b_n it is true then:
[tex]\lim_{n\to\infty}\{b_n\}=\lim_{n\to\infty}\{b_n\}[/tex]
I claim that:
[tex]\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(0.999... + 10^{-n}\right) = lim_{n\to\infty}\left(0.999...\right)[/tex]
This is straight forward by showing the difference of these two series converges to zero. With this fact it is sufficient to show that:
(1) -- [tex]\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(1+\sum_{n}^{\infty}9*10^{-n} \right) = 1[/tex]
(note - we could have got to this point instead by using the geometric series as DanLanglois suggestes in post #146)
Now notice that 1>0.99, 1>0.999 etc, (which is provable by induction). Using this fact we get the inequality:
(2) -- [tex]\left(1+\sum_{n}^{\infty}9*10^{-n} \right) < \left(1+10^{-(n-1)} \right)[/tex]
subtracting 1 from each side:
(3) -- [tex]\left(\sum_{n}^{\infty}10^{-n} \right) < \left(10^{-(n-1)} \right)[/tex]
This fact will be used later.
Equation (1) is the limit we are trying to prove. We need to show that for any possible ε there exist an N so that for all n>N it is true that.
(4) -- [tex]\left|\left(1+\lim_{n\to\infty}\sum_{n}^{\infty}10^{-n} \right) - 1 \right| < \epsilon[/tex]
This equation can be simplified by bringing the 1 inside the limit. (again this follows from the linearity of the limit.)
(5) -- [tex]\left| \left(\lim_{n\to\infty}\sum_{n}^{\infty}10^{-n} \right) \right| < \epsilon[/tex]
To prove this we need to show that for any possible ε there exist an N so that for all n>N equation (5) is true.
We start with the left hand side of the inequality and apply inequality (3)
(6) -- [tex]\left| \left( \sum_{n}^{\infty}10^{-n} \right) \right| < \left| \left(10^{-(n-1)} \right) \right| [/tex]
now we want to make the thing on the left less then ε for any n>N. Well, what if the thing on the left was equal to epsilon for n=N
(7) -- [tex] \left( 10^{-(N-1)} \right)= \epsilon [/tex]
then because [tex]10^{-(n-1)}[/tex] is monotonically decreasing it follows for n>N that:
(8) -- [tex]\left(10^{-(n-1)} \right)<\left(10^{-(N-1)} \right)[/tex]
using this in (6) we get:
(9) -- [tex] \left| \left( \sum_{n}^{\infty}10^{-n} \right) \right| < \left| \left( 10^{-(N-1)} \right) \right|=\epsilon[/tex]
which is what we want. QED.
I start with what DanLanglois presents presents in post #139
Quote:
0.999... + 0.1 = 1 + 0.099...
0.999... + 0.01 = 1 + 0.0099...
0.999... + 0.001 = 1 + 0.00099..
0.999... + 0.01 = 1 + 0.0099...
0.999... + 0.001 = 1 + 0.00099..
For instance:
Code:
0.01 +0.99999... --------- =0.1 +0.00 +0.90999... ---------- =1 +0.0 +0.00999... ---------- 1.099999...
The next fact that we use is that for two series series {a_n} and {b_n}, if a_n=b_n it is true then:
[tex]\lim_{n\to\infty}\{b_n\}=\lim_{n\to\infty}\{b_n\}[/tex]
I claim that:
[tex]\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(0.999... + 10^{-n}\right) = lim_{n\to\infty}\left(0.999...\right)[/tex]
This is straight forward by showing the difference of these two series converges to zero. With this fact it is sufficient to show that:
(1) -- [tex]\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(1+\sum_{n}^{\infty}9*10^{-n} \right) = 1[/tex]
(note - we could have got to this point instead by using the geometric series as DanLanglois suggestes in post #146)
Now notice that 1>0.99, 1>0.999 etc, (which is provable by induction). Using this fact we get the inequality:
(2) -- [tex]\left(1+\sum_{n}^{\infty}9*10^{-n} \right) < \left(1+10^{-(n-1)} \right)[/tex]
subtracting 1 from each side:
(3) -- [tex]\left(\sum_{n}^{\infty}10^{-n} \right) < \left(10^{-(n-1)} \right)[/tex]
This fact will be used later.
Equation (1) is the limit we are trying to prove. We need to show that for any possible ε there exist an N so that for all n>N it is true that.
(4) -- [tex]\left|\left(1+\lim_{n\to\infty}\sum_{n}^{\infty}10^{-n} \right) - 1 \right| < \epsilon[/tex]
This equation can be simplified by bringing the 1 inside the limit. (again this follows from the linearity of the limit.)
(5) -- [tex]\left| \left(\lim_{n\to\infty}\sum_{n}^{\infty}10^{-n} \right) \right| < \epsilon[/tex]
To prove this we need to show that for any possible ε there exist an N so that for all n>N equation (5) is true.
We start with the left hand side of the inequality and apply inequality (3)
(6) -- [tex]\left| \left( \sum_{n}^{\infty}10^{-n} \right) \right| < \left| \left(10^{-(n-1)} \right) \right| [/tex]
now we want to make the thing on the left less then ε for any n>N. Well, what if the thing on the left was equal to epsilon for n=N
(7) -- [tex] \left( 10^{-(N-1)} \right)= \epsilon [/tex]
then because [tex]10^{-(n-1)}[/tex] is monotonically decreasing it follows for n>N that:
(8) -- [tex]\left(10^{-(n-1)} \right)<\left(10^{-(N-1)} \right)[/tex]
using this in (6) we get:
(9) -- [tex] \left| \left( \sum_{n}^{\infty}10^{-n} \right) \right| < \left| \left( 10^{-(N-1)} \right) \right|=\epsilon[/tex]
which is what we want. QED.
Total Comments 1
Comments
-
I see more in your proof that is wrong then is right. For example equation (1) is actually equal to 2. Equation (2) you are claiming that 2 < 1.something, so is also wrong. In equation 3 you lost a 9 somewhere.
Your proof is so riddled with notation and math errors that it is pretty much meaningless.Posted Jul25-12 at 01:36 PM by Integral


